气管深吸与浅吸对机械通气患者心血管指标及吸入并发症的影响。

IF 2.5 Q2 NURSING
SAGE Open Nursing Pub Date : 2025-08-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23779608251374140
Mona Mohamed El-Hady, Lisa Babkair, Ruba M Alharazi, Sohad Mohammad Wally Noorsaeed, Marwa Mehrez Mahmoud Ali
{"title":"气管深吸与浅吸对机械通气患者心血管指标及吸入并发症的影响。","authors":"Mona Mohamed El-Hady, Lisa Babkair, Ruba M Alharazi, Sohad Mohammad Wally Noorsaeed, Marwa Mehrez Mahmoud Ali","doi":"10.1177/23779608251374140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tracheal suctioning is a critical component of care for mechanically ventilated patients' treatment. The effectiveness and associated complications of suctioning can vary depending on the depth of catheter insertion. Although several guidelines assist nurses in selecting the appropriate suctioning technique, while the optimal suctioning depth remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Purpose of the research: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the impact of implementing shallow (insertion of the suction catheter to a depth limited to the end of the endotracheal tube) versus deep tracheal suctioning (insertion of the suction catheter approximately 1 cm above carina) techniques on cardiovascular indices and suction-induced complications among mechanically ventilated patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized controlled trial (RCT) with two parallel groups at a 1:1 ratio was carried out in Intensive care units of a tertiary hospital. Adult mechanically ventilated patients requiring tracheal suctioning were randomly assigned to either the shallow tracheal suctioning group (intervention) or the deep tracheal suctioning group (control). Cardiovascular indices (such as heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation) and suction-induced complications (as hypoxemia, cardiac dysrhythmia, tracheal tissue injury, and increased intracranial pressure) were assessed at four specific times: before suctioning, immediately after suctioning, 5 min postsuctioning, and 10 min postsuctioning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 120 patients were enrolled in the study. Cardiovascular indices increased significantly following tracheal suctioning in the deep suctioning group compared to the shallow suctioning group (<i>p</i> < .05). Additionally, the incidence of suction-related complications was significantly lower in the shallow suctioning group (<i>p</i> < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Shallow tracheal suctioning results in less pronounced alterations in cardiovascular indices and fewer suction-induced complications compared to deep suctioning. These findings support the adoption of shallow suctioing as a safer and more favorable technique for managing mechanically ventilated patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":43312,"journal":{"name":"SAGE Open Nursing","volume":"11 ","pages":"23779608251374140"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12397608/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Deep Versus Shallow Tracheal Suctioning on Cardiovascular Indices and Suction Induced Complications Among Mechanically Ventilated Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Mona Mohamed El-Hady, Lisa Babkair, Ruba M Alharazi, Sohad Mohammad Wally Noorsaeed, Marwa Mehrez Mahmoud Ali\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23779608251374140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tracheal suctioning is a critical component of care for mechanically ventilated patients' treatment. The effectiveness and associated complications of suctioning can vary depending on the depth of catheter insertion. Although several guidelines assist nurses in selecting the appropriate suctioning technique, while the optimal suctioning depth remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Purpose of the research: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the impact of implementing shallow (insertion of the suction catheter to a depth limited to the end of the endotracheal tube) versus deep tracheal suctioning (insertion of the suction catheter approximately 1 cm above carina) techniques on cardiovascular indices and suction-induced complications among mechanically ventilated patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized controlled trial (RCT) with two parallel groups at a 1:1 ratio was carried out in Intensive care units of a tertiary hospital. Adult mechanically ventilated patients requiring tracheal suctioning were randomly assigned to either the shallow tracheal suctioning group (intervention) or the deep tracheal suctioning group (control). Cardiovascular indices (such as heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation) and suction-induced complications (as hypoxemia, cardiac dysrhythmia, tracheal tissue injury, and increased intracranial pressure) were assessed at four specific times: before suctioning, immediately after suctioning, 5 min postsuctioning, and 10 min postsuctioning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 120 patients were enrolled in the study. Cardiovascular indices increased significantly following tracheal suctioning in the deep suctioning group compared to the shallow suctioning group (<i>p</i> < .05). Additionally, the incidence of suction-related complications was significantly lower in the shallow suctioning group (<i>p</i> < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Shallow tracheal suctioning results in less pronounced alterations in cardiovascular indices and fewer suction-induced complications compared to deep suctioning. These findings support the adoption of shallow suctioing as a safer and more favorable technique for managing mechanically ventilated patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SAGE Open Nursing\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"23779608251374140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12397608/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SAGE Open Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608251374140\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAGE Open Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608251374140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:气管吸引是机械通气患者治疗护理的重要组成部分。吸痰的效果和相关并发症可能因导管插入的深度而异。虽然有一些指南帮助护士选择合适的吸引技术,但最佳的吸引深度仍然不确定。研究目的:本研究旨在评估在机械通气患者中实施浅吸(将吸入导管插入深度限制在气管内管末端)与深吸(将吸入导管插入隆突上方约1cm)技术对心血管指标和吸入引起的并发症的影响。方法:在某三级医院重症监护室采用随机对照试验(RCT),两组患者按1:1的比例进行对照。需要气管吸引的成人机械通气患者随机分为浅气管吸引组(干预组)和深气管吸引组(对照组)。在4个特定时间评估心血管指标(如心率、血压、呼吸频率和血氧饱和度)和吸痰引起的并发症(如低氧血症、心律失常、气管组织损伤和颅内压升高):吸痰前、吸痰后立即、吸痰后5分钟和吸痰后10分钟。结果:共有120例患者入组。与浅吸痰组相比,深吸痰组的心血管指标明显升高(p p)。结论:浅吸痰对心血管指标的影响较浅吸痰组要小,引起的并发症也较少。这些发现支持采用浅吸痰作为一种更安全、更有利的技术来管理机械通气患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Impact of Deep Versus Shallow Tracheal Suctioning on Cardiovascular Indices and Suction Induced Complications Among Mechanically Ventilated Patients.

