导航过程中视觉和自我运动线索组合的测试-重测可靠性:准确性、可变性和线索权重。

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Corey S Shayman, Phoenix D Hines, Maggie K McCracken, Jensen Koff, Hunter C Finney, Jeanine K Stefanucci, Sarah H Creem-Regehr
{"title":"导航过程中视觉和自我运动线索组合的测试-重测可靠性:准确性、可变性和线索权重。","authors":"Corey S Shayman, Phoenix D Hines, Maggie K McCracken, Jensen Koff, Hunter C Finney, Jeanine K Stefanucci, Sarah H Creem-Regehr","doi":"10.1080/13875868.2025.2492553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multisensory cue combination during navigation is examined for the relative use and integration of different sensory spatial cues, but the reliability of cue combination metrics has not yet been characterized. We quantify the test-retest reliability of three metrics (accuracy, variability, predicted cue-weighting) used in studies of sensory cue combination for spatial updating. Participants completed a triangular homing task in immersive virtual reality comprising three cue conditions - visual cues-only, self-motion cues-only, and visual + self-motion cues - in two sessions separated by an average 11-day interval. We found strong test-retest reliability of homing accuracy with two sensory cues but poor reliability of accuracy when only one sensory cue was available. Homing variability and predicted cue-weighting showed poor test-retest reliability across all conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":46199,"journal":{"name":"Spatial Cognition and Computation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12338307/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Test-retest reliability of visual and self-motion cue combination during navigation: Accuracy, variability, and cue weighting.\",\"authors\":\"Corey S Shayman, Phoenix D Hines, Maggie K McCracken, Jensen Koff, Hunter C Finney, Jeanine K Stefanucci, Sarah H Creem-Regehr\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13875868.2025.2492553\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Multisensory cue combination during navigation is examined for the relative use and integration of different sensory spatial cues, but the reliability of cue combination metrics has not yet been characterized. We quantify the test-retest reliability of three metrics (accuracy, variability, predicted cue-weighting) used in studies of sensory cue combination for spatial updating. Participants completed a triangular homing task in immersive virtual reality comprising three cue conditions - visual cues-only, self-motion cues-only, and visual + self-motion cues - in two sessions separated by an average 11-day interval. We found strong test-retest reliability of homing accuracy with two sensory cues but poor reliability of accuracy when only one sensory cue was available. Homing variability and predicted cue-weighting showed poor test-retest reliability across all conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46199,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spatial Cognition and Computation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12338307/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spatial Cognition and Computation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13875868.2025.2492553\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spatial Cognition and Computation","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13875868.2025.2492553","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在导航过程中,多感官线索组合检测了不同感官空间线索的相对使用和整合,但线索组合度量的可靠性尚未表征。我们量化了空间更新感官线索组合研究中使用的三个指标(准确性、可变性、预测线索权重)的重测信度。参与者在沉浸式虚拟现实中完成了一个三角形的归家任务,该任务包括三种线索条件——只有视觉线索、只有自我运动线索和视觉+自我运动线索——在平均间隔11天的两个阶段中完成。我们发现两个感官线索导引精度的重测信度较强,而只有一个感官线索导引精度的重测信度较差。归巢变异性和预测的线索权重在所有条件下都显示出较差的重测信度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Test-retest reliability of visual and self-motion cue combination during navigation: Accuracy, variability, and cue weighting.

Multisensory cue combination during navigation is examined for the relative use and integration of different sensory spatial cues, but the reliability of cue combination metrics has not yet been characterized. We quantify the test-retest reliability of three metrics (accuracy, variability, predicted cue-weighting) used in studies of sensory cue combination for spatial updating. Participants completed a triangular homing task in immersive virtual reality comprising three cue conditions - visual cues-only, self-motion cues-only, and visual + self-motion cues - in two sessions separated by an average 11-day interval. We found strong test-retest reliability of homing accuracy with two sensory cues but poor reliability of accuracy when only one sensory cue was available. Homing variability and predicted cue-weighting showed poor test-retest reliability across all conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spatial Cognition and Computation
Spatial Cognition and Computation PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信