护理学院毕业生的实习准备:一项横断面相关研究。

IF 2.5 Q2 NURSING
SAGE Open Nursing Pub Date : 2025-08-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23779608251371497
Kim Jihye, Lee Kyungmi
{"title":"护理学院毕业生的实习准备:一项横断面相关研究。","authors":"Kim Jihye, Lee Kyungmi","doi":"10.1177/23779608251371497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Nursing college education aims to provide students with professional competence in nursing care practices (e.g., critical thinking, problem-solving, and clinical evaluation knowledge). The practice readiness of nursing college graduates is crucial for new nurses' successful role transition.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the practice readiness of nursing college graduates in Korea and explore related factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted using convenience sampling. Participants were newly licensed nurses who graduated from 10 nursing colleges in South Korea in 2023 and had not yet begun clinical practice. Inclusion criteria were: age 20-30 years, possession of a nursing license, and informed consent to participate. Individuals with psychiatric histories or clinical work experience were excluded. The required sample size was calculated as 172; 178 participants were included. Study instruments included the Tromsø Social Intelligence Scale, the Korean Undergraduate Clinical Education Environment Measure, and the Korean version of the Readiness for Practice Survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall mean score for practice readiness was 2.81 ± 0.37. Among subfactors, professional identity scored highest (2.96 ± 0.47), while trials and tribulations scored lowest (2.61 ± 0.45). Social intelligence (<i>r</i> = .61, <i>p</i> < .001) and clinical education environment (<i>r</i> = .53, <i>p</i> < .001) were positively correlated with practice readiness. In the final regression model, satisfaction with simulation practice (β = .20, <i>P</i> = .001), satisfaction with overall university education (β = .15, <i>p</i> = .041), social intelligence (β = .49, <i>p</i> < .001), and clinical education environment (β = .28, <i>p</i> < .001) were significant factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Enhancing social intelligence and satisfaction with simulation and overall educational experiences are key to improving graduates' readiness for clinical practice. Investing in high-quality clinical environments and simulation programs may foster smoother transitions to professional nursing roles. These findings highlight the need for curriculum and policy initiatives that support individual development and systemic improvements in nursing education.</p>","PeriodicalId":43312,"journal":{"name":"SAGE Open Nursing","volume":"11 ","pages":"23779608251371497"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12378298/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Readiness for Practice Among Nursing College Graduates: A Cross-Sectional Correlation Study.\",\"authors\":\"Kim Jihye, Lee Kyungmi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23779608251371497\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Nursing college education aims to provide students with professional competence in nursing care practices (e.g., critical thinking, problem-solving, and clinical evaluation knowledge). The practice readiness of nursing college graduates is crucial for new nurses' successful role transition.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the practice readiness of nursing college graduates in Korea and explore related factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted using convenience sampling. Participants were newly licensed nurses who graduated from 10 nursing colleges in South Korea in 2023 and had not yet begun clinical practice. Inclusion criteria were: age 20-30 years, possession of a nursing license, and informed consent to participate. Individuals with psychiatric histories or clinical work experience were excluded. The required sample size was calculated as 172; 178 participants were included. Study instruments included the Tromsø Social Intelligence Scale, the Korean Undergraduate Clinical Education Environment Measure, and the Korean version of the Readiness for Practice Survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall mean score for practice readiness was 2.81 ± 0.37. Among subfactors, professional identity scored highest (2.96 ± 0.47), while trials and tribulations scored lowest (2.61 ± 0.45). Social intelligence (<i>r</i> = .61, <i>p</i> < .001) and clinical education environment (<i>r</i> = .53, <i>p</i> < .001) were positively correlated with practice readiness. In the final regression model, satisfaction with simulation practice (β = .20, <i>P</i> = .001), satisfaction with overall university education (β = .15, <i>p</i> = .041), social intelligence (β = .49, <i>p</i> < .001), and clinical education environment (β = .28, <i>p</i> < .001) were significant factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Enhancing social intelligence and satisfaction with simulation and overall educational experiences are key to improving graduates' readiness for clinical practice. Investing in high-quality clinical environments and simulation programs may foster smoother transitions to professional nursing roles. These findings highlight the need for curriculum and policy initiatives that support individual development and systemic improvements in nursing education.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SAGE Open Nursing\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"23779608251371497\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12378298/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SAGE Open Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608251371497\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAGE Open Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608251371497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:护理学院教育旨在培养学生在护理实践中的专业能力(如批判性思维、解决问题的能力和临床评估知识)。护理学院毕业生的实践准备对新护士的成功角色转换至关重要。目的:了解韩国护理学院毕业生的实习准备情况并探讨相关因素。方法:采用方便抽样方法进行横断面描述性研究。参与者是2023年从韩国10所护理学院毕业、尚未开始临床实践的新持牌护士。纳入标准为:年龄20-30岁,持有护理执照,知情同意参与。排除有精神病史或临床工作经验的个体。所需样本量计算为172;共纳入178名参与者。研究工具包括特罗姆瑟社会智力量表、韩国本科临床教育环境量表和韩国版的实践准备调查。结果:练习准备总平均得分为2.81±0.37。在各子因素中,职业认同得分最高(2.96±0.47),考验和磨难得分最低(2.61±0.45)。社会智力(r =。61, p r =。53、p p =。001),对整体大学教育的满意度(β =。15, p =。041),社会智力(β =。结论:提高社会智力、模拟满意度和整体教育体验是提高毕业生临床实习准备水平的关键。投资于高质量的临床环境和模拟程序可以促进更顺利地过渡到专业护理角色。这些发现强调了课程和政策举措的必要性,以支持护理教育的个人发展和系统改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Readiness for Practice Among Nursing College Graduates: A Cross-Sectional Correlation Study.

