Candelas López-López, Gemma Robleda-Font, María Del Mar Sánchez-Sánchez, Carmen María Sarabia-Cobo, Ignacio Latorre-Marco, Montserrat Solís-Muñoz, Teresa Pérez-Pérez, Cristina Martín-Arriscado Arroba, Caroline Schnakers, Juan Roldan-Merino
{"title":"插管患者伤害感觉昏迷量表(NCS-R-I)西班牙语翻译的可靠性和有效性研究","authors":"Candelas López-López, Gemma Robleda-Font, María Del Mar Sánchez-Sánchez, Carmen María Sarabia-Cobo, Ignacio Latorre-Marco, Montserrat Solís-Muñoz, Teresa Pérez-Pérez, Cristina Martín-Arriscado Arroba, Caroline Schnakers, Juan Roldan-Merino","doi":"10.3390/nursrep15080278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Pain assessment scales provide a clear clinical benefit in patients who are unable to self-report. The Nociception Coma Scale-Revised-adapted for Intubated patients (NCS-R-I) was developed to assess pain in patients with acquired brain injury who are unable to self-report. However, this instrument has not yet been translated and validated for use in Spain. The objective was to translate the Nociception Coma Scale-Revised-adapted for Intubated patients (NCS-R-I) into Spanish and to assess the reliability and validity of the Spanish version in patients with brain injury. <b>Methods</b>: This study was carried out in two phases. First, the scale was translated into Spanish. Next, a psychometric analysis was performed to determine the reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the NCS-R-I in 207 critically ill patients with acquired brain injury and disorders of consciousness. Two blinded observers administered the scale at three time points: 5 min before, during, and 15 min after a series of nociceptive and non-nociceptive procedures. <b>Results</b>: The internal consistency of the NCS-R-I was acceptable (ordinal alpha = 0.60-0.90). Interobserver agreement was good (kappa = 0.80; intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.90). In terms of discriminant validity, the AUC was 0.952 (95% CI: 0.931-0.973). NCS-R-I scores increased significantly during performance of nociceptive procedures compared to scores obtained before and after these procedures, confirming the scale's sensitivity to change. Similarly, during the performance of nociceptive procedures, scores on the NCS-R-I were significantly higher (<i>p</i> < 0.001) than those observed during non-nociceptive procedures. <b>Conclusions</b>: The results of this study demonstrate that the NCS-R-I is a valid, reliable tool for the assessment of pain in patients with acquired brain injury who are unable to self-report.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"15 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12389189/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability and Validation Study of the Spanish Translation of the Nociception Coma Scale-Revised-Adapted for Intubated Patients (NCS-R-I).\",\"authors\":\"Candelas López-López, Gemma Robleda-Font, María Del Mar Sánchez-Sánchez, Carmen María Sarabia-Cobo, Ignacio Latorre-Marco, Montserrat Solís-Muñoz, Teresa Pérez-Pérez, Cristina Martín-Arriscado Arroba, Caroline Schnakers, Juan Roldan-Merino\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/nursrep15080278\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Pain assessment scales provide a clear clinical benefit in patients who are unable to self-report. The Nociception Coma Scale-Revised-adapted for Intubated patients (NCS-R-I) was developed to assess pain in patients with acquired brain injury who are unable to self-report. However, this instrument has not yet been translated and validated for use in Spain. The objective was to translate the Nociception Coma Scale-Revised-adapted for Intubated patients (NCS-R-I) into Spanish and to assess the reliability and validity of the Spanish version in patients with brain injury. <b>Methods</b>: This study was carried out in two phases. First, the scale was translated into Spanish. Next, a psychometric analysis was performed to determine the reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the NCS-R-I in 207 critically ill patients with acquired brain injury and disorders of consciousness. Two blinded observers administered the scale at three time points: 5 min before, during, and 15 min after a series of nociceptive and non-nociceptive procedures. <b>Results</b>: The internal consistency of the NCS-R-I was acceptable (ordinal alpha = 0.60-0.90). Interobserver agreement was good (kappa = 0.80; intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.90). In terms of discriminant validity, the AUC was 0.952 (95% CI: 0.931-0.973). NCS-R-I scores increased significantly during performance of nociceptive procedures compared to scores obtained before and after these procedures, confirming the scale's sensitivity to change. Similarly, during the performance of nociceptive procedures, scores on the NCS-R-I were significantly higher (<i>p</i> < 0.001) than those observed during non-nociceptive procedures. <b>Conclusions</b>: The results of this study demonstrate that the NCS-R-I is a valid, reliable tool for the assessment of pain in patients with acquired brain injury who are unable to self-report.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12389189/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15080278\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15080278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reliability and Validation Study of the Spanish Translation of the Nociception Coma Scale-Revised-Adapted for Intubated Patients (NCS-R-I).
Background/Objectives: Pain assessment scales provide a clear clinical benefit in patients who are unable to self-report. The Nociception Coma Scale-Revised-adapted for Intubated patients (NCS-R-I) was developed to assess pain in patients with acquired brain injury who are unable to self-report. However, this instrument has not yet been translated and validated for use in Spain. The objective was to translate the Nociception Coma Scale-Revised-adapted for Intubated patients (NCS-R-I) into Spanish and to assess the reliability and validity of the Spanish version in patients with brain injury. Methods: This study was carried out in two phases. First, the scale was translated into Spanish. Next, a psychometric analysis was performed to determine the reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the NCS-R-I in 207 critically ill patients with acquired brain injury and disorders of consciousness. Two blinded observers administered the scale at three time points: 5 min before, during, and 15 min after a series of nociceptive and non-nociceptive procedures. Results: The internal consistency of the NCS-R-I was acceptable (ordinal alpha = 0.60-0.90). Interobserver agreement was good (kappa = 0.80; intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.90). In terms of discriminant validity, the AUC was 0.952 (95% CI: 0.931-0.973). NCS-R-I scores increased significantly during performance of nociceptive procedures compared to scores obtained before and after these procedures, confirming the scale's sensitivity to change. Similarly, during the performance of nociceptive procedures, scores on the NCS-R-I were significantly higher (p < 0.001) than those observed during non-nociceptive procedures. Conclusions: The results of this study demonstrate that the NCS-R-I is a valid, reliable tool for the assessment of pain in patients with acquired brain injury who are unable to self-report.
期刊介绍:
Nursing Reports is an open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives. The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses. Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility. Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.