胰腺功能脏器功能障碍的手动诊断方案的相互可靠性。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Miguel Faria, Nuno Machado, Marcos Correia de Sousa, Patrícia Maria Pires, Telma Pires
{"title":"胰腺功能脏器功能障碍的手动诊断方案的相互可靠性。","authors":"Miguel Faria, Nuno Machado, Marcos Correia de Sousa, Patrícia Maria Pires, Telma Pires","doi":"10.1177/27683605251372011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> A reliable manual examination has not been validated as a diagnostic tool for nociplastic visceral pain. <b><i>Aims:</i></b> To establish the interrater reliability of a manual examination protocol for functional pancreatic visceral dysfunction and the clinical criteria for a manual palpatory diagnosis based on the clinical features of the nociplastic visceral pain. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This double-blind cross-sectional study involved 60 participants assessed by three raters using a manual protocol for diagnosing functional pancreatic visceral dysfunction. Five palpation-based criteria were evaluated: (1) local pain, (2) referred pain, (3) neurovegetative symptoms, (4) hyperalgesia or allodynia, and (5) tissue resistance/density. Interrater agreement was measured using percentage agreement and Fleiss' kappa. The reliability of the Verbal Numerical Rating Scale (vNRS) was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Repeated measures analysis of variance and Cochran's Q test (with Bonferroni correction) were used to analyze vNRS scores and categorical outcomes, respectively. Significance was set at <i>p</i> < 0.05. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Criteria 1, 3, and 4 showed particularly high levels of agreement, with overