日常同步视觉中心近多焦隐形眼镜的对比敏感度比较:一项初步研究。

IF 1.8 Q2 Medicine
David P Piñero, Ainhoa Molina-Martín, Elena Martínez-Plaza, Kevin J Mena-Guevara, Violeta Gómez-Vicente, Dolores de Fez
{"title":"日常同步视觉中心近多焦隐形眼镜的对比敏感度比较:一项初步研究。","authors":"David P Piñero, Ainhoa Molina-Martín, Elena Martínez-Plaza, Kevin J Mena-Guevara, Violeta Gómez-Vicente, Dolores de Fez","doi":"10.3390/vision9030067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our purpose is to evaluate the binocular contrast sensitivity function (CSF) in a presbyopic population and compare the results obtained with four different simultaneous-vision center-near multifocal contact lens (MCL) designs for distance vision under two illumination conditions. Additionally, chromatic CSF (red-green and blue-yellow) was evaluated. A randomized crossover pilot study was conducted. Four daily disposable lens designs, based on simultaneous-vision and center-near correction, were compared. The achromatic contrast sensitivity function (CSF) was measured binocularly using the CSV1000e test under two lighting conditions: room light on and off. Chromatic CSF was measured using the OptoPad-CSF test. Comparison of achromatic results with room lighting showed a statistically significant difference only for 3 cpd (<i>p</i> = 0.03) between the baseline visit (with spectacles) and all MCLs. Comparison of achromatic results without room lighting showed no statistically significant differences between the baseline and all MCLs for any spatial frequency (<i>p</i> > 0.05 in all cases). Comparison of CSF-T results showed a statistically significant difference only for 4 cpd (<i>p</i> = 0.002). Comparison of CSF-D results showed no statistically significant difference for all frequencies (<i>p</i> > 0.05 in all cases). The MCL designs analyzed provided satisfactory achromatic contrast sensitivity results for distance vision, similar to those obtained with spectacles, with no remarkable differences between designs. Chromatic contrast sensitivity for the red-green and blue-yellow mechanisms revealed some differences from the baseline that should be further investigated in future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":36586,"journal":{"name":"Vision (Switzerland)","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12372024/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contrast Sensitivity Comparison of Daily Simultaneous-Vision Center-Near Multifocal Contact Lenses: A Pilot Study.\",\"authors\":\"David P Piñero, Ainhoa Molina-Martín, Elena Martínez-Plaza, Kevin J Mena-Guevara, Violeta Gómez-Vicente, Dolores de Fez\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/vision9030067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Our purpose is to evaluate the binocular contrast sensitivity function (CSF) in a presbyopic population and compare the results obtained with four different simultaneous-vision center-near multifocal contact lens (MCL) designs for distance vision under two illumination conditions. Additionally, chromatic CSF (red-green and blue-yellow) was evaluated. A randomized crossover pilot study was conducted. Four daily disposable lens designs, based on simultaneous-vision and center-near correction, were compared. The achromatic contrast sensitivity function (CSF) was measured binocularly using the CSV1000e test under two lighting conditions: room light on and off. Chromatic CSF was measured using the OptoPad-CSF test. Comparison of achromatic results with room lighting showed a statistically significant difference only for 3 cpd (<i>p</i> = 0.03) between the baseline visit (with spectacles) and all MCLs. Comparison of achromatic results without room lighting showed no statistically significant differences between the baseline and all MCLs for any spatial frequency (<i>p</i> > 0.05 in all cases). Comparison of CSF-T results showed a statistically significant difference only for 4 cpd (<i>p</i> = 0.002). Comparison of CSF-D results showed no statistically significant difference for all frequencies (<i>p</i> > 0.05 in all cases). The MCL designs analyzed provided satisfactory achromatic contrast sensitivity results for distance vision, similar to those obtained with spectacles, with no remarkable differences between designs. Chromatic contrast sensitivity for the red-green and blue-yellow mechanisms revealed some differences from the baseline that should be further investigated in future studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vision (Switzerland)\",\"volume\":\"9 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12372024/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vision (Switzerland)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/vision9030067\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vision (Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/vision9030067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的目的是评估老花眼人群的双眼对比敏感度函数(CSF),并比较在两种照明条件下,四种不同的同时视觉中心近多焦隐形眼镜(MCL)设计用于远距离视觉的结果。此外,染色CSF(红绿和蓝黄)进行评估。进行随机交叉先导研究。比较了四种基于同时视力和中心-近距离矫正的日用一次性镜片设计。使用CSV1000e测试在两种照明条件下(开灯和关灯)双目测量消色差对比灵敏度函数(CSF)。采用OptoPad-CSF检测染色脑脊液。室内照明的消色差结果的比较显示,基线访问(带眼镜)和所有mcl之间只有3 cpd (p = 0.03)具有统计学意义。无室内照明的消色差结果比较显示,基线与所有mcl在任何空间频率上的差异均无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。CSF-T结果比较显示,只有4个cpd有统计学差异(p = 0.002)。CSF-D结果比较,各频率间差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。所分析的MCL设计提供了令人满意的远视力消色差对比灵敏度结果,与戴眼镜获得的结果相似,设计之间没有显著差异。红绿和蓝黄机制的色彩对比敏感度显示了与基线的一些差异,应在未来的研究中进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Contrast Sensitivity Comparison of Daily Simultaneous-Vision Center-Near Multifocal Contact Lenses: A Pilot Study.

Contrast Sensitivity Comparison of Daily Simultaneous-Vision Center-Near Multifocal Contact Lenses: A Pilot Study.

Contrast Sensitivity Comparison of Daily Simultaneous-Vision Center-Near Multifocal Contact Lenses: A Pilot Study.

Our purpose is to evaluate the binocular contrast sensitivity function (CSF) in a presbyopic population and compare the results obtained with four different simultaneous-vision center-near multifocal contact lens (MCL) designs for distance vision under two illumination conditions. Additionally, chromatic CSF (red-green and blue-yellow) was evaluated. A randomized crossover pilot study was conducted. Four daily disposable lens designs, based on simultaneous-vision and center-near correction, were compared. The achromatic contrast sensitivity function (CSF) was measured binocularly using the CSV1000e test under two lighting conditions: room light on and off. Chromatic CSF was measured using the OptoPad-CSF test. Comparison of achromatic results with room lighting showed a statistically significant difference only for 3 cpd (p = 0.03) between the baseline visit (with spectacles) and all MCLs. Comparison of achromatic results without room lighting showed no statistically significant differences between the baseline and all MCLs for any spatial frequency (p > 0.05 in all cases). Comparison of CSF-T results showed a statistically significant difference only for 4 cpd (p = 0.002). Comparison of CSF-D results showed no statistically significant difference for all frequencies (p > 0.05 in all cases). The MCL designs analyzed provided satisfactory achromatic contrast sensitivity results for distance vision, similar to those obtained with spectacles, with no remarkable differences between designs. Chromatic contrast sensitivity for the red-green and blue-yellow mechanisms revealed some differences from the baseline that should be further investigated in future studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vision (Switzerland)
Vision (Switzerland) Health Professions-Optometry
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信