医疗保健专业人员参与CME和信用合规分析:来自中国广东一家医院的五年研究(2019-2023)

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Advances in Medical Education and Practice Pub Date : 2025-08-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/AMEP.S535544
Dongxue Yang, Jiansong Chen, Jiaying Li, Xicheng Pu, Siyu Wu, Zeyu Jiang, Zhuoli Li, Yinglian Cai, Biyu Ye, Chanjuan Yang
{"title":"医疗保健专业人员参与CME和信用合规分析:来自中国广东一家医院的五年研究(2019-2023)","authors":"Dongxue Yang, Jiansong Chen, Jiaying Li, Xicheng Pu, Siyu Wu, Zeyu Jiang, Zhuoli Li, Yinglian Cai, Biyu Ye, Chanjuan Yang","doi":"10.2147/AMEP.S535544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Continuing Medical Education (CME) is vital for maintaining and improving the competencies of healthcare professionals. Despite the recognized importance of CME, disparities in CME engagement across professional roles remain underexplored in China. This study aims to addresses this gap by analyzing the participation and credit compliance of healthcare professionals in CME programs at a hospital in Guangdong Province over a five-year period (2019-2023) and to explore the differences across different professional titles and specializations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of 5,156 records from the hospital's proprietary electronic CME management system. All full-time clinical staff were included. Descriptive statistics quantified annual average participation and credit compliance rates. Chi-square tests (χ²) assessed differences by title and specialty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results indicate that over the past five years, both CME participation and credit compliance steadily increased. Significant differences were observed in participation among healthcare professionals with different professional titles (<i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup>=38.02, <i>p</i><0.001), with intermediate-title staff exhibiting the highest participation (98.8%) and junior-title staff the lowest (95.4%). Credit compliance rates also differed significantly among professional titles (<i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup>=43.88, <i>p</i><0.001), with intermediate-title group reaching the highest credit compliance rate (97.1%) and senior consultant-title group the lowest (89.1%). Additionally, there were significant variations in credit compliance rates across different specialties (<i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup>=233.10, <i>p</i><0.001), with nursing professionals at the top (99.3%) and technicians at the bottom (90.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant disparities in CME participation and credit compliance were observed across professional titles and clinical specialties. The findings suggest that CME programs should be tailored to the specific needs of different professional groups. These insights provide valuable recommendations for policymakers and hospital administrators seeking to optimizing CME program design, enhancing participation, and improving healthcare quality through continued professional development.</p>","PeriodicalId":47404,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","volume":"16 ","pages":"1547-1558"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12398291/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of CME Participation and Credit Compliance Among Healthcare Professionals: A Five-Year Study (2019-2023) From a Hospital in Guangdong, China.\",\"authors\":\"Dongxue Yang, Jiansong Chen, Jiaying Li, Xicheng Pu, Siyu Wu, Zeyu Jiang, Zhuoli Li, Yinglian Cai, Biyu Ye, Chanjuan Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/AMEP.S535544\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Continuing Medical Education (CME) is vital for maintaining and improving the competencies of healthcare professionals. Despite the recognized importance of CME, disparities in CME engagement across professional roles remain underexplored in China. This study aims to addresses this gap by analyzing the participation and credit compliance of healthcare professionals in CME programs at a hospital in Guangdong Province over a five-year period (2019-2023) and to explore the differences across different professional titles and specializations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of 5,156 records from the hospital's proprietary electronic CME management system. All full-time clinical staff were included. Descriptive statistics quantified annual average participation and credit compliance rates. Chi-square tests (χ²) assessed differences by title and specialty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results indicate that over the past five years, both CME participation and credit compliance steadily increased. Significant differences were observed in participation among healthcare professionals with different professional titles (<i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup>=38.02, <i>p</i><0.001), with intermediate-title staff exhibiting the highest participation (98.8%) and junior-title staff the lowest (95.4%). Credit compliance rates also differed significantly among professional titles (<i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup>=43.88, <i>p</i><0.001), with intermediate-title group reaching the highest credit compliance rate (97.1%) and senior consultant-title group the lowest (89.1%). Additionally, there were significant variations in credit compliance rates across different specialties (<i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup>=233.10, <i>p</i><0.001), with nursing professionals at the top (99.3%) and technicians at the bottom (90.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant disparities in CME participation and credit compliance were observed across professional titles and clinical specialties. The findings suggest that CME programs should be tailored to the specific needs of different professional groups. These insights provide valuable recommendations for policymakers and hospital administrators seeking to optimizing CME program design, enhancing participation, and improving healthcare quality through continued professional development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Medical Education and Practice\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1547-1558\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12398291/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Medical Education and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S535544\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S535544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:继续医学教育(CME)对维持和提高医疗保健专业人员的能力至关重要。尽管认识到CME的重要性,但在中国,不同专业角色的CME参与差异仍未得到充分探讨。本研究旨在通过分析广东省某医院五年间(2019-2023年)医疗保健专业人员在CME项目中的参与情况和信用合规情况,并探讨不同职称和专业之间的差异,来解决这一差距。方法:对该医院专有电子CME管理系统中的5156份记录进行回顾性分析。包括所有全职临床工作人员。描述性统计量化了年平均参与率和信用合规率。卡方检验(χ²)评估职称和专业的差异。结果:结果表明,在过去的五年中,CME的参与和信用合规都在稳步增长。不同职称的医护人员参与CME的情况差异有统计学意义(χ 2=38.02, pχ 2=43.88, pχ 2=233.10, p)。结论:不同职称和临床专科的医护人员参与CME的情况和信用遵守情况差异有统计学意义。研究结果表明,CME项目应该根据不同专业群体的具体需求进行调整。这些见解为决策者和医院管理者提供了有价值的建议,他们希望通过持续的专业发展来优化CME项目设计、提高参与度和提高医疗质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Analysis of CME Participation and Credit Compliance Among Healthcare Professionals: A Five-Year Study (2019-2023) From a Hospital in Guangdong, China.

