ChatGPT-3.5用于评估孕期非处方药使用的准确性和安全性:一项描述性比较研究。

IF 1.8 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Pharmacy Pub Date : 2025-07-30 DOI:10.3390/pharmacy13040104
Bernadette Cornelison, David R Axon, Bryan Abbott, Carter Bishop, Cindy Jebara, Anjali Kumar, Kristen A Root
{"title":"ChatGPT-3.5用于评估孕期非处方药使用的准确性和安全性:一项描述性比较研究。","authors":"Bernadette Cornelison, David R Axon, Bryan Abbott, Carter Bishop, Cindy Jebara, Anjali Kumar, Kristen A Root","doi":"10.3390/pharmacy13040104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly utilized to perform tasks requiring human intelligence, patients who are pregnant may turn to AI for advice on over-the-counter (OTC) medications. However, medications used in pregnancy may pose profound safety concerns limited by data availability. This study focuses on a chatbot's ability to accurately provide information regarding OTC medications as it relates to patients that are pregnant. A prospective, descriptive design was used to compare the responses generated by the Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer 3.5 (ChatGPT-3.5) to the information provided by UpToDate<sup>®</sup>. Eighty-seven of the top pharmacist-recommended OTC drugs in the United States (U.S.) as identified by Pharmacy Times were assessed for safe use in pregnancy using ChatGPT-3.5. A piloted, standard prompt was input into ChatGPT-3.5, and the responses were recorded. Two groups independently rated the responses compared to UpToDate on their correctness, completeness, and safety using a 5-point Likert scale. After independent evaluations, the groups discussed the findings to reach a consensus, with a third independent investigator giving final ratings. For correctness, the median score was 5 (interquartile range [IQR]: 5-5). For completeness, the median score was 4 (IQR: 4-5). For safety, the median score was 5 (IQR: 5-5). Despite high overall scores, the safety errors in 9% of the evaluations (<i>n</i> = 8), including omissions that pose a risk of serious complications, currently renders the chatbot an unsafe standalone resource for this purpose.</p>","PeriodicalId":30544,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy","volume":"13 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12389367/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy and Safety of ChatGPT-3.5 in Assessing Over-the-Counter Medication Use During Pregnancy: A Descriptive Comparative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Bernadette Cornelison, David R Axon, Bryan Abbott, Carter Bishop, Cindy Jebara, Anjali Kumar, Kristen A Root\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/pharmacy13040104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly utilized to perform tasks requiring human intelligence, patients who are pregnant may turn to AI for advice on over-the-counter (OTC) medications. However, medications used in pregnancy may pose profound safety concerns limited by data availability. This study focuses on a chatbot's ability to accurately provide information regarding OTC medications as it relates to patients that are pregnant. A prospective, descriptive design was used to compare the responses generated by the Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer 3.5 (ChatGPT-3.5) to the information provided by UpToDate<sup>®</sup>. Eighty-seven of the top pharmacist-recommended OTC drugs in the United States (U.S.) as identified by Pharmacy Times were assessed for safe use in pregnancy using ChatGPT-3.5. A piloted, standard prompt was input into ChatGPT-3.5, and the responses were recorded. Two groups independently rated the responses compared to UpToDate on their correctness, completeness, and safety using a 5-point Likert scale. After independent evaluations, the groups discussed the findings to reach a consensus, with a third independent investigator giving final ratings. For correctness, the median score was 5 (interquartile range [IQR]: 5-5). For completeness, the median score was 4 (IQR: 4-5). For safety, the median score was 5 (IQR: 5-5). Despite high overall scores, the safety errors in 9% of the evaluations (<i>n</i> = 8), including omissions that pose a risk of serious complications, currently renders the chatbot an unsafe standalone resource for this purpose.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":30544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"13 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12389367/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy13040104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy13040104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着人工智能(AI)越来越多地用于执行需要人类智能的任务,孕妇可能会向人工智能咨询非处方药(OTC)的建议。然而,怀孕期间使用的药物可能会受到数据可用性的限制,造成严重的安全问题。这项研究的重点是聊天机器人准确提供有关非处方药信息的能力,因为它与孕妇有关。采用前瞻性描述性设计将聊天生成预训练转换器3.5 (ChatGPT-3.5)生成的响应与UpToDate®提供的信息进行比较。通过ChatGPT-3.5评估了美国药剂师推荐的87种顶级OTC药物在怀孕期间的安全使用。在ChatGPT-3.5中输入一个引导的标准提示,并记录响应。与UpToDate相比,两组使用5分李克特量表独立评估了答案的正确性、完整性和安全性。在独立评估之后,小组讨论结果以达成共识,由第三个独立调查员给出最终评级。正确性中位数为5分(四分位间距[IQR]: 5-5)。为了完整性,中位得分为4 (IQR: 4-5)。在安全性方面,中位得分为5分(IQR: 5-5)。尽管总体得分很高,但9%的评估(n = 8)存在安全错误,包括可能导致严重并发症的遗漏,目前使聊天机器人成为不安全的独立资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accuracy and Safety of ChatGPT-3.5 in Assessing Over-the-Counter Medication Use During Pregnancy: A Descriptive Comparative Study.

As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly utilized to perform tasks requiring human intelligence, patients who are pregnant may turn to AI for advice on over-the-counter (OTC) medications. However, medications used in pregnancy may pose profound safety concerns limited by data availability. This study focuses on a chatbot's ability to accurately provide information regarding OTC medications as it relates to patients that are pregnant. A prospective, descriptive design was used to compare the responses generated by the Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer 3.5 (ChatGPT-3.5) to the information provided by UpToDate®. Eighty-seven of the top pharmacist-recommended OTC drugs in the United States (U.S.) as identified by Pharmacy Times were assessed for safe use in pregnancy using ChatGPT-3.5. A piloted, standard prompt was input into ChatGPT-3.5, and the responses were recorded. Two groups independently rated the responses compared to UpToDate on their correctness, completeness, and safety using a 5-point Likert scale. After independent evaluations, the groups discussed the findings to reach a consensus, with a third independent investigator giving final ratings. For correctness, the median score was 5 (interquartile range [IQR]: 5-5). For completeness, the median score was 4 (IQR: 4-5). For safety, the median score was 5 (IQR: 5-5). Despite high overall scores, the safety errors in 9% of the evaluations (n = 8), including omissions that pose a risk of serious complications, currently renders the chatbot an unsafe standalone resource for this purpose.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmacy
Pharmacy PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
9.10%
发文量
141
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信