边缘型人格障碍患者的古生物学思维观察。

Q4 Psychology
Mark L Ruffalo
{"title":"边缘型人格障碍患者的古生物学思维观察。","authors":"Mark L Ruffalo","doi":"10.1521/pdps.2025.53.3.294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Paleologic thinking, a prelogical mode of reasoning described by Silvano Arieti, is characterized by emotion-driven, retrospective reasoning and has been observed in severe mental illnesses such as schizophrenia. The author explores its relevance to borderline personality disorder, an area that has been historically understudied. Patients with borderline personality disorder often regress into paleologic modes of thought during interpersonal distress, resulting in illogical conclusions driven by feelings rather than evidence. It is argued that this process underlies symptoms of paranoia, misperceptions of rejection, and interpersonal dysfunction. Historical perspectives linking borderline personality disorder and schizophrenia, as well as empirical findings from unstructured psychological tests, highlight overlaps in thought disorders between the two conditions. Clinical implications suggest that addressing paleologic thinking can improve treatment outcomes. Structured psychotherapies, such as transference-focused psychotherapy and dialectical behavior therapy, offer pathways to target and mitigate the impact of this pathological reasoning process in patients with borderline personality disorder.</p>","PeriodicalId":38518,"journal":{"name":"Psychodynamic Psychiatry","volume":"53 3","pages":"294-300"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Some Observations on Paleologic Thinking in Borderline Personality Disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Mark L Ruffalo\",\"doi\":\"10.1521/pdps.2025.53.3.294\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Paleologic thinking, a prelogical mode of reasoning described by Silvano Arieti, is characterized by emotion-driven, retrospective reasoning and has been observed in severe mental illnesses such as schizophrenia. The author explores its relevance to borderline personality disorder, an area that has been historically understudied. Patients with borderline personality disorder often regress into paleologic modes of thought during interpersonal distress, resulting in illogical conclusions driven by feelings rather than evidence. It is argued that this process underlies symptoms of paranoia, misperceptions of rejection, and interpersonal dysfunction. Historical perspectives linking borderline personality disorder and schizophrenia, as well as empirical findings from unstructured psychological tests, highlight overlaps in thought disorders between the two conditions. Clinical implications suggest that addressing paleologic thinking can improve treatment outcomes. Structured psychotherapies, such as transference-focused psychotherapy and dialectical behavior therapy, offer pathways to target and mitigate the impact of this pathological reasoning process in patients with borderline personality disorder.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychodynamic Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"53 3\",\"pages\":\"294-300\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychodynamic Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1521/pdps.2025.53.3.294\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychodynamic Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1521/pdps.2025.53.3.294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

古生物学思维是一种由Silvano Arieti描述的前逻辑推理模式,其特点是情感驱动、回顾性推理,在精神分裂症等严重精神疾病中也有发现。作者探讨了它与边缘性人格障碍的相关性,这是一个历史上研究不足的领域。患有边缘型人格障碍的患者在人际关系困扰时往往会退回到古生物学的思维模式,导致在感情而非证据的驱使下得出不合逻辑的结论。有人认为,这一过程是偏执狂、对拒绝的误解和人际功能障碍症状的基础。将边缘型人格障碍和精神分裂症联系起来的历史观点,以及来自非结构化心理测试的实证结果,都强调了这两种疾病在思维障碍方面的重叠。临床意义表明,解决古生物学思维可以改善治疗效果。以移情为中心的心理治疗和辩证行为治疗等结构化心理治疗为边缘型人格障碍患者提供了针对和减轻这种病理推理过程影响的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Some Observations on Paleologic Thinking in Borderline Personality Disorder.

Paleologic thinking, a prelogical mode of reasoning described by Silvano Arieti, is characterized by emotion-driven, retrospective reasoning and has been observed in severe mental illnesses such as schizophrenia. The author explores its relevance to borderline personality disorder, an area that has been historically understudied. Patients with borderline personality disorder often regress into paleologic modes of thought during interpersonal distress, resulting in illogical conclusions driven by feelings rather than evidence. It is argued that this process underlies symptoms of paranoia, misperceptions of rejection, and interpersonal dysfunction. Historical perspectives linking borderline personality disorder and schizophrenia, as well as empirical findings from unstructured psychological tests, highlight overlaps in thought disorders between the two conditions. Clinical implications suggest that addressing paleologic thinking can improve treatment outcomes. Structured psychotherapies, such as transference-focused psychotherapy and dialectical behavior therapy, offer pathways to target and mitigate the impact of this pathological reasoning process in patients with borderline personality disorder.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychodynamic Psychiatry
Psychodynamic Psychiatry Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信