Teresa Bernadette Steinbichler, Birte Bender, Roland Hartl, Verena Strasser, Daniel Sontheimer, Sladjana Buricic, Barbara Kofler, Birgit Högl, Herbert Riechelmann, Benedikt Hofauer
{"title":"悬垂腭咽成形术与扩张括约肌咽成形术:单中心经验。","authors":"Teresa Bernadette Steinbichler, Birte Bender, Roland Hartl, Verena Strasser, Daniel Sontheimer, Sladjana Buricic, Barbara Kofler, Birgit Högl, Herbert Riechelmann, Benedikt Hofauer","doi":"10.3390/clockssleep7030038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP) and expansion sphincter pharyngoplasty (ESP) are two standard surgical procedures for the treatment of snoring and obstructive sleep apnea. In a retrospective clinical trial, we compared the two surgical techniques regarding objective sleep parameters and patients' reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients treated with UPPP or ESP between January 2016 and February 2020 were included in this retrospective clinical trial. Pre- and postoperative AHI, BMI, and smoking habits were recorded. Subjective improvement was assessed by the ESS score and symptom relief reported by patients and their bed partners.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2016 and 2020, 114 patients were included in the study, 74 patients suffered from OSA, and 30 patients had non-apnoeic snoring (AHI < 5/h). No preoperative sleeping studies were available in 10 patients (10/114; 9%). Based on the findings during drug-induced sedation endoscopy, most patients received an ESP (71/114, 62%), and 43 patients received a UPPP (43/114, 38%). Additionally, in 52/114 (46%), radio frequency ablation of the tongue base was performed if DISE revealed retrolingual collapse. ESP reduced AHI from 21.1 ± 10.8/h to 13.3 ± 12.1/h (<i>p</i> = 0.04), whereas UPPP caused a non-significant decrease in the AHI from 25.0 ± 13.8/h to 18.2 ± 14.6/h (<i>p</i> = 0.6). A minor secondary bleeding was observed in 32 patients, which was effectively treated with electrocautery or conservative therapy (32/114). This was more common in the ESP group (22/71; 31%) than in the UPPP group (10/43; 23%). Postoperative need for analgesics was higher in the ESP group than in the UPPP group. The ESS score showed no significant improvement after UPPP or ESP (<i>p</i> = 0.3), but subjective improvement in snoring was reported by 87/114 (76%) patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AHI reduction was significantly higher in the ESP patient group than in the UPPP group. ESP patients had a slightly higher rate of minor secondary bleeding and postoperative need for analgesics than UPPP patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":33568,"journal":{"name":"Clocks & Sleep","volume":"7 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12372106/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty Versus Expansion Sphincter Pharyngoplasty: A Single Centre Experience.\",\"authors\":\"Teresa Bernadette Steinbichler, Birte Bender, Roland Hartl, Verena Strasser, Daniel Sontheimer, Sladjana Buricic, Barbara Kofler, Birgit Högl, Herbert Riechelmann, Benedikt Hofauer\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/clockssleep7030038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP) and expansion sphincter pharyngoplasty (ESP) are two standard surgical procedures for the treatment of snoring and obstructive sleep apnea. In a retrospective clinical trial, we compared the two surgical techniques regarding objective sleep parameters and patients' reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients treated with UPPP or ESP between January 2016 and February 2020 were included in this retrospective clinical trial. Pre- and postoperative AHI, BMI, and smoking habits were recorded. Subjective improvement was assessed by the ESS score and symptom relief reported by patients and their bed partners.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2016 and 2020, 114 patients were included in the study, 74 patients suffered from OSA, and 30 patients had non-apnoeic snoring (AHI < 5/h). No preoperative sleeping studies were available in 10 patients (10/114; 9%). Based on the findings during drug-induced sedation endoscopy, most patients received an ESP (71/114, 62%), and 43 patients received a UPPP (43/114, 38%). Additionally, in 52/114 (46%), radio frequency ablation of the tongue base was performed if DISE revealed retrolingual collapse. ESP reduced AHI from 21.1 ± 10.8/h to 13.3 ± 12.1/h (<i>p</i> = 0.04), whereas UPPP caused a non-significant decrease in the AHI from 25.0 ± 13.8/h to 18.2 ± 14.6/h (<i>p</i> = 0.6). A minor secondary bleeding was observed in 32 patients, which was effectively treated with electrocautery or conservative therapy (32/114). This was more common in the ESP group (22/71; 31%) than in the UPPP group (10/43; 23%). Postoperative need for analgesics was higher in the ESP group than in the UPPP group. The ESS score showed no significant improvement after UPPP or ESP (<i>p</i> = 0.3), but subjective improvement in snoring was reported by 87/114 (76%) patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AHI reduction was significantly higher in the ESP patient group than in the UPPP group. ESP patients had a slightly higher rate of minor secondary bleeding and postoperative need for analgesics than UPPP patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clocks & Sleep\",\"volume\":\"7 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12372106/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clocks & Sleep\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/clockssleep7030038\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clocks & Sleep","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/clockssleep7030038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty Versus Expansion Sphincter Pharyngoplasty: A Single Centre Experience.
Background: Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP) and expansion sphincter pharyngoplasty (ESP) are two standard surgical procedures for the treatment of snoring and obstructive sleep apnea. In a retrospective clinical trial, we compared the two surgical techniques regarding objective sleep parameters and patients' reported outcomes.
Materials and methods: Patients treated with UPPP or ESP between January 2016 and February 2020 were included in this retrospective clinical trial. Pre- and postoperative AHI, BMI, and smoking habits were recorded. Subjective improvement was assessed by the ESS score and symptom relief reported by patients and their bed partners.
Results: Between 2016 and 2020, 114 patients were included in the study, 74 patients suffered from OSA, and 30 patients had non-apnoeic snoring (AHI < 5/h). No preoperative sleeping studies were available in 10 patients (10/114; 9%). Based on the findings during drug-induced sedation endoscopy, most patients received an ESP (71/114, 62%), and 43 patients received a UPPP (43/114, 38%). Additionally, in 52/114 (46%), radio frequency ablation of the tongue base was performed if DISE revealed retrolingual collapse. ESP reduced AHI from 21.1 ± 10.8/h to 13.3 ± 12.1/h (p = 0.04), whereas UPPP caused a non-significant decrease in the AHI from 25.0 ± 13.8/h to 18.2 ± 14.6/h (p = 0.6). A minor secondary bleeding was observed in 32 patients, which was effectively treated with electrocautery or conservative therapy (32/114). This was more common in the ESP group (22/71; 31%) than in the UPPP group (10/43; 23%). Postoperative need for analgesics was higher in the ESP group than in the UPPP group. The ESS score showed no significant improvement after UPPP or ESP (p = 0.3), but subjective improvement in snoring was reported by 87/114 (76%) patients.
Conclusion: AHI reduction was significantly higher in the ESP patient group than in the UPPP group. ESP patients had a slightly higher rate of minor secondary bleeding and postoperative need for analgesics than UPPP patients.