通过标准化患者临床模拟提高护理学生基因组素养:一项混合方法研究。

IF 2 Q1 NURSING
Daniel Garcia-Gutiérrez, Estel la Ramírez-Baraldes, Maria Orera, Verónica Seidel, Carmen Martínez, Cristina García-Salido
{"title":"通过标准化患者临床模拟提高护理学生基因组素养:一项混合方法研究。","authors":"Daniel Garcia-Gutiérrez, Estel la Ramírez-Baraldes, Maria Orera, Verónica Seidel, Carmen Martínez, Cristina García-Salido","doi":"10.3390/nursrep15080297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Genomic information is becoming integral to nursing practice, yet undergraduate curricula often provide limited opportunities to apply this knowledge in realistic settings. <b>Objective</b>: To evaluate the impact of a clinical simulation-based intervention on nursing students' learning of genetic counseling, with a focus on knowledge acquisition, communication skills, and student satisfaction. <b>Methods</b>: A sequential mixed-methods study was conducted with 30 third-year nursing students enrolled in the elective Genetics Applied to Health Sciences. Quantitative data comprised (i) pre-/post-simulation knowledge tests, (ii) a satisfaction questionnaire, and (iii) final course grades, which were compared with grades of a cohort from the previous academic year that had no simulation component (n = 28). Qualitative insights were gathered through field notes and semi-structured interviews with six purposively selected participants. During the intervention each student rotated through the roles of genetic-counseling nurse, patient, and observer, followed by a facilitated debriefing. <b>Results</b>: Post-simulation knowledge scores and final course grades were significantly higher than both baseline values and the historical comparison cohort. Students reported very high satisfaction, highlighting the authenticity of the scenarios and the usefulness of immediate feedback. Qualitative analysis showed that role rotation fostered deeper understanding of counseling complexities, improved empathic communication, and bolstered self-confidence when discussing hereditary risk. <b>Conclusions</b>: Embedding standardized-patient simulation into undergraduate genetics courses measurably improves students' knowledge, communication proficiency, and satisfaction. These findings support incorporating similar simulation-based learning activities to bridge the gap between theoretical genetics content and real-world nursing practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"15 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12388744/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Boosted Genomic Literacy in Nursing Students via Standardized-Patient Clinical Simulation: A Mixed-Methods Study.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Garcia-Gutiérrez, Estel la Ramírez-Baraldes, Maria Orera, Verónica Seidel, Carmen Martínez, Cristina García-Salido\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/nursrep15080297\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Genomic information is becoming integral to nursing practice, yet undergraduate curricula often provide limited opportunities to apply this knowledge in realistic settings. <b>Objective</b>: To evaluate the impact of a clinical simulation-based intervention on nursing students' learning of genetic counseling, with a focus on knowledge acquisition, communication skills, and student satisfaction. <b>Methods</b>: A sequential mixed-methods study was conducted with 30 third-year nursing students enrolled in the elective Genetics Applied to Health Sciences. Quantitative data comprised (i) pre-/post-simulation knowledge tests, (ii) a satisfaction questionnaire, and (iii) final course grades, which were compared with grades of a cohort from the previous academic year that had no simulation component (n = 28). Qualitative insights were gathered through field notes and semi-structured interviews with six purposively selected participants. During the intervention each student rotated through the roles of genetic-counseling nurse, patient, and observer, followed by a facilitated debriefing. <b>Results</b>: Post-simulation knowledge scores and final course grades were significantly higher than both baseline values and the historical comparison cohort. Students reported very high satisfaction, highlighting the authenticity of the scenarios and the usefulness of immediate feedback. Qualitative analysis showed that role rotation fostered deeper understanding of counseling complexities, improved empathic communication, and bolstered self-confidence when discussing hereditary risk. <b>Conclusions</b>: Embedding standardized-patient simulation into undergraduate genetics courses measurably improves students' knowledge, communication proficiency, and satisfaction. These findings support incorporating similar simulation-based learning activities to bridge the gap between theoretical genetics content and real-world nursing practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12388744/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15080297\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15080297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:基因组信息正在成为护理实践不可或缺的一部分,然而本科课程通常提供有限的机会将这些知识应用于现实环境。目的:评估基于临床模拟的干预对护生遗传咨询学习的影响,重点关注知识获取、沟通技巧和学生满意度。方法:采用顺序混合方法对30名选修遗传学应用于健康科学的护理专业三年级学生进行研究。定量数据包括(i)模拟前/模拟后的知识测试,(ii)满意度问卷,以及(iii)期末课程成绩,这些成绩与上一学年没有模拟成分的队列的成绩进行比较(n = 28)。定性的见解是通过实地笔记和半结构化的访谈,有目的地选择六名参与者收集。在干预期间,每个学生轮流扮演遗传咨询护士、病人和观察员的角色,随后是一个便利的汇报。结果:模拟后的知识得分和期末成绩显著高于基线值和历史比较队列。学生们报告了非常高的满意度,强调了场景的真实性和即时反馈的有效性。定性分析表明,角色轮换有助于加深对咨询复杂性的理解,改善移情沟通,并在讨论遗传风险时增强自信。结论:在本科遗传学课程中嵌入标准化患者模拟,可显著提高学生的知识水平、沟通能力和满意度。这些发现支持结合类似的模拟学习活动,以弥合理论遗传学内容和现实世界护理实践之间的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Boosted Genomic Literacy in Nursing Students via Standardized-Patient Clinical Simulation: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Boosted Genomic Literacy in Nursing Students via Standardized-Patient Clinical Simulation: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Boosted Genomic Literacy in Nursing Students via Standardized-Patient Clinical Simulation: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Background: Genomic information is becoming integral to nursing practice, yet undergraduate curricula often provide limited opportunities to apply this knowledge in realistic settings. Objective: To evaluate the impact of a clinical simulation-based intervention on nursing students' learning of genetic counseling, with a focus on knowledge acquisition, communication skills, and student satisfaction. Methods: A sequential mixed-methods study was conducted with 30 third-year nursing students enrolled in the elective Genetics Applied to Health Sciences. Quantitative data comprised (i) pre-/post-simulation knowledge tests, (ii) a satisfaction questionnaire, and (iii) final course grades, which were compared with grades of a cohort from the previous academic year that had no simulation component (n = 28). Qualitative insights were gathered through field notes and semi-structured interviews with six purposively selected participants. During the intervention each student rotated through the roles of genetic-counseling nurse, patient, and observer, followed by a facilitated debriefing. Results: Post-simulation knowledge scores and final course grades were significantly higher than both baseline values and the historical comparison cohort. Students reported very high satisfaction, highlighting the authenticity of the scenarios and the usefulness of immediate feedback. Qualitative analysis showed that role rotation fostered deeper understanding of counseling complexities, improved empathic communication, and bolstered self-confidence when discussing hereditary risk. Conclusions: Embedding standardized-patient simulation into undergraduate genetics courses measurably improves students' knowledge, communication proficiency, and satisfaction. These findings support incorporating similar simulation-based learning activities to bridge the gap between theoretical genetics content and real-world nursing practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Reports
Nursing Reports NURSING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Nursing Reports is an open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives. The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses. Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility. Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信