吸盘把手在典型的沐浴条件和墙壁材料的实验室评估中效率较低。

IF 2 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Hanaan H Z Deen, Iris C Levine, Roger E Montgomery, Steven Pong, Alison C Novak
{"title":"吸盘把手在典型的沐浴条件和墙壁材料的实验室评估中效率较低。","authors":"Hanaan H Z Deen, Iris C Levine, Roger E Montgomery, Steven Pong, Alison C Novak","doi":"10.1177/20556683251370322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Suction cup handholds are sometimes recommended by Occupational Therapists for bathing transfers when permanent grab bars are not feasible. The efficacy of suction cup handholds on typical bathroom surfaces is unknown.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluated the efficacy and failure characteristics of two brands of suction cup handholds on six typical bathtub wall surfaces, under environmental and loading conditions associated with bathing.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Eighteen suction cup handholds underwent controlled longevity testing under wet and dry conditions in separate sessions. Handhold efficacy was evaluated through (a) visual inspection, (b) manual manipulation, and (c) controlled loading, with days to failure and other failure details as outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>No handhold-wall sample combinations were effective over the 28 day test period, with at least one handhold on each wall sample failing on day one. Handhold failure was most frequently due to sliding along the wall surface, and occurred most frequently during manual manipulation testing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Handhold efficacy was poor in a controlled experimental environment. These results can inform clinicians of the risks suction cup handholds pose and assist in clinical recommendations against their use.</p>","PeriodicalId":43319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","volume":"12 ","pages":"20556683251370322"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12379541/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Suction cup handholds have low efficacy in laboratory evaluation with typical bathing conditions and wall materials.\",\"authors\":\"Hanaan H Z Deen, Iris C Levine, Roger E Montgomery, Steven Pong, Alison C Novak\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20556683251370322\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Suction cup handholds are sometimes recommended by Occupational Therapists for bathing transfers when permanent grab bars are not feasible. The efficacy of suction cup handholds on typical bathroom surfaces is unknown.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluated the efficacy and failure characteristics of two brands of suction cup handholds on six typical bathtub wall surfaces, under environmental and loading conditions associated with bathing.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Eighteen suction cup handholds underwent controlled longevity testing under wet and dry conditions in separate sessions. Handhold efficacy was evaluated through (a) visual inspection, (b) manual manipulation, and (c) controlled loading, with days to failure and other failure details as outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>No handhold-wall sample combinations were effective over the 28 day test period, with at least one handhold on each wall sample failing on day one. Handhold failure was most frequently due to sliding along the wall surface, and occurred most frequently during manual manipulation testing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Handhold efficacy was poor in a controlled experimental environment. These results can inform clinicians of the risks suction cup handholds pose and assist in clinical recommendations against their use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"20556683251370322\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12379541/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20556683251370322\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20556683251370322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:职业治疗师有时会在无法使用永久抓握杆的情况下,推荐使用吸盘来转移沐浴。吸盘把手对典型浴室表面的功效尚不清楚。目的:本研究评估了两种品牌的吸盘把手在六种典型浴缸壁面上的效能和失效特征,以及与沐浴相关的环境和负载条件。方法:对18个吸盘手柄分别在干湿条件下进行对照寿命试验。通过(a)目视检查,(b)手动操作和(c)控制加载,以故障天数和其他故障细节作为结果测量来评估手柄的有效性。结果:在28天的测试期内,没有任何把手-墙壁样品组合是有效的,每个墙壁样品上至少有一个把手在第一天失效。手柄故障最常见的原因是沿壁面滑动,并且在手动操作测试中最常见。结论:在可控的实验环境下,手持效果较差。这些结果可以告知临床医生的风险吸盘握持姿势,并协助临床建议反对他们的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Suction cup handholds have low efficacy in laboratory evaluation with typical bathing conditions and wall materials.

Suction cup handholds have low efficacy in laboratory evaluation with typical bathing conditions and wall materials.

Suction cup handholds have low efficacy in laboratory evaluation with typical bathing conditions and wall materials.

Suction cup handholds have low efficacy in laboratory evaluation with typical bathing conditions and wall materials.

Background: Suction cup handholds are sometimes recommended by Occupational Therapists for bathing transfers when permanent grab bars are not feasible. The efficacy of suction cup handholds on typical bathroom surfaces is unknown.

Purpose: This study evaluated the efficacy and failure characteristics of two brands of suction cup handholds on six typical bathtub wall surfaces, under environmental and loading conditions associated with bathing.

Method: Eighteen suction cup handholds underwent controlled longevity testing under wet and dry conditions in separate sessions. Handhold efficacy was evaluated through (a) visual inspection, (b) manual manipulation, and (c) controlled loading, with days to failure and other failure details as outcome measures.

Findings: No handhold-wall sample combinations were effective over the 28 day test period, with at least one handhold on each wall sample failing on day one. Handhold failure was most frequently due to sliding along the wall surface, and occurred most frequently during manual manipulation testing.

Conclusion: Handhold efficacy was poor in a controlled experimental environment. These results can inform clinicians of the risks suction cup handholds pose and assist in clinical recommendations against their use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信