基于mooc的混合学习模式对中国医学生组织学课程表现、满意度和认知的影响。

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Advances in Medical Education and Practice Pub Date : 2025-08-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/AMEP.S534676
Yanmin Zhang, Shangming Liu, Chunyang Li, Aijun Hao
{"title":"基于mooc的混合学习模式对中国医学生组织学课程表现、满意度和认知的影响。","authors":"Yanmin Zhang, Shangming Liu, Chunyang Li, Aijun Hao","doi":"10.2147/AMEP.S534676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While massive open online course (MOOC)-based blended learning has gained popularity across disciplines, its adoption in medical histology education is underexplored, and its educational benefits for undergraduate medical students have yet to be clearly established.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined the relative effectiveness of traditional and blended learning methods in terms of academic performance, student perceptions, and learning satisfaction among first-year medical students in China enrolled in a histology course.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, two groups with similar age, gender, and academic background were analyzed. The control group (n = 44) received traditional lecture-based teaching (LBT group), while the blended learning group (n = 45) received hybrid teaching, which combined traditional lecture-based teaching and MOOC (LBTM group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final examination score of the blended learning participants was significantly higher than that of the control participants (LBTM 81.00 ± 10.84 vs LBT 75.34 ± 12.50, <i>P</i> < 0.05). The LBTM group demonstrated higher mean scores among the middle 30% (Mann-Whitney <i>U</i>-test, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and the lower 50% (Mann-Whitney <i>U</i>-test, <i>P</i> < 0.01) of students. Additionally, the final examination score was significantly correlated with the in-class quiz score (R = 0.420, <i>P</i> < 0.01). The implementation of blended learning was well-received by students in the LBTM group, who preferred the blended learning model (64.44%). Moreover, higher satisfaction was observed with blended learning (LBTM 21.87 ± 4.36 vs LBT 15.20 ± 4.15, <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Blended learning led to significant improvements in students' performance, satisfaction, and perception compared with traditional learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":47404,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","volume":"16 ","pages":"1501-1510"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12379999/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of a MOOC-Based Blended Learning Model on Performance, Satisfaction, and Perceptions in a Histology Course for Chinese Medical Students.\",\"authors\":\"Yanmin Zhang, Shangming Liu, Chunyang Li, Aijun Hao\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/AMEP.S534676\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While massive open online course (MOOC)-based blended learning has gained popularity across disciplines, its adoption in medical histology education is underexplored, and its educational benefits for undergraduate medical students have yet to be clearly established.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined the relative effectiveness of traditional and blended learning methods in terms of academic performance, student perceptions, and learning satisfaction among first-year medical students in China enrolled in a histology course.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, two groups with similar age, gender, and academic background were analyzed. The control group (n = 44) received traditional lecture-based teaching (LBT group), while the blended learning group (n = 45) received hybrid teaching, which combined traditional lecture-based teaching and MOOC (LBTM group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final examination score of the blended learning participants was significantly higher than that of the control participants (LBTM 81.00 ± 10.84 vs LBT 75.34 ± 12.50, <i>P</i> < 0.05). The LBTM group demonstrated higher mean scores among the middle 30% (Mann-Whitney <i>U</i>-test, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and the lower 50% (Mann-Whitney <i>U</i>-test, <i>P</i> < 0.01) of students. Additionally, the final examination score was significantly correlated with the in-class quiz score (R = 0.420, <i>P</i> < 0.01). The implementation of blended learning was well-received by students in the LBTM group, who preferred the blended learning model (64.44%). Moreover, higher satisfaction was observed with blended learning (LBTM 21.87 ± 4.36 vs LBT 15.20 ± 4.15, <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Blended learning led to significant improvements in students' performance, satisfaction, and perception compared with traditional learning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Medical Education and Practice\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1501-1510\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12379999/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Medical Education and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S534676\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S534676","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然基于大规模在线开放课程(MOOC)的混合学习已经在各个学科中流行起来,但它在医学组织学教育中的应用还没有得到充分的探索,而且它对医科本科生的教育效益还没有得到明确的确立。目的:本研究考察了传统学习方法和混合学习方法在学习成绩、学生认知和学习满意度方面的相对有效性。方法:本研究采用年龄、性别、学历相近的两组进行分析。对照组(n = 44)采用传统授课式教学(LBT组),混合学习组(n = 45)采用传统授课式教学与MOOC (LBTM组)相结合的混合式教学。结果:混合学习组期末考试成绩显著高于对照组(LBTM为81.00±10.84,LBT为75.34±12.50,P < 0.05)。LBTM组在中游30%学生(Mann-Whitney u检验,P < 0.001)和中游50%学生(Mann-Whitney u检验,P < 0.01)的平均得分较高。期末考试成绩与课堂测验成绩显著相关(R = 0.420, P < 0.01)。LBTM组学生对混合式学习的实施表示欢迎,64.44%的学生更喜欢混合式学习模式。此外,混合式学习的满意度更高(LBTM为21.87±4.36,LBT为15.20±4.15,P < 0.001)。结论:与传统学习相比,混合式学习对学生的学习成绩、满意度和认知有显著提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Impact of a MOOC-Based Blended Learning Model on Performance, Satisfaction, and Perceptions in a Histology Course for Chinese Medical Students.

Impact of a MOOC-Based Blended Learning Model on Performance, Satisfaction, and Perceptions in a Histology Course for Chinese Medical Students.

Impact of a MOOC-Based Blended Learning Model on Performance, Satisfaction, and Perceptions in a Histology Course for Chinese Medical Students.

Background: While massive open online course (MOOC)-based blended learning has gained popularity across disciplines, its adoption in medical histology education is underexplored, and its educational benefits for undergraduate medical students have yet to be clearly established.

Objective: This study examined the relative effectiveness of traditional and blended learning methods in terms of academic performance, student perceptions, and learning satisfaction among first-year medical students in China enrolled in a histology course.

Methods: In this study, two groups with similar age, gender, and academic background were analyzed. The control group (n = 44) received traditional lecture-based teaching (LBT group), while the blended learning group (n = 45) received hybrid teaching, which combined traditional lecture-based teaching and MOOC (LBTM group).

Results: The final examination score of the blended learning participants was significantly higher than that of the control participants (LBTM 81.00 ± 10.84 vs LBT 75.34 ± 12.50, P < 0.05). The LBTM group demonstrated higher mean scores among the middle 30% (Mann-Whitney U-test, P < 0.001) and the lower 50% (Mann-Whitney U-test, P < 0.01) of students. Additionally, the final examination score was significantly correlated with the in-class quiz score (R = 0.420, P < 0.01). The implementation of blended learning was well-received by students in the LBTM group, who preferred the blended learning model (64.44%). Moreover, higher satisfaction was observed with blended learning (LBTM 21.87 ± 4.36 vs LBT 15.20 ± 4.15, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Blended learning led to significant improvements in students' performance, satisfaction, and perception compared with traditional learning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Medical Education and Practice
Advances in Medical Education and Practice EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
189
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信