Analysis of CME Participation and Credit Compliance Among Healthcare Professionals: A Five-Year Study (2019-2023) From a Hospital in Guangdong, China.

Analysis of CME Participation and Credit Compliance Among Healthcare Professionals: A Five-Year Study (2019-2023) From a Hospital in Guangdong, China.

Analysis of CME Participation and Credit Compliance Among Healthcare Professionals: A Five-Year Study (2019-2023) From a Hospital in Guangdong, China.

Objective: Continuing Medical Education (CME) is vital for maintaining and improving the competencies of healthcare professionals. Despite the recognized importance of CME, disparities in CME engagement across professional roles remain underexplored in China. This study aims to addresses this gap by analyzing the participation and credit compliance of healthcare professionals in CME programs at a hospital in Guangdong Province over a five-year period (2019-2023) and to explore the differences across different professional titles and specializations.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 5,156 records from the hospital's proprietary electronic CME management system. All full-time clinical staff were included. Descriptive statistics quantified annual average participation and credit compliance rates. Chi-square tests (χ²) assessed differences by title and specialty.

Results: The results indicate that over the past five years, both CME participation and credit compliance steadily increased. Significant differences were observed in participation among healthcare professionals with different professional titles (χ 2=38.02, p<0.001), with intermediate-title staff exhibiting the highest participation (98.8%) and junior-title staff the lowest (95.4%). Credit compliance rates also differed significantly among professional titles (χ 2=43.88, p<0.001), with intermediate-title group reaching the highest credit compliance rate (97.1%) and senior consultant-title group the lowest (89.1%). Additionally, there were significant variations in credit compliance rates across different specialties (χ 2=233.10, p<0.001), with nursing professionals at the top (99.3%) and technicians at the bottom (90.6%).

Conclusion: Significant disparities in CME participation and credit compliance were observed across professional titles and clinical specialties. The findings suggest that CME programs should be tailored to the specific needs of different professional groups. These insights provide valuable recommendations for policymakers and hospital administrators seeking to optimizing CME program design, enhancing participation, and improving healthcare quality through continued professional development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Medical Education and Practice
Advances in Medical Education and Practice EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
189
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信