摘要:医学生团队沟通技巧领导力课程。

Q4 Medicine
Claire Foerster
{"title":"摘要:医学生团队沟通技巧领导力课程。","authors":"Claire Foerster","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Healthcare has shifted toward team-based patient care to address the increasing complexities of patient care as studies have demonstrated that a team-based approach results in better outcomes and safer patient care. Medical students are future leaders of healthcare teams yet current medical school curricula does not include a leadership or team-based teaching component. The goal of this project was to design a pilot program to teach the fundamentals of leadership and communication skills as relevant to medical students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To assess the aptitude and educational need of the target audience, a medical school-wide student survey was distributed to all the medical students. Course curriculum was subsequently developed to include an online didactic component and an in-person simulation component. The didactic activity taught fundamentals of communication, active listening, giving and receiving feedback. Participant knowledge was assessed upon completion of the didactic course (pre-activity) and after completion of the simulation component (post-activity) using a 10-question quiz. Participants were divided into groups, given specific scenarios and roles that explored these themes. Students were primarily in their pre-clinical years however, each group had one student who was completing clinical clerkships. Participants rotated through the three scenarios and had an opportunity to complete each role within their group. At the end of the session, feedback was given and participants completed a final survey and post-quiz. A paired t-test was used to analyze the participants' answers on each of these questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey was deployed to all 280 medical students and 78 responses were obtained which demonstrated an interest in a leadership development course. Initial interest exceeded capacity. A total of 14 students completed the pilot course in its entirety, including the post-activity survey. Participant knowledge before and after the course was analyzed using a t-test which evaluated knowledge of the 4-part communication model, active listening skills, and fundaments of giving and receiving feedback. Each question in the 10-question survey was analyzed using a t-test with each question having its own p-value. There were no statistically significant differences between the results of the pre-activity quiz and the post-activity quiz.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Student interest in this course exceeded the expectations of the author, which strengthens the assertion that medical students would benefit from formal communication and leadership training as future leaders of the healthcare team. There was no statistically significant difference between the results of the pre-activity quiz and the post-activity quiz. This was likely due to several factors including small sample size, and the fact that the pre-activity quiz took place after completion of the didactic course. In the future, the pre-activity quiz should take place prior to the didactic course to better assess competencies. Verbal feedback of the course during the debrief session was largely positive. The next phase of this pilot course should focus on expanding the number of medical student participants and creating a diversity of simulation scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":39219,"journal":{"name":"South Dakota medicine : the journal of the South Dakota State Medical Association","volume":"78 9","pages":"406"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"2025 Scholars' Research Symposium Abstract: Leadership Course in Team-Based Communication Skills for Medical Students.\",\"authors\":\"Claire Foerster\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Healthcare has shifted toward team-based patient care to address the increasing complexities of patient care as studies have demonstrated that a team-based approach results in better outcomes and safer patient care. Medical students are future leaders of healthcare teams yet current medical school curricula does not include a leadership or team-based teaching component. The goal of this project was to design a pilot program to teach the fundamentals of leadership and communication skills as relevant to medical students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To assess the aptitude and educational need of the target audience, a medical school-wide student survey was distributed to all the medical students. Course curriculum was subsequently developed to include an online didactic component and an in-person simulation component. The didactic activity taught fundamentals of communication, active listening, giving and receiving feedback. Participant knowledge was assessed upon completion of the didactic course (pre-activity) and after completion of the simulation component (post-activity) using a 10-question quiz. Participants were divided into groups, given specific scenarios and roles that explored these themes. Students were primarily in their pre-clinical years however, each group had one student who was completing clinical clerkships. Participants rotated through the three scenarios and had an opportunity to complete each role within their group. At the end of the session, feedback was given and participants completed a final survey and post-quiz. A paired t-test was used to analyze the participants' answers on each of these questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey was deployed to all 280 medical students and 78 responses were obtained which demonstrated an interest in a leadership development course. Initial interest exceeded capacity. A total of 14 students completed the pilot course in its entirety, including the post-activity survey. Participant knowledge before and after the course was analyzed using a t-test which evaluated knowledge of the 4-part communication model, active listening skills, and fundaments of giving and receiving feedback. Each question in the 10-question survey was analyzed using a t-test with each question having its own p-value. There were no statistically significant differences between the results of the pre-activity quiz and the post-activity quiz.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Student interest in this course exceeded the expectations of the author, which strengthens the assertion that medical students would benefit from formal communication and leadership training as future leaders of the healthcare team. There was no statistically significant difference between the results of the pre-activity quiz and the post-activity quiz. This was likely due to several factors including small sample size, and the fact that the pre-activity quiz took place after completion of the didactic course. In the future, the pre-activity quiz should take place prior to the didactic course to better assess competencies. Verbal feedback of the course during the debrief session was largely positive. The next phase of this pilot course should focus on expanding the number of medical student participants and creating a diversity of simulation scenarios.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39219,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South Dakota medicine : the journal of the South Dakota State Medical Association\",\"volume\":\"78 9\",\"pages\":\"406\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South Dakota medicine : the journal of the South Dakota State Medical Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Dakota medicine : the journal of the South Dakota State Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:医疗保健已经转向以团队为基础的患者护理,以解决患者护理日益复杂的问题,因为研究表明,以团队为基础的方法可以带来更好的结果和更安全的患者护理。医学生是医疗团队的未来领导者,但目前的医学院课程不包括领导或团队教学的组成部分。该项目的目标是设计一个试点方案,教授与医学生相关的领导能力和沟通技巧的基础知识。方法:对所有医学院学生进行问卷调查,评估目标受众的能力倾向和教育需求。课程课程随后发展为包括在线教学部分和现场模拟部分。教学活动教授沟通、积极倾听、给予和接受反馈的基础知识。在完成教学课程(活动前)和完成模拟组件(活动后)后,使用10个问题的测验对参与者的知识进行评估。参与者被分成不同的小组,给定特定的场景和角色来探索这些主题。学生主要是在他们的临床前几年,然而,每组有一个学生谁是完成临床见习。参与者在三个场景中轮换,并有机会完成他们小组中的每个角色。在会议结束时,给出反馈,参与者完成最后的调查和后测验。配对t检验用于分析参与者对每个问题的回答。结果:对280名医学生进行了问卷调查,获得78份对领导力发展课程感兴趣的反馈。最初的兴趣超出了容量。共有14名学生完整完成了试点课程,包括活动后调查。使用t检验来分析课程前后参与者的知识,评估四部分沟通模型的知识,积极倾听技巧,以及给予和接受反馈的基础。10个问题调查中的每个问题都使用t检验进行分析,每个问题都有自己的p值。活动前测验和活动后测验的结果没有统计学上的显著差异。结论:学生对这门课程的兴趣超出了作者的预期,这加强了医学生作为医疗团队未来领导者将受益于正式沟通和领导力培训的主张。活动前测验和活动后测验的结果无统计学差异。这可能是由于几个因素造成的,包括样本量小,以及活动前测验是在教学课程结束后进行的。在未来,活动前测验应该在教学课程之前进行,以更好地评估能力。在汇报过程中,对课程的口头反馈基本上是积极的。这一试点课程的下一阶段应侧重于扩大医学院学生的参与人数,并创造多样化的模拟情景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
2025 Scholars' Research Symposium Abstract: Leadership Course in Team-Based Communication Skills for Medical Students.

