解决情境化物理问题对男性和女性的影响:心理生理学方法。

IF 3 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Trends in Neuroscience and Education Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-05 DOI:10.1016/j.tine.2025.100268
Isaac Bouhdana, Patrick Charland, Hugo G Lapierre, Lorie-Marlène Brault Foisy, Geneviève Allaire-Duquette, Patrice Potvin, Steve Masson, Martin Riopel, Pierre-Majorique Léger, Shang Lin Chen
{"title":"解决情境化物理问题对男性和女性的影响:心理生理学方法。","authors":"Isaac Bouhdana, Patrick Charland, Hugo G Lapierre, Lorie-Marlène Brault Foisy, Geneviève Allaire-Duquette, Patrice Potvin, Steve Masson, Martin Riopel, Pierre-Majorique Léger, Shang Lin Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.tine.2025.100268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study investigates the psychophysiological effects of contextualized physics problems during the problem's solving stage, expanding upon earlier findings (Bouhdana et al., 2023) on the problem's reading stage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants (university students, both men and women) solved problems presented in three contexts - no context, technical, and humanistic - while measures of cognitive (pupillometry, EEG) and affective (electrodermal activity, valence) situational interest were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Key findings revealed that context significantly influenced pupillometry (p = 0.035) and the context*gender interaction significantly affected valence (p = 0.037), though post-hoc comparisons were not significant. Men exhibited higher emotional valence when solving decontextualized problems compared to humanistic problems, aligning with trends observed during the reading stage, though significance was not maintained in the solving stage (p = 0.096). Notably, cognitive situational interest, as indicated by pupillometry, increased during the solving stage, suggesting a shift from affective to cognitive engagement. However, cognitive situational interest during the solving stage did not predict accuracy, contrasting with our prior findings where affective situational interest (electrodermal activity) during reading significantly predicted accuracy.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This shift may stem from the higher cognitive load associated with problem-solving tasks. These findings suggest that cognitive situational interest during the solving stage is a reflection of cognitive load rather than a predictor of success, while underscoring the importance of fostering affective situational interest during the reading stage to enhance performance and engagement. Future research should explore longitudinal effects, cultural influences on situational interest, and inclusive curriculum design.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results highlight the need for balanced and context-sensitive approaches to curriculum development to optimize student motivation, performance, and long-term interest in physics.</p>","PeriodicalId":46228,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","volume":"40 ","pages":"100268"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of solving contextualized physics problems among men and women: A psychophysiological approach.\",\"authors\":\"Isaac Bouhdana, Patrick Charland, Hugo G Lapierre, Lorie-Marlène Brault Foisy, Geneviève Allaire-Duquette, Patrice Potvin, Steve Masson, Martin Riopel, Pierre-Majorique Léger, Shang Lin Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tine.2025.100268\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study investigates the psychophysiological effects of contextualized physics problems during the problem's solving stage, expanding upon earlier findings (Bouhdana et al., 2023) on the problem's reading stage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants (university students, both men and women) solved problems presented in three contexts - no context, technical, and humanistic - while measures of cognitive (pupillometry, EEG) and affective (electrodermal activity, valence) situational interest were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Key findings revealed that context significantly influenced pupillometry (p = 0.035) and the context*gender interaction significantly affected valence (p = 0.037), though post-hoc comparisons were not significant. Men exhibited higher emotional valence when solving decontextualized problems compared to humanistic problems, aligning with trends observed during the reading stage, though significance was not maintained in the solving stage (p = 0.096). Notably, cognitive situational interest, as indicated by pupillometry, increased during the solving stage, suggesting a shift from affective to cognitive engagement. However, cognitive situational interest during the solving stage did not predict accuracy, contrasting with our prior findings where affective situational interest (electrodermal activity) during reading significantly predicted accuracy.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This shift may stem from the higher cognitive load associated with problem-solving tasks. These findings suggest that cognitive situational interest during the solving stage is a reflection of cognitive load rather than a predictor of success, while underscoring the importance of fostering affective situational interest during the reading stage to enhance performance and engagement. Future research should explore longitudinal effects, cultural influences on situational interest, and inclusive curriculum design.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results highlight the need for balanced and context-sensitive approaches to curriculum development to optimize student motivation, performance, and long-term interest in physics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trends in Neuroscience and Education\",\"volume\":\"40 \",\"pages\":\"100268\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trends in Neuroscience and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2025.100268\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2025.100268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:本研究调查了情境化物理问题在问题解决阶段的心理生理效应,扩展了早期关于问题阅读阶段的研究结果(Bouhdana et al., 2023)。方法:参与者(男女均为大学生)在三种情境下解决问题——无情境、技术情境和人文情境——同时收集认知(瞳孔测量、脑电图)和情感(皮电活动、效价)情境兴趣的测量数据。结果:主要研究结果显示,情境显著影响瞳孔测量(p = 0.035),情境*性别交互作用显著影响效价(p = 0.037),但事后比较无显著性。与人文问题相比,男性在解决非情境化问题时表现出更高的情绪效价,这与阅读阶段观察到的趋势一致,尽管在解决阶段没有保持显著性(p = 0.096)。值得注意的是,正如瞳孔测量所显示的那样,认知情境兴趣在解决问题阶段有所增加,表明从情感参与到认知参与的转变。然而,解决问题阶段的认知情境兴趣并不能预测准确性,这与我们之前的研究结果形成鲜明对比,在阅读过程中,情感情境兴趣(皮肤电活动)显著预测准确性。讨论:这种转变可能源于与解决问题任务相关的更高的认知负荷。这些研究结果表明,在解决阶段的认知情境兴趣是认知负荷的反映,而不是成功的预测因素,同时强调了在阅读阶段培养情感情境兴趣对提高表现和参与的重要性。未来的研究应探讨纵向效应、文化对情境兴趣的影响以及包容性课程设计。结论:我们的研究结果强调了平衡和情境敏感的课程开发方法的必要性,以优化学生的动机、表现和对物理的长期兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of solving contextualized physics problems among men and women: A psychophysiological approach.

Introduction: This study investigates the psychophysiological effects of contextualized physics problems during the problem's solving stage, expanding upon earlier findings (Bouhdana et al., 2023) on the problem's reading stage.

Methods: Participants (university students, both men and women) solved problems presented in three contexts - no context, technical, and humanistic - while measures of cognitive (pupillometry, EEG) and affective (electrodermal activity, valence) situational interest were collected.

Results: Key findings revealed that context significantly influenced pupillometry (p = 0.035) and the context*gender interaction significantly affected valence (p = 0.037), though post-hoc comparisons were not significant. Men exhibited higher emotional valence when solving decontextualized problems compared to humanistic problems, aligning with trends observed during the reading stage, though significance was not maintained in the solving stage (p = 0.096). Notably, cognitive situational interest, as indicated by pupillometry, increased during the solving stage, suggesting a shift from affective to cognitive engagement. However, cognitive situational interest during the solving stage did not predict accuracy, contrasting with our prior findings where affective situational interest (electrodermal activity) during reading significantly predicted accuracy.

Discussion: This shift may stem from the higher cognitive load associated with problem-solving tasks. These findings suggest that cognitive situational interest during the solving stage is a reflection of cognitive load rather than a predictor of success, while underscoring the importance of fostering affective situational interest during the reading stage to enhance performance and engagement. Future research should explore longitudinal effects, cultural influences on situational interest, and inclusive curriculum design.

Conclusion: Our results highlight the need for balanced and context-sensitive approaches to curriculum development to optimize student motivation, performance, and long-term interest in physics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
22
审稿时长
65 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信