{"title":"新一代尿液分析仪FUS-3000 Plus的首次实验室评估。","authors":"Yasmine Nezzar, Elena Lazarova, Monia Chemais","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfaf111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Urine sediment analysis is a cornerstone of diagnostic testing. This study evaluates FUS-3000 Plus, an automated urine sediment analyzer using advanced imaging and artificial intelligence, to assess its technical performance and diagnostic accuracy for routine clinical use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study analyzed 98 urine samples for chemical parameters (pH, protein, blood, leukocyte esterase, and nitrite) and 76 samples for particle analysis (red blood cells [RBCs], white blood cells, epithelial cells, crystals, bacteria) by both FUS-3000 Plus and sediMAX™, the current laboratory analyzer in use. Additionally, 139 samples were tested for glucosuria and proteinuria, with results compared to the Cobas C702. Carry-over, precision, and linearity were assessed by internal quality controls in accordance with Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute protocols. Accuracy was further evaluated using external quality controls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FUS-3000 Plus demonstrated strong agreement with sediMAX for nitrites, protein, and leukocyte esterase (kappa values >0.5) and correlated well with the Cobas C702 for glucosuria and proteinuria. However, discrepancies were observed in glucosuria detection, with some samples yielding inaccurate results even during external quality control assessments. A carry-over effect for RBCs required a rinse step after highly concentrated samples.Precision was acceptable (CV: 3%-11%), and Bland-Altman plots showed strong agreement for formed elements (correlation >0.95). However, the analyzer had reduced accuracy in bacteriuria detection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FUS-3000 Plus is a reliable tool for routine urinalysis, excelling in particle classification. However, improvements are needed in bacteriuria detection and minimizing carry-over effects. Future research should explore its ability to identify additional cellular elements and its diagnostic utility in diverse clinical populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First Laboratory Evaluation of FUS-3000 Plus: A New-Generation Urine Analyzer.\",\"authors\":\"Yasmine Nezzar, Elena Lazarova, Monia Chemais\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jalm/jfaf111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Urine sediment analysis is a cornerstone of diagnostic testing. This study evaluates FUS-3000 Plus, an automated urine sediment analyzer using advanced imaging and artificial intelligence, to assess its technical performance and diagnostic accuracy for routine clinical use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study analyzed 98 urine samples for chemical parameters (pH, protein, blood, leukocyte esterase, and nitrite) and 76 samples for particle analysis (red blood cells [RBCs], white blood cells, epithelial cells, crystals, bacteria) by both FUS-3000 Plus and sediMAX™, the current laboratory analyzer in use. Additionally, 139 samples were tested for glucosuria and proteinuria, with results compared to the Cobas C702. Carry-over, precision, and linearity were assessed by internal quality controls in accordance with Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute protocols. Accuracy was further evaluated using external quality controls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FUS-3000 Plus demonstrated strong agreement with sediMAX for nitrites, protein, and leukocyte esterase (kappa values >0.5) and correlated well with the Cobas C702 for glucosuria and proteinuria. However, discrepancies were observed in glucosuria detection, with some samples yielding inaccurate results even during external quality control assessments. A carry-over effect for RBCs required a rinse step after highly concentrated samples.Precision was acceptable (CV: 3%-11%), and Bland-Altman plots showed strong agreement for formed elements (correlation >0.95). However, the analyzer had reduced accuracy in bacteriuria detection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FUS-3000 Plus is a reliable tool for routine urinalysis, excelling in particle classification. However, improvements are needed in bacteriuria detection and minimizing carry-over effects. Future research should explore its ability to identify additional cellular elements and its diagnostic utility in diverse clinical populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfaf111\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfaf111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
First Laboratory Evaluation of FUS-3000 Plus: A New-Generation Urine Analyzer.
Background: Urine sediment analysis is a cornerstone of diagnostic testing. This study evaluates FUS-3000 Plus, an automated urine sediment analyzer using advanced imaging and artificial intelligence, to assess its technical performance and diagnostic accuracy for routine clinical use.
Methods: The study analyzed 98 urine samples for chemical parameters (pH, protein, blood, leukocyte esterase, and nitrite) and 76 samples for particle analysis (red blood cells [RBCs], white blood cells, epithelial cells, crystals, bacteria) by both FUS-3000 Plus and sediMAX™, the current laboratory analyzer in use. Additionally, 139 samples were tested for glucosuria and proteinuria, with results compared to the Cobas C702. Carry-over, precision, and linearity were assessed by internal quality controls in accordance with Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute protocols. Accuracy was further evaluated using external quality controls.
Results: FUS-3000 Plus demonstrated strong agreement with sediMAX for nitrites, protein, and leukocyte esterase (kappa values >0.5) and correlated well with the Cobas C702 for glucosuria and proteinuria. However, discrepancies were observed in glucosuria detection, with some samples yielding inaccurate results even during external quality control assessments. A carry-over effect for RBCs required a rinse step after highly concentrated samples.Precision was acceptable (CV: 3%-11%), and Bland-Altman plots showed strong agreement for formed elements (correlation >0.95). However, the analyzer had reduced accuracy in bacteriuria detection.
Conclusion: FUS-3000 Plus is a reliable tool for routine urinalysis, excelling in particle classification. However, improvements are needed in bacteriuria detection and minimizing carry-over effects. Future research should explore its ability to identify additional cellular elements and its diagnostic utility in diverse clinical populations.