Introduction: Healthcare has shifted toward team-based patient care to address the increasing complexities of patient care as studies have demonstrated that a team-based approach results in better outcomes and safer patient care. Medical students are future leaders of healthcare teams yet current medical school curricula does not include a leadership or team-based teaching component. The goal of this project was to design a pilot program to teach the fundamentals of leadership and communication skills as relevant to medical students.

Methods: To assess the aptitude and educational need of the target audience, a medical school-wide student survey was distributed to all the medical students. Course curriculum was subsequently developed to include an online didactic component and an in-person simulation component. The didactic activity taught fundamentals of communication, active listening, giving and receiving feedback. Participant knowledge was assessed upon completion of the didactic course (pre-activity) and after completion of the simulation component (post-activity) using a 10-question quiz. Participants were divided into groups, given specific scenarios and roles that explored these themes. Students were primarily in their pre-clinical years however, each group had one student who was completing clinical clerkships. Participants rotated through the three scenarios and had an opportunity to complete each role within their group. At the end of the session, feedback was given and participants completed a final survey and post-quiz. A paired t-test was used to analyze the participants' answers on each of these questions.

Results: The survey was deployed to all 280 medical students and 78 responses were obtained which demonstrated an interest in a leadership development course. Initial interest exceeded capacity. A total of 14 students completed the pilot course in its entirety, including the post-activity survey. Participant knowledge before and after the course was analyzed using a t-test which evaluated knowledge of the 4-part communication model, active listening skills, and fundaments of giving and receiving feedback. Each question in the 10-question survey was analyzed using a t-test with each question having its own p-value. There were no statistically significant differences between the results of the pre-activity quiz and the post-activity quiz.

Conclusion: Student interest in this course exceeded the expectations of the author, which strengthens the assertion that medical students would benefit from formal communication and leadership training as future leaders of the healthcare team. There was no statistically significant difference between the results of the pre-activity quiz and the post-activity quiz. This was likely due to several factors including small sample size, and the fact that the pre-activity quiz took place after completion of the didactic course. In the future, the pre-activity quiz should take place prior to the didactic course to better assess competencies. Verbal feedback of the course during the debrief session was largely positive. The next phase of this pilot course should focus on expanding the number of medical student participants and creating a diversity of simulation scenarios.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信