Daniel Garcia-Gutiérrez, Estel la Ramírez-Baraldes, Maria Orera, Verónica Seidel, Carmen Martínez, Cristina García-Salido
{"title":"通过标准化患者临床模拟提高护理学生基因组素养:一项混合方法研究。","authors":"Daniel Garcia-Gutiérrez, Estel la Ramírez-Baraldes, Maria Orera, Verónica Seidel, Carmen Martínez, Cristina García-Salido","doi":"10.3390/nursrep15080297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Genomic information is becoming integral to nursing practice, yet undergraduate curricula often provide limited opportunities to apply this knowledge in realistic settings. <b>Objective</b>: To evaluate the impact of a clinical simulation-based intervention on nursing students' learning of genetic counseling, with a focus on knowledge acquisition, communication skills, and student satisfaction. <b>Methods</b>: A sequential mixed-methods study was conducted with 30 third-year nursing students enrolled in the elective Genetics Applied to Health Sciences. Quantitative data comprised (i) pre-/post-simulation knowledge tests, (ii) a satisfaction questionnaire, and (iii) final course grades, which were compared with grades of a cohort from the previous academic year that had no simulation component (n = 28). Qualitative insights were gathered through field notes and semi-structured interviews with six purposively selected participants. During the intervention each student rotated through the roles of genetic-counseling nurse, patient, and observer, followed by a facilitated debriefing. <b>Results</b>: Post-simulation knowledge scores and final course grades were significantly higher than both baseline values and the historical comparison cohort. Students reported very high satisfaction, highlighting the authenticity of the scenarios and the usefulness of immediate feedback. Qualitative analysis showed that role rotation fostered deeper understanding of counseling complexities, improved empathic communication, and bolstered self-confidence when discussing hereditary risk. <b>Conclusions</b>: Embedding standardized-patient simulation into undergraduate genetics courses measurably improves students' knowledge, communication proficiency, and satisfaction. These findings support incorporating similar simulation-based learning activities to bridge the gap between theoretical genetics content and real-world nursing practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"15 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12388744/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Boosted Genomic Literacy in Nursing Students via Standardized-Patient Clinical Simulation: A Mixed-Methods Study.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Garcia-Gutiérrez, Estel la Ramírez-Baraldes, Maria Orera, Verónica Seidel, Carmen Martínez, Cristina García-Salido\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/nursrep15080297\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Genomic information is becoming integral to nursing practice, yet undergraduate curricula often provide limited opportunities to apply this knowledge in realistic settings. <b>Objective</b>: To evaluate the impact of a clinical simulation-based intervention on nursing students' learning of genetic counseling, with a focus on knowledge acquisition, communication skills, and student satisfaction. <b>Methods</b>: A sequential mixed-methods study was conducted with 30 third-year nursing students enrolled in the elective Genetics Applied to Health Sciences. Quantitative data comprised (i) pre-/post-simulation knowledge tests, (ii) a satisfaction questionnaire, and (iii) final course grades, which were compared with grades of a cohort from the previous academic year that had no simulation component (n = 28). Qualitative insights were gathered through field notes and semi-structured interviews with six purposively selected participants. During the intervention each student rotated through the roles of genetic-counseling nurse, patient, and observer, followed by a facilitated debriefing. <b>Results</b>: Post-simulation knowledge scores and final course grades were significantly higher than both baseline values and the historical comparison cohort. Students reported very high satisfaction, highlighting the authenticity of the scenarios and the usefulness of immediate feedback. Qualitative analysis showed that role rotation fostered deeper understanding of counseling complexities, improved empathic communication, and bolstered self-confidence when discussing hereditary risk. <b>Conclusions</b>: Embedding standardized-patient simulation into undergraduate genetics courses measurably improves students' knowledge, communication proficiency, and satisfaction. These findings support incorporating similar simulation-based learning activities to bridge the gap between theoretical genetics content and real-world nursing practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12388744/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15080297\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15080297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Boosted Genomic Literacy in Nursing Students via Standardized-Patient Clinical Simulation: A Mixed-Methods Study.
Background: Genomic information is becoming integral to nursing practice, yet undergraduate curricula often provide limited opportunities to apply this knowledge in realistic settings. Objective: To evaluate the impact of a clinical simulation-based intervention on nursing students' learning of genetic counseling, with a focus on knowledge acquisition, communication skills, and student satisfaction. Methods: A sequential mixed-methods study was conducted with 30 third-year nursing students enrolled in the elective Genetics Applied to Health Sciences. Quantitative data comprised (i) pre-/post-simulation knowledge tests, (ii) a satisfaction questionnaire, and (iii) final course grades, which were compared with grades of a cohort from the previous academic year that had no simulation component (n = 28). Qualitative insights were gathered through field notes and semi-structured interviews with six purposively selected participants. During the intervention each student rotated through the roles of genetic-counseling nurse, patient, and observer, followed by a facilitated debriefing. Results: Post-simulation knowledge scores and final course grades were significantly higher than both baseline values and the historical comparison cohort. Students reported very high satisfaction, highlighting the authenticity of the scenarios and the usefulness of immediate feedback. Qualitative analysis showed that role rotation fostered deeper understanding of counseling complexities, improved empathic communication, and bolstered self-confidence when discussing hereditary risk. Conclusions: Embedding standardized-patient simulation into undergraduate genetics courses measurably improves students' knowledge, communication proficiency, and satisfaction. These findings support incorporating similar simulation-based learning activities to bridge the gap between theoretical genetics content and real-world nursing practice.
期刊介绍:
Nursing Reports is an open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives. The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses. Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility. Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.