适应周期干预计划(PROCICLOS-A)的有效性及严重程度对言语障碍儿童表现的影响。

IF 0.8 Q4 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
CoDAS Pub Date : 2025-08-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/2317-1782/e20240215pt
Mayra Alexandra Misugi, Daniel Gomes Dos Santos, Carolina Kuntz Ayub, Haydée Fiszbein Wertzner
{"title":"适应周期干预计划(PROCICLOS-A)的有效性及严重程度对言语障碍儿童表现的影响。","authors":"Mayra Alexandra Misugi, Daniel Gomes Dos Santos, Carolina Kuntz Ayub, Haydée Fiszbein Wertzner","doi":"10.1590/2317-1782/e20240215pt","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To verify the efficacy of PROCICLOS-A in children with SSD, according to the weekly frequency of sessions, and the severity's influence on the sessions' performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight children with SSD participated, both sexes, ages between 5:03 and 7:07 years, divided into two groups: C1, once a week; C2, twice a week. The efficacy of PROCICLOS-A was verified in C1 and C2 by analyzing variables from the phonology tests of the ABFW assessment across three evaluation moments. The performance in the sessions was obtained through scoring the activities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All measures significantly differed, indicating improved performance in the evaluations after the intervention. Regarding the influence of the frequency of the sessions, there was no significant difference between C1 and C2 in the three evaluation moments. Blocks of sessions analyzed the performance in the sessions: A (sessions 1, 4, 7, 10), B (sessions 2, 5, 8, 11), C (sessions 3, 6, 9, 12). The analysis revealed lower performance during the sessions of Block A, while Blocks B and C demonstrated better performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study provided evidence for the efficacy of PROCICLOS-A, regardless of the dosage and frequency of sessions. It suggests that maintaining the cumulative intensity of the intervention is vital, indicating that the total number of intervention hours may have a greater impact than the number of sessions held per week. There was an improvement in each child's performance throughout the program, regardless of the target sound and severity at the beginning of the intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":46547,"journal":{"name":"CoDAS","volume":"37 4","pages":"e20240215"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12419458/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of the Adapted Cycles Intervention Program (PROCICLOS-A) and the influence of severity on the performance of children with Speech Sound Disorders.\",\"authors\":\"Mayra Alexandra Misugi, Daniel Gomes Dos Santos, Carolina Kuntz Ayub, Haydée Fiszbein Wertzner\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/2317-1782/e20240215pt\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To verify the efficacy of PROCICLOS-A in children with SSD, according to the weekly frequency of sessions, and the severity's influence on the sessions' performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight children with SSD participated, both sexes, ages between 5:03 and 7:07 years, divided into two groups: C1, once a week; C2, twice a week. The efficacy of PROCICLOS-A was verified in C1 and C2 by analyzing variables from the phonology tests of the ABFW assessment across three evaluation moments. The performance in the sessions was obtained through scoring the activities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All measures significantly differed, indicating improved performance in the evaluations after the intervention. Regarding the influence of the frequency of the sessions, there was no significant difference between C1 and C2 in the three evaluation moments. Blocks of sessions analyzed the performance in the sessions: A (sessions 1, 4, 7, 10), B (sessions 2, 5, 8, 11), C (sessions 3, 6, 9, 12). The analysis revealed lower performance during the sessions of Block A, while Blocks B and C demonstrated better performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study provided evidence for the efficacy of PROCICLOS-A, regardless of the dosage and frequency of sessions. It suggests that maintaining the cumulative intensity of the intervention is vital, indicating that the total number of intervention hours may have a greater impact than the number of sessions held per week. There was an improvement in each child's performance throughout the program, regardless of the target sound and severity at the beginning of the intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CoDAS\",\"volume\":\"37 4\",\"pages\":\"e20240215\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12419458/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CoDAS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/e20240215pt\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CoDAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/e20240215pt","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:根据每周治疗次数及严重程度对治疗效果的影响,验证PROCICLOS-A治疗SSD患儿的疗效。方法:8例SSD患儿,男女均可,年龄在5:03 ~ 7:07岁,分为两组:C1组,每周一次;C2,一周两次。PROCICLOS-A的有效性在C1和C2中通过分析ABFW评估中三个评价时刻的语音测试变量得到验证。会议中的表现是通过对活动进行评分来获得的。结果:各项指标均有显著差异,表明干预后的评估绩效有所提高。对于会话频率的影响,C1和C2在三个评价时刻之间没有显著差异。会话块分析会话中的性能:A(会话1,4,7,10),B(会话2,5,8,11),C(会话3,6,9,12)。分析显示,A组的表现较差,而B组和C组的表现较好。结论:该研究为PROCICLOS-A的有效性提供了证据,无论其剂量和疗程频率如何。它表明,维持干预的累积强度是至关重要的,表明干预的总时数可能比每周举行的会议次数有更大的影响。在整个项目中,无论干预开始时的目标声音和严重程度如何,每个孩子的表现都有所改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Efficacy of the Adapted Cycles Intervention Program (PROCICLOS-A) and the influence of severity on the performance of children with Speech Sound Disorders.

Efficacy of the Adapted Cycles Intervention Program (PROCICLOS-A) and the influence of severity on the performance of children with Speech Sound Disorders.

Efficacy of the Adapted Cycles Intervention Program (PROCICLOS-A) and the influence of severity on the performance of children with Speech Sound Disorders.

Efficacy of the Adapted Cycles Intervention Program (PROCICLOS-A) and the influence of severity on the performance of children with Speech Sound Disorders.

Purpose: To verify the efficacy of PROCICLOS-A in children with SSD, according to the weekly frequency of sessions, and the severity's influence on the sessions' performance.

Methods: Eight children with SSD participated, both sexes, ages between 5:03 and 7:07 years, divided into two groups: C1, once a week; C2, twice a week. The efficacy of PROCICLOS-A was verified in C1 and C2 by analyzing variables from the phonology tests of the ABFW assessment across three evaluation moments. The performance in the sessions was obtained through scoring the activities.

Results: All measures significantly differed, indicating improved performance in the evaluations after the intervention. Regarding the influence of the frequency of the sessions, there was no significant difference between C1 and C2 in the three evaluation moments. Blocks of sessions analyzed the performance in the sessions: A (sessions 1, 4, 7, 10), B (sessions 2, 5, 8, 11), C (sessions 3, 6, 9, 12). The analysis revealed lower performance during the sessions of Block A, while Blocks B and C demonstrated better performance.

Conclusion: The study provided evidence for the efficacy of PROCICLOS-A, regardless of the dosage and frequency of sessions. It suggests that maintaining the cumulative intensity of the intervention is vital, indicating that the total number of intervention hours may have a greater impact than the number of sessions held per week. There was an improvement in each child's performance throughout the program, regardless of the target sound and severity at the beginning of the intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CoDAS
CoDAS AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
103
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信