评估智障人士临终关怀计划工具包:智障社会关怀服务实施结果的探索。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Andrea Bruun, Amanda Cresswell, David Jeffrey, Leon Jordan, Richard Keagan-Bull, Jo Giles, Faye Gardiner, Meg Wilding, Nicola Payne, Sarah Swindells, Sarah L Gibson, Rebecca Anderson-Kittow, Irene Tuffrey-Wijne
{"title":"评估智障人士临终关怀计划工具包:智障社会关怀服务实施结果的探索。","authors":"Andrea Bruun, Amanda Cresswell, David Jeffrey, Leon Jordan, Richard Keagan-Bull, Jo Giles, Faye Gardiner, Meg Wilding, Nicola Payne, Sarah Swindells, Sarah L Gibson, Rebecca Anderson-Kittow, Irene Tuffrey-Wijne","doi":"10.1177/17446295251367687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study used qualitative surveys and focus groups to evaluate the implementation of an end-of-life care planning toolkit within intellectual disability social care services, by exploring whether it is beneficial and workable in this setting. Participants were staff trialling the toolkit and submitting feedback forms. Focus groups with support staff and service managers were also conducted. Feedback forms and focus group transcripts were coded using a modified framework approach. Data and analyses were discussed within the team (including researchers with intellectual disabilities). Thirty-four participants submitted 44 feedback forms. Two focus groups with seven participants were held. Participants found the toolkit approach and resources acceptable and appropriate, prompting positive eye-opening conversations. There were significant adoption and feasibility implementation challenges such as printing the resources, lack of time, and the sensitive end-of-life topic. Exploration of how to overcome these challenges is needed to successfully implement the toolkit in social care services.</p>","PeriodicalId":46904,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"17446295251367687"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating a toolkit for end-of-life care planning with people with intellectual disabilities: An exploration of implementation outcomes within intellectual disability social care services.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Bruun, Amanda Cresswell, David Jeffrey, Leon Jordan, Richard Keagan-Bull, Jo Giles, Faye Gardiner, Meg Wilding, Nicola Payne, Sarah Swindells, Sarah L Gibson, Rebecca Anderson-Kittow, Irene Tuffrey-Wijne\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17446295251367687\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study used qualitative surveys and focus groups to evaluate the implementation of an end-of-life care planning toolkit within intellectual disability social care services, by exploring whether it is beneficial and workable in this setting. Participants were staff trialling the toolkit and submitting feedback forms. Focus groups with support staff and service managers were also conducted. Feedback forms and focus group transcripts were coded using a modified framework approach. Data and analyses were discussed within the team (including researchers with intellectual disabilities). Thirty-four participants submitted 44 feedback forms. Two focus groups with seven participants were held. Participants found the toolkit approach and resources acceptable and appropriate, prompting positive eye-opening conversations. There were significant adoption and feasibility implementation challenges such as printing the resources, lack of time, and the sensitive end-of-life topic. Exploration of how to overcome these challenges is needed to successfully implement the toolkit in social care services.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46904,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17446295251367687\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17446295251367687\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17446295251367687","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究采用定性调查和焦点小组来评估智障社会护理服务中临终关怀计划工具包的实施情况,探讨它在这种情况下是否有益和可行。参与者是试用工具包并提交反馈表格的员工。与支援人员和服务经理进行焦点小组讨论。使用修改后的框架方法对反馈表格和焦点小组记录进行编码。数据和分析在团队内部进行讨论(包括智障研究人员)。34名参与者提交了44份反馈表格。举办了两个焦点小组,各有七名参加者。参与者发现工具包方法和资源是可以接受和适当的,促进了积极的大开眼界的对话。采用和可行性实施方面存在重大挑战,如打印资源、缺乏时间和敏感的生命周期结束主题。需要探索如何克服这些挑战,才能在社会护理服务中成功实施该工具包。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating a toolkit for end-of-life care planning with people with intellectual disabilities: An exploration of implementation outcomes within intellectual disability social care services.

This study used qualitative surveys and focus groups to evaluate the implementation of an end-of-life care planning toolkit within intellectual disability social care services, by exploring whether it is beneficial and workable in this setting. Participants were staff trialling the toolkit and submitting feedback forms. Focus groups with support staff and service managers were also conducted. Feedback forms and focus group transcripts were coded using a modified framework approach. Data and analyses were discussed within the team (including researchers with intellectual disabilities). Thirty-four participants submitted 44 feedback forms. Two focus groups with seven participants were held. Participants found the toolkit approach and resources acceptable and appropriate, prompting positive eye-opening conversations. There were significant adoption and feasibility implementation challenges such as printing the resources, lack of time, and the sensitive end-of-life topic. Exploration of how to overcome these challenges is needed to successfully implement the toolkit in social care services.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.30%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: The principal aim of the journal is to provide a medium for the exchange of best practice, knowledge and research between academic and professional disciplines from education, social and health settings to bring about advancement of services for people with intellectual disabilities. The idea of a practice-led journal is both exciting and timely. This journal serves as a medium for all those involved with people with intellectual disabilities to submit and publish papers on issues relevant to promoting services for people with intellectual disabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信