{"title":"单核细胞分布宽度(MDW)作为脓毒症预测的一种有用且具有成本效益的生物标志物。","authors":"Dimitrios Theodoridis, Angeliki Tsifi, Emmanouil Magiorkinis, Riris Ioannis, Vatistas Ioannis, Evgenia Moustaferi, Kanakaris Christos, Tsiligianni Ekaterini, Anastasios Ioannidis, Efstathios Chronopoulos, Stylianos Chatzipanagiotou","doi":"10.33393/jcb.2025.3486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sepsis is a life-threatening condition and a major cause of hospital mortality worldwide. This study investigated the diagnostic utility of monocyte mean volume (MONO MEAN-V), monocyte distribution width (MDW), monocyte mean conductivity (MONO MEAN-C), and monocyte standard deviation conductivity (MONO Sd-C) for sepsis, compared to conventional markers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort study was conducted in two centers, enrolling adult patients classified into three groups: sepsis, septic shock, and febrile. Blood was drawn from septic patients on days 1, 3, and 5 of admission. MDW and other inflammatory parameters were measured in all patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with sepsis or septic shock exhibited significantly elevated MONO MEAN-V, MDW, and MONO MEAN-C and lower MONO Sd-C compared to febrile patients. Among the biomarkers evaluated, MDW emerged as a reliable predictor of sepsis. A cut-off MDW value of 25.1 on day 1 demonstrated optimal diagnostic performance, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.77-0.91), sensitivity of 75%, and specificity of 91.2%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MDW appears to be a cost-effective, rapid marker for sepsis detection, performing at least as effectively as existing biomarkers. Our findings corroborate other published studies, highlighting MDW's potential to enhance early sepsis recognition.</p>","PeriodicalId":37524,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Circulating Biomarkers","volume":"14 ","pages":"21-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12371540/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monocyte Distribution Width (MDW) as a useful and cost-effective biomarker for sepsis prediction.\",\"authors\":\"Dimitrios Theodoridis, Angeliki Tsifi, Emmanouil Magiorkinis, Riris Ioannis, Vatistas Ioannis, Evgenia Moustaferi, Kanakaris Christos, Tsiligianni Ekaterini, Anastasios Ioannidis, Efstathios Chronopoulos, Stylianos Chatzipanagiotou\",\"doi\":\"10.33393/jcb.2025.3486\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sepsis is a life-threatening condition and a major cause of hospital mortality worldwide. This study investigated the diagnostic utility of monocyte mean volume (MONO MEAN-V), monocyte distribution width (MDW), monocyte mean conductivity (MONO MEAN-C), and monocyte standard deviation conductivity (MONO Sd-C) for sepsis, compared to conventional markers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort study was conducted in two centers, enrolling adult patients classified into three groups: sepsis, septic shock, and febrile. Blood was drawn from septic patients on days 1, 3, and 5 of admission. MDW and other inflammatory parameters were measured in all patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with sepsis or septic shock exhibited significantly elevated MONO MEAN-V, MDW, and MONO MEAN-C and lower MONO Sd-C compared to febrile patients. Among the biomarkers evaluated, MDW emerged as a reliable predictor of sepsis. A cut-off MDW value of 25.1 on day 1 demonstrated optimal diagnostic performance, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.77-0.91), sensitivity of 75%, and specificity of 91.2%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MDW appears to be a cost-effective, rapid marker for sepsis detection, performing at least as effectively as existing biomarkers. Our findings corroborate other published studies, highlighting MDW's potential to enhance early sepsis recognition.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37524,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Circulating Biomarkers\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"21-29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12371540/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Circulating Biomarkers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33393/jcb.2025.3486\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Circulating Biomarkers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33393/jcb.2025.3486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:脓毒症是一种危及生命的疾病,也是世界范围内医院死亡的主要原因。本研究探讨了单核细胞平均体积(MONO mean - v)、单核细胞分布宽度(MDW)、单核细胞平均电导率(MONO mean - c)和单核细胞标准偏差电导率(MONO Sd-C)对败血症的诊断价值,并与传统标志物进行了比较。方法:在两个中心进行前瞻性队列研究,将成年患者分为三组:败血症、感染性休克和发热。脓毒症患者于入院第1、3、5天抽血。所有患者均测量MDW及其他炎症参数。结果:与发热患者相比,脓毒症或感染性休克患者表现出明显升高的MONO MEAN-V、MDW和MONO MEAN-C,以及较低的MONO Sd-C。在评估的生物标志物中,MDW成为脓毒症的可靠预测指标。第1天的MDW截值为25.1,ROC曲线下面积为0.84 (95% CI: 0.77-0.91),敏感性为75%,特异性为91.2%。结论:MDW似乎是一种具有成本效益的、快速的败血症检测标志物,至少与现有的生物标志物一样有效。我们的发现证实了其他已发表的研究,强调了MDW增强早期败血症识别的潜力。
Monocyte Distribution Width (MDW) as a useful and cost-effective biomarker for sepsis prediction.
Background: Sepsis is a life-threatening condition and a major cause of hospital mortality worldwide. This study investigated the diagnostic utility of monocyte mean volume (MONO MEAN-V), monocyte distribution width (MDW), monocyte mean conductivity (MONO MEAN-C), and monocyte standard deviation conductivity (MONO Sd-C) for sepsis, compared to conventional markers.
Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted in two centers, enrolling adult patients classified into three groups: sepsis, septic shock, and febrile. Blood was drawn from septic patients on days 1, 3, and 5 of admission. MDW and other inflammatory parameters were measured in all patients.
Results: Patients with sepsis or septic shock exhibited significantly elevated MONO MEAN-V, MDW, and MONO MEAN-C and lower MONO Sd-C compared to febrile patients. Among the biomarkers evaluated, MDW emerged as a reliable predictor of sepsis. A cut-off MDW value of 25.1 on day 1 demonstrated optimal diagnostic performance, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.77-0.91), sensitivity of 75%, and specificity of 91.2%.
Conclusions: MDW appears to be a cost-effective, rapid marker for sepsis detection, performing at least as effectively as existing biomarkers. Our findings corroborate other published studies, highlighting MDW's potential to enhance early sepsis recognition.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Circulating Biomarkers is an international, peer-reviewed, open access scientific journal focusing on all aspects of the rapidly growing field of circulating blood-based biomarkers and diagnostics using circulating protein and lipid markers, circulating tumor cells (CTC), circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and extracellular vesicles, including exosomes, microvesicles, microparticles, ectosomes and apoptotic bodies. The journal publishes high-impact articles that deal with all fields related to circulating biomarkers and diagnostics, ranging from basic science to translational and clinical applications. Papers from a wide variety of disciplines are welcome; interdisciplinary studies are especially suitable for this journal. Included within the scope are a broad array of specialties including (but not limited to) cancer, immunology, neurology, metabolic diseases, cardiovascular medicine, regenerative medicine, nosology, physiology, pathology, technological applications in diagnostics, therapeutics, vaccine, drug delivery, regenerative medicine, drug development and clinical trials. The journal also hosts reviews, perspectives and news on specific topics.