实体器官移植后自我管理的各个方面-范围综述。

IF 2 Q1 NURSING
Stefan Jobst, Christiane Kugler, Anne Rebafka
{"title":"实体器官移植后自我管理的各个方面-范围综述。","authors":"Stefan Jobst, Christiane Kugler, Anne Rebafka","doi":"10.3390/nursrep15080304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Solid organ transplantation improves survival and quality of life but requires lifelong self-management. While models exist for kidney and liver recipients, a comprehensive framework for all solid organ transplant recipients is lacking. Addressing this gap is essential for optimizing post-transplant care. <b>Objectives</b>: This report aims to conceptualize self-management after solid organ transplantation by addressing questions related to (1) the contexts studied to date, (2) research methodologies and publication types used, and (3) core aspects associated with self-management post-transplantation. <b>Methods</b>: A scoping review was used to address the above objectives. A comprehensive search strategy identified relevant studies, followed by systematic screening, data extraction, and qualitative content analysis. Findings were categorized using a deductive-inductive coding approach to map core self-management aspects after solid organ transplantation. <b>Results</b>: The search yielded 34,417 records, with 742 ultimately included. Publications from 43 countries spanned 43 years, with many (48.9%) published after 2016. Research articles dominated (80.1%), covering kidney (61%), liver (22%), heart (21%), and lung (16%) transplants. A qualitative analysis identified four self-management domains containing various categories: (1) Managing the medical-therapeutic regimen, (2) managing biographical work, (3) managing (new) life roles, and (4) generic self-management skills. The conceptual model illustrates their interconnections, with aspects of the medical-therapeutic regimen management most frequently covered. <b>Conclusions</b>: Self-management after solid organ transplantation is complex, involving medical-therapeutic, emotional, social, and behavioral aspects. Aspects of managing the medical-therapeutic regimen dominate the research literature, while other aspects need further exploration. Future studies should address gaps to support holistic, patient-centered post-transplant care strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"15 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12389569/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aspects of Self-Management After Solid Organ Transplantation-A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Stefan Jobst, Christiane Kugler, Anne Rebafka\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/nursrep15080304\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Solid organ transplantation improves survival and quality of life but requires lifelong self-management. While models exist for kidney and liver recipients, a comprehensive framework for all solid organ transplant recipients is lacking. Addressing this gap is essential for optimizing post-transplant care. <b>Objectives</b>: This report aims to conceptualize self-management after solid organ transplantation by addressing questions related to (1) the contexts studied to date, (2) research methodologies and publication types used, and (3) core aspects associated with self-management post-transplantation. <b>Methods</b>: A scoping review was used to address the above objectives. A comprehensive search strategy identified relevant studies, followed by systematic screening, data extraction, and qualitative content analysis. Findings were categorized using a deductive-inductive coding approach to map core self-management aspects after solid organ transplantation. <b>Results</b>: The search yielded 34,417 records, with 742 ultimately included. Publications from 43 countries spanned 43 years, with many (48.9%) published after 2016. Research articles dominated (80.1%), covering kidney (61%), liver (22%), heart (21%), and lung (16%) transplants. A qualitative analysis identified four self-management domains containing various categories: (1) Managing the medical-therapeutic regimen, (2) managing biographical work, (3) managing (new) life roles, and (4) generic self-management skills. The conceptual model illustrates their interconnections, with aspects of the medical-therapeutic regimen management most frequently covered. <b>Conclusions</b>: Self-management after solid organ transplantation is complex, involving medical-therapeutic, emotional, social, and behavioral aspects. Aspects of managing the medical-therapeutic regimen dominate the research literature, while other aspects need further exploration. Future studies should address gaps to support holistic, patient-centered post-transplant care strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12389569/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15080304\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15080304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:实体器官移植可提高生存和生活质量,但需要终生自我管理。虽然存在肾脏和肝脏受体的模型,但缺乏所有实体器官移植受体的综合框架。解决这一差距对于优化移植后护理至关重要。目的:本报告旨在通过解决以下问题来概念化实体器官移植后的自我管理:(1)迄今为止研究的背景,(2)研究方法和使用的出版物类型,以及(3)与移植后自我管理相关的核心方面。方法:采用范围审查来解决上述目标。综合搜索策略确定相关研究,然后进行系统筛选、数据提取和定性内容分析。使用演绎-归纳编码方法对结果进行分类,以映射实体器官移植后的核心自我管理方面。结果:搜索产生了34,417条记录,其中742条最终包含在内。来自43个国家的出版物跨越了43年,其中许多(48.9%)出版于2016年之后。研究论文占主导地位(80.1%),包括肾移植(61%)、肝移植(22%)、心脏移植(21%)和肺移植(16%)。定性分析确定了包含不同类别的四个自我管理领域:(1)管理医疗方案,(2)管理传记工作,(3)管理(新的)生活角色,以及(4)一般自我管理技能。概念模型说明了它们之间的相互联系,其中最常涉及的是医疗方案管理的各个方面。结论:实体器官移植后的自我管理是复杂的,涉及医疗、情感、社会和行为方面。研究文献主要集中在治疗方案管理方面,其他方面有待进一步探索。未来的研究应解决差距,以支持整体的,以患者为中心的移植后护理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Aspects of Self-Management After Solid Organ Transplantation-A Scoping Review.

Aspects of Self-Management After Solid Organ Transplantation-A Scoping Review.

Aspects of Self-Management After Solid Organ Transplantation-A Scoping Review.

Aspects of Self-Management After Solid Organ Transplantation-A Scoping Review.

Background: Solid organ transplantation improves survival and quality of life but requires lifelong self-management. While models exist for kidney and liver recipients, a comprehensive framework for all solid organ transplant recipients is lacking. Addressing this gap is essential for optimizing post-transplant care. Objectives: This report aims to conceptualize self-management after solid organ transplantation by addressing questions related to (1) the contexts studied to date, (2) research methodologies and publication types used, and (3) core aspects associated with self-management post-transplantation. Methods: A scoping review was used to address the above objectives. A comprehensive search strategy identified relevant studies, followed by systematic screening, data extraction, and qualitative content analysis. Findings were categorized using a deductive-inductive coding approach to map core self-management aspects after solid organ transplantation. Results: The search yielded 34,417 records, with 742 ultimately included. Publications from 43 countries spanned 43 years, with many (48.9%) published after 2016. Research articles dominated (80.1%), covering kidney (61%), liver (22%), heart (21%), and lung (16%) transplants. A qualitative analysis identified four self-management domains containing various categories: (1) Managing the medical-therapeutic regimen, (2) managing biographical work, (3) managing (new) life roles, and (4) generic self-management skills. The conceptual model illustrates their interconnections, with aspects of the medical-therapeutic regimen management most frequently covered. Conclusions: Self-management after solid organ transplantation is complex, involving medical-therapeutic, emotional, social, and behavioral aspects. Aspects of managing the medical-therapeutic regimen dominate the research literature, while other aspects need further exploration. Future studies should address gaps to support holistic, patient-centered post-transplant care strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Reports
Nursing Reports NURSING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Nursing Reports is an open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives. The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses. Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility. Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信