Impact of Deep Versus Shallow Tracheal Suctioning on Cardiovascular Indices and Suction Induced Complications Among Mechanically Ventilated Patients.

Impact of Deep Versus Shallow Tracheal Suctioning on Cardiovascular Indices and Suction Induced Complications Among Mechanically Ventilated Patients.

Impact of Deep Versus Shallow Tracheal Suctioning on Cardiovascular Indices and Suction Induced Complications Among Mechanically Ventilated Patients.

Background: Tracheal suctioning is a critical component of care for mechanically ventilated patients' treatment. The effectiveness and associated complications of suctioning can vary depending on the depth of catheter insertion. Although several guidelines assist nurses in selecting the appropriate suctioning technique, while the optimal suctioning depth remains uncertain.

Purpose of the research: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of implementing shallow (insertion of the suction catheter to a depth limited to the end of the endotracheal tube) versus deep tracheal suctioning (insertion of the suction catheter approximately 1 cm above carina) techniques on cardiovascular indices and suction-induced complications among mechanically ventilated patients.

Methods: A randomized controlled trial (RCT) with two parallel groups at a 1:1 ratio was carried out in Intensive care units of a tertiary hospital. Adult mechanically ventilated patients requiring tracheal suctioning were randomly assigned to either the shallow tracheal suctioning group (intervention) or the deep tracheal suctioning group (control). Cardiovascular indices (such as heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation) and suction-induced complications (as hypoxemia, cardiac dysrhythmia, tracheal tissue injury, and increased intracranial pressure) were assessed at four specific times: before suctioning, immediately after suctioning, 5 min postsuctioning, and 10 min postsuctioning.

Results: A total of 120 patients were enrolled in the study. Cardiovascular indices increased significantly following tracheal suctioning in the deep suctioning group compared to the shallow suctioning group (p < .05). Additionally, the incidence of suction-related complications was significantly lower in the shallow suctioning group (p < .05).

Conclusions: Shallow tracheal suctioning results in less pronounced alterations in cardiovascular indices and fewer suction-induced complications compared to deep suctioning. These findings support the adoption of shallow suctioing as a safer and more favorable technique for managing mechanically ventilated patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
106
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信