英国全科实习学员进行工作场所评估的经验,他们在能力进步的年度审查中获得了发展结果。

IF 1.1 Q3 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Julie Pattinson, Joseph Akanuwe, Sureyya Sonmez Efe, Kim Emerson, Bryony Sales, Shahid Merali, Andrew Wright, Attiya Khan, Aloysius Niroshan Siriwardena
{"title":"英国全科实习学员进行工作场所评估的经验,他们在能力进步的年度审查中获得了发展结果。","authors":"Julie Pattinson, Joseph Akanuwe, Sureyya Sonmez Efe, Kim Emerson, Bryony Sales, Shahid Merali, Andrew Wright, Attiya Khan, Aloysius Niroshan Siriwardena","doi":"10.1080/14739879.2025.2539735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Workplace-Based Assessment (WPBA) forms part of the integrated assessment system for UK General Practice (GP) licencing. An Annual Review of Competence Progression (ARCP) panel evaluates either satisfactory progress or requirement for development of specific capabilities. We aimed to explore GP trainees' experiences of undertaking WPBA when failing to progress by receiving a 'developmental' outcome 2 or 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a qualitative design employing Systematic Grounded Theory and semi-structured interviews. A purposive sample of GP trainees was recruited, at different stages of training and with varying demographic characteristics, who had a previous ARCP developmental outcome. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed, facilitated by NVivo 14.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We interviewed 20 GP trainees during 2024 who received a developmental outcome between 2020 and 2023. We identified five themes: 'potential for early intervention', included personalised support and better information provision; 'perceptions of how WPBA reflected trainee performance' including perceptions of the validity and reliability of WPBA and need for fair, trustworthy and transparent processes to reduce unfair discrimination; 'communication difficulties' arose in relation to culture, language and reflection for some study participants; 'relationships with peers and educational setting' were felt to affect performance; and some participants experienced negative 'effects on wellbeing'.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Suggestions aimed at supporting and overcoming potential challenges to undertaking WPBA during GP training, including personalised support, reviewing fairness of assessments, addressing communication and cultural barriers, enhancing training environments, fostering positive relationships, and mitigating negative wellbeing impacts, some of which were already in place, with others requiring development.</p>","PeriodicalId":46436,"journal":{"name":"Education for Primary Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experiences of UK general practice trainees undertaking workplace-based assessment who received a developmental outcome at their annual review of competency progression.\",\"authors\":\"Julie Pattinson, Joseph Akanuwe, Sureyya Sonmez Efe, Kim Emerson, Bryony Sales, Shahid Merali, Andrew Wright, Attiya Khan, Aloysius Niroshan Siriwardena\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14739879.2025.2539735\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Workplace-Based Assessment (WPBA) forms part of the integrated assessment system for UK General Practice (GP) licencing. An Annual Review of Competence Progression (ARCP) panel evaluates either satisfactory progress or requirement for development of specific capabilities. We aimed to explore GP trainees' experiences of undertaking WPBA when failing to progress by receiving a 'developmental' outcome 2 or 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a qualitative design employing Systematic Grounded Theory and semi-structured interviews. A purposive sample of GP trainees was recruited, at different stages of training and with varying demographic characteristics, who had a previous ARCP developmental outcome. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed, facilitated by NVivo 14.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We interviewed 20 GP trainees during 2024 who received a developmental outcome between 2020 and 2023. We identified five themes: 'potential for early intervention', included personalised support and better information provision; 'perceptions of how WPBA reflected trainee performance' including perceptions of the validity and reliability of WPBA and need for fair, trustworthy and transparent processes to reduce unfair discrimination; 'communication difficulties' arose in relation to culture, language and reflection for some study participants; 'relationships with peers and educational setting' were felt to affect performance; and some participants experienced negative 'effects on wellbeing'.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Suggestions aimed at supporting and overcoming potential challenges to undertaking WPBA during GP training, including personalised support, reviewing fairness of assessments, addressing communication and cultural barriers, enhancing training environments, fostering positive relationships, and mitigating negative wellbeing impacts, some of which were already in place, with others requiring development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46436,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education for Primary Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education for Primary Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2025.2539735\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education for Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2025.2539735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:基于工作场所的评估(WPBA)是英国全科医生(GP)执照综合评估系统的一部分。能力发展的年度评审(ARCP)小组评估令人满意的进展或发展特定能力的要求。我们的目的是探索全科医生学员在接受“发展”结果2或3而未能取得进展时进行WPBA的经验。方法:采用定性设计,采用系统扎根理论和半结构化访谈。有目的的全科医生培训生样本被招募,在不同的培训阶段和不同的人口统计学特征,谁有以前的ARCP发展结果。在NVivo 14的协助下,对访谈进行了记录、逐字转录和分析。结果:我们在2024年采访了20名全科医生实习生,他们在2020年至2023年期间接受了发展结果。我们确定了五个主题:“早期干预的潜力”,包括个性化支持和更好的信息提供;“对WPBA如何反映受训人员绩效的看法”,包括对WPBA有效性和可靠性的看法,以及对公平、值得信赖和透明的过程以减少不公平歧视的需求;一些研究参与者在文化、语言和反思方面出现了“沟通困难”;“与同伴的关系和教育环境”被认为会影响表现;一些参与者经历了负面的“幸福感影响”。结论:建议旨在支持和克服在全科医生培训期间开展WPBA的潜在挑战,包括个性化支持,审查评估的公平性,解决沟通和文化障碍,改善培训环境,培养积极的关系,减轻负面的健康影响,其中一些已经到位,其他一些需要发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experiences of UK general practice trainees undertaking workplace-based assessment who received a developmental outcome at their annual review of competency progression.

Background: Workplace-Based Assessment (WPBA) forms part of the integrated assessment system for UK General Practice (GP) licencing. An Annual Review of Competence Progression (ARCP) panel evaluates either satisfactory progress or requirement for development of specific capabilities. We aimed to explore GP trainees' experiences of undertaking WPBA when failing to progress by receiving a 'developmental' outcome 2 or 3.

Methods: We used a qualitative design employing Systematic Grounded Theory and semi-structured interviews. A purposive sample of GP trainees was recruited, at different stages of training and with varying demographic characteristics, who had a previous ARCP developmental outcome. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed, facilitated by NVivo 14.

Results: We interviewed 20 GP trainees during 2024 who received a developmental outcome between 2020 and 2023. We identified five themes: 'potential for early intervention', included personalised support and better information provision; 'perceptions of how WPBA reflected trainee performance' including perceptions of the validity and reliability of WPBA and need for fair, trustworthy and transparent processes to reduce unfair discrimination; 'communication difficulties' arose in relation to culture, language and reflection for some study participants; 'relationships with peers and educational setting' were felt to affect performance; and some participants experienced negative 'effects on wellbeing'.

Conclusion: Suggestions aimed at supporting and overcoming potential challenges to undertaking WPBA during GP training, including personalised support, reviewing fairness of assessments, addressing communication and cultural barriers, enhancing training environments, fostering positive relationships, and mitigating negative wellbeing impacts, some of which were already in place, with others requiring development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Education for Primary Care
Education for Primary Care PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Education for Primary Care aims to reflect the best experience, expertise and innovative ideas in the development of undergraduate, postgraduate and continuing primary care education. The journal is UK based but welcomes contributions from all over the world. Readers will benefit from the broader perspectives on educational activities provided through the contributions of all health professionals, including general practitioners, nurses, midwives, health visitors, community nurses and managers. This sharing of experiences has the potential for enhancing healthcare delivery and for promoting interprofessional working.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信