呼吸对健康受试者腹痛阈值的影响-一项初步研究。

IF 1.9 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Scandinavian Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2025-08-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1515/sjpain-2025-0001
Jasmin Klick, Cui Yang, Armin Azimi, Christel Weiß, Christoph Reissfelder, Martin Schmelz, Erfan Ghanad
{"title":"呼吸对健康受试者腹痛阈值的影响-一项初步研究。","authors":"Jasmin Klick, Cui Yang, Armin Azimi, Christel Weiß, Christoph Reissfelder, Martin Schmelz, Erfan Ghanad","doi":"10.1515/sjpain-2025-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Pressure algometry is a validated method for objectively quantifying pain sensitivity in musculoskeletal disorders, particularly useful for diagnosis and monitoring of treatment responses. However, its application to abdominal pain sensitivity remains insufficiently standardized, especially regarding the influence of physiological factors such as respiration. This study investigated the impact of respiratory phase (inhalation vs exhalation) on abdominal pressure pain thresholds (PT) to support the development of standardized assessment protocols.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-one healthy medical students were recruited for the study. Each participant underwent three assessments of the abdominal PT with varying respiration phases. Furthermore, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were estimated to quantify the reliability of PT measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The respiration phase has a significant impact on the PT, which was found to be significantly lower during exhalation than during inhalation (431 ± 177 vs 492 ± 186 kPa, <i>p</i> = 0.0003). The pressure application rate (PAR) for the expiratory measurements was significantly lower compared to the inspiratory PAR (112 ± 56 vs 130 ± 63 kPa/s, <i>p</i> = 0.0007). Both ICCs had similar magnitudes (close to 0.9). No significant difference in PT was found between sexes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study underscores the impact of respiration on pain perception, revealing increased abdominal PT during inhalation. A standardized approach is needed for abdominal PT assessment to guarantee its success in diagnostic and therapeutic evaluations.</p>","PeriodicalId":47407,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of respiration on abdominal pain thresholds in healthy subjects - A pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"Jasmin Klick, Cui Yang, Armin Azimi, Christel Weiß, Christoph Reissfelder, Martin Schmelz, Erfan Ghanad\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/sjpain-2025-0001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Pressure algometry is a validated method for objectively quantifying pain sensitivity in musculoskeletal disorders, particularly useful for diagnosis and monitoring of treatment responses. However, its application to abdominal pain sensitivity remains insufficiently standardized, especially regarding the influence of physiological factors such as respiration. This study investigated the impact of respiratory phase (inhalation vs exhalation) on abdominal pressure pain thresholds (PT) to support the development of standardized assessment protocols.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-one healthy medical students were recruited for the study. Each participant underwent three assessments of the abdominal PT with varying respiration phases. Furthermore, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were estimated to quantify the reliability of PT measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The respiration phase has a significant impact on the PT, which was found to be significantly lower during exhalation than during inhalation (431 ± 177 vs 492 ± 186 kPa, <i>p</i> = 0.0003). The pressure application rate (PAR) for the expiratory measurements was significantly lower compared to the inspiratory PAR (112 ± 56 vs 130 ± 63 kPa/s, <i>p</i> = 0.0007). Both ICCs had similar magnitudes (close to 0.9). No significant difference in PT was found between sexes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study underscores the impact of respiration on pain perception, revealing increased abdominal PT during inhalation. A standardized approach is needed for abdominal PT assessment to guarantee its success in diagnostic and therapeutic evaluations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2025-0001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2025-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:压力测量法是一种有效的方法,用于客观量化肌肉骨骼疾病的疼痛敏感性,特别适用于诊断和监测治疗反应。然而,它在腹痛敏感性方面的应用仍然不够规范,特别是关于呼吸等生理因素的影响。本研究探讨了呼吸期(吸气与呼气)对腹压痛阈值(PT)的影响,以支持标准化评估方案的制定。方法:招募31名健康的医学生进行研究。每位参与者在不同的呼吸阶段进行了三次腹部PT评估。此外,估计类内相关系数(ICCs)来量化PT测量的可靠性。结果:呼吸相对PT有显著影响,呼气时PT明显低于吸气时(431±177 vs 492±186 kPa, p = 0.0003)。呼气测量的压力施加率(PAR)明显低于吸气PAR(112±56 vs 130±63 kPa/s, p = 0.0007)。两次icc的震级相似(接近0.9)。PT在性别间无显著差异。结论:我们的研究强调了呼吸对疼痛感知的影响,揭示了吸入过程中腹部PT的增加。需要一个标准化的方法来评估腹部PT,以保证其诊断和治疗评价的成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of respiration on abdominal pain thresholds in healthy subjects - A pilot study.

Objectives: Pressure algometry is a validated method for objectively quantifying pain sensitivity in musculoskeletal disorders, particularly useful for diagnosis and monitoring of treatment responses. However, its application to abdominal pain sensitivity remains insufficiently standardized, especially regarding the influence of physiological factors such as respiration. This study investigated the impact of respiratory phase (inhalation vs exhalation) on abdominal pressure pain thresholds (PT) to support the development of standardized assessment protocols.

Methods: Thirty-one healthy medical students were recruited for the study. Each participant underwent three assessments of the abdominal PT with varying respiration phases. Furthermore, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were estimated to quantify the reliability of PT measurements.

Results: The respiration phase has a significant impact on the PT, which was found to be significantly lower during exhalation than during inhalation (431 ± 177 vs 492 ± 186 kPa, p = 0.0003). The pressure application rate (PAR) for the expiratory measurements was significantly lower compared to the inspiratory PAR (112 ± 56 vs 130 ± 63 kPa/s, p = 0.0007). Both ICCs had similar magnitudes (close to 0.9). No significant difference in PT was found between sexes.

Conclusions: Our study underscores the impact of respiration on pain perception, revealing increased abdominal PT during inhalation. A standardized approach is needed for abdominal PT assessment to guarantee its success in diagnostic and therapeutic evaluations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Pain
Scandinavian Journal of Pain CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
73
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信