Readiness for Practice Among Nursing College Graduates: A Cross-Sectional Correlation Study.

Readiness for Practice Among Nursing College Graduates: A Cross-Sectional Correlation Study.

Readiness for Practice Among Nursing College Graduates: A Cross-Sectional Correlation Study.

Introduction: Nursing college education aims to provide students with professional competence in nursing care practices (e.g., critical thinking, problem-solving, and clinical evaluation knowledge). The practice readiness of nursing college graduates is crucial for new nurses' successful role transition.

Objective: To determine the practice readiness of nursing college graduates in Korea and explore related factors.

Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted using convenience sampling. Participants were newly licensed nurses who graduated from 10 nursing colleges in South Korea in 2023 and had not yet begun clinical practice. Inclusion criteria were: age 20-30 years, possession of a nursing license, and informed consent to participate. Individuals with psychiatric histories or clinical work experience were excluded. The required sample size was calculated as 172; 178 participants were included. Study instruments included the Tromsø Social Intelligence Scale, the Korean Undergraduate Clinical Education Environment Measure, and the Korean version of the Readiness for Practice Survey.

Results: The overall mean score for practice readiness was 2.81 ± 0.37. Among subfactors, professional identity scored highest (2.96 ± 0.47), while trials and tribulations scored lowest (2.61 ± 0.45). Social intelligence (r = .61, p < .001) and clinical education environment (r = .53, p < .001) were positively correlated with practice readiness. In the final regression model, satisfaction with simulation practice (β = .20, P = .001), satisfaction with overall university education (β = .15, p = .041), social intelligence (β = .49, p < .001), and clinical education environment (β = .28, p < .001) were significant factors.

Conclusion: Enhancing social intelligence and satisfaction with simulation and overall educational experiences are key to improving graduates' readiness for clinical practice. Investing in high-quality clinical environments and simulation programs may foster smoother transitions to professional nursing roles. These findings highlight the need for curriculum and policy initiatives that support individual development and systemic improvements in nursing education.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
106
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信