Bettie Coplan, Anthony Miller, Tamara Ritsema, Kirsten Bonnin, Morgan Luck, Jane McDaniel, Curt Bay, Angela Kiselyk, Jonathan Kilstrom, Michelle DiBaise
{"title":"取消研究生入学考试和医师助理/助理学生多样性。","authors":"Bettie Coplan, Anthony Miller, Tamara Ritsema, Kirsten Bonnin, Morgan Luck, Jane McDaniel, Curt Bay, Angela Kiselyk, Jonathan Kilstrom, Michelle DiBaise","doi":"10.1097/JPA.0000000000000700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study examined demographic characteristics among physician assistant/associate (PA) program applicants who were offered admission and among matriculants at 5 PA programs that eliminated the Graduate Record Examination (GRE) admissions requirement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Collated admissions data for 4 cycles were categorized into 2 periods, one representing 2 cycles before GRE removal (GRE period) and one representing 2 cycles after GRE removal (no-GRE period). Chi-square analyses were used to compare percentages of applicants offered admission and percentages of matriculants who were from backgrounds underrepresented in medicine (URiM), were first-generation college students, and who reported economic disadvantage (ED) across the 2 periods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individual program outcomes varied. Some experienced statistically significant increases in various measures; others experienced increases or decreases that were insignificant. Collectively, compared with the GRE period, the proportion of applicants offered admission during the no-GRE period who were URiM was 6.2% higher (P = .002, 95% confidence interval [CI] [2.3%, 10.1]); the proportion who were first-generation was 11.2% higher (P < .001, 95% CI [7.3%, 15.0%]); and the proportion with ED was 9.4% higher (P < 0.001, 95% CI [5.8%, 13.0%]). Among matriculants, the proportion who were URiM was 8.7% higher (P = 0.001, 95% CI [3.7%, 13.6%]), the proportion who were first-generation was 8.6% higher (P = 0.001, 95% CI [3.8%, 13.5%]); and the proportion with ED was 8.8% higher (P < 0.001, 95% CI [4.2%, 13.3%]).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Study results suggest that for some PA programs, eliminating the GRE admissions requirement may positively contribute to various approaches to admitting more students from diverse backgrounds.</p>","PeriodicalId":39231,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physician Assistant Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Graduate Record Examination Removal From Admissions and Physician Assistant/Associate Student Diversity.\",\"authors\":\"Bettie Coplan, Anthony Miller, Tamara Ritsema, Kirsten Bonnin, Morgan Luck, Jane McDaniel, Curt Bay, Angela Kiselyk, Jonathan Kilstrom, Michelle DiBaise\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JPA.0000000000000700\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study examined demographic characteristics among physician assistant/associate (PA) program applicants who were offered admission and among matriculants at 5 PA programs that eliminated the Graduate Record Examination (GRE) admissions requirement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Collated admissions data for 4 cycles were categorized into 2 periods, one representing 2 cycles before GRE removal (GRE period) and one representing 2 cycles after GRE removal (no-GRE period). Chi-square analyses were used to compare percentages of applicants offered admission and percentages of matriculants who were from backgrounds underrepresented in medicine (URiM), were first-generation college students, and who reported economic disadvantage (ED) across the 2 periods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individual program outcomes varied. Some experienced statistically significant increases in various measures; others experienced increases or decreases that were insignificant. Collectively, compared with the GRE period, the proportion of applicants offered admission during the no-GRE period who were URiM was 6.2% higher (P = .002, 95% confidence interval [CI] [2.3%, 10.1]); the proportion who were first-generation was 11.2% higher (P < .001, 95% CI [7.3%, 15.0%]); and the proportion with ED was 9.4% higher (P < 0.001, 95% CI [5.8%, 13.0%]). Among matriculants, the proportion who were URiM was 8.7% higher (P = 0.001, 95% CI [3.7%, 13.6%]), the proportion who were first-generation was 8.6% higher (P = 0.001, 95% CI [3.8%, 13.5%]); and the proportion with ED was 8.8% higher (P < 0.001, 95% CI [4.2%, 13.3%]).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Study results suggest that for some PA programs, eliminating the GRE admissions requirement may positively contribute to various approaches to admitting more students from diverse backgrounds.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Physician Assistant Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Physician Assistant Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPA.0000000000000700\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physician Assistant Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPA.0000000000000700","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
Graduate Record Examination Removal From Admissions and Physician Assistant/Associate Student Diversity.
Introduction: This study examined demographic characteristics among physician assistant/associate (PA) program applicants who were offered admission and among matriculants at 5 PA programs that eliminated the Graduate Record Examination (GRE) admissions requirement.
Methods: Collated admissions data for 4 cycles were categorized into 2 periods, one representing 2 cycles before GRE removal (GRE period) and one representing 2 cycles after GRE removal (no-GRE period). Chi-square analyses were used to compare percentages of applicants offered admission and percentages of matriculants who were from backgrounds underrepresented in medicine (URiM), were first-generation college students, and who reported economic disadvantage (ED) across the 2 periods.
Results: Individual program outcomes varied. Some experienced statistically significant increases in various measures; others experienced increases or decreases that were insignificant. Collectively, compared with the GRE period, the proportion of applicants offered admission during the no-GRE period who were URiM was 6.2% higher (P = .002, 95% confidence interval [CI] [2.3%, 10.1]); the proportion who were first-generation was 11.2% higher (P < .001, 95% CI [7.3%, 15.0%]); and the proportion with ED was 9.4% higher (P < 0.001, 95% CI [5.8%, 13.0%]). Among matriculants, the proportion who were URiM was 8.7% higher (P = 0.001, 95% CI [3.7%, 13.6%]), the proportion who were first-generation was 8.6% higher (P = 0.001, 95% CI [3.8%, 13.5%]); and the proportion with ED was 8.8% higher (P < 0.001, 95% CI [4.2%, 13.3%]).
Discussion: Study results suggest that for some PA programs, eliminating the GRE admissions requirement may positively contribute to various approaches to admitting more students from diverse backgrounds.