垂直技术与相关价值:对采掘主义时代技术伦理的再思考。

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Philosophy and Technology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-30 DOI:10.1007/s13347-025-00962-w
Jeroen Hopster
{"title":"垂直技术与相关价值:对采掘主义时代技术伦理的再思考。","authors":"Jeroen Hopster","doi":"10.1007/s13347-025-00962-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Critical reflection on the material, environmental, and social conditions underlying technology remains peripheral to the field of technology ethics. In this commentary, I underwrite the diagnosis by Vandemeulebroucke et al. (2025) that the field suffers from an \"extractivist blindspot\", but propose a somewhat different cure. First, rather than focusing on the material ontogenesis of technical artefacts, a more radical turn away from artefacts is called for, towards layered socio-technical systems as the field's core object of analysis. Second, notwithstanding the merits of their intercultural proposal, I argue that in overcoming extractivism the conceptual resources of more adjacent philosophical traditions should not be overlooked.</p>","PeriodicalId":39065,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy and Technology","volume":"38 3","pages":"124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12398441/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vertical Technologies and Relational Values: Rethinking Ethics of Technology in an Age of Extractivism.\",\"authors\":\"Jeroen Hopster\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13347-025-00962-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Critical reflection on the material, environmental, and social conditions underlying technology remains peripheral to the field of technology ethics. In this commentary, I underwrite the diagnosis by Vandemeulebroucke et al. (2025) that the field suffers from an \\\"extractivist blindspot\\\", but propose a somewhat different cure. First, rather than focusing on the material ontogenesis of technical artefacts, a more radical turn away from artefacts is called for, towards layered socio-technical systems as the field's core object of analysis. Second, notwithstanding the merits of their intercultural proposal, I argue that in overcoming extractivism the conceptual resources of more adjacent philosophical traditions should not be overlooked.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophy and Technology\",\"volume\":\"38 3\",\"pages\":\"124\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12398441/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophy and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-025-00962-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-025-00962-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对技术背后的物质、环境和社会条件的批判性反思仍然是技术伦理领域的外围问题。在这篇评论中,我赞同Vandemeulebroucke等人(2025)的诊断,即该领域存在“采掘者盲点”,但提出了一种不同的治疗方法。首先,与其关注技术人工制品的物质本体,还不如更激进地转向人工制品,将分层的社会技术系统作为该领域的核心分析对象。其次,尽管他们的跨文化建议有其优点,但我认为,在克服提取主义时,不应忽视更邻近的哲学传统的概念资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Vertical Technologies and Relational Values: Rethinking Ethics of Technology in an Age of Extractivism.

Critical reflection on the material, environmental, and social conditions underlying technology remains peripheral to the field of technology ethics. In this commentary, I underwrite the diagnosis by Vandemeulebroucke et al. (2025) that the field suffers from an "extractivist blindspot", but propose a somewhat different cure. First, rather than focusing on the material ontogenesis of technical artefacts, a more radical turn away from artefacts is called for, towards layered socio-technical systems as the field's core object of analysis. Second, notwithstanding the merits of their intercultural proposal, I argue that in overcoming extractivism the conceptual resources of more adjacent philosophical traditions should not be overlooked.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Philosophy and Technology
Philosophy and Technology Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
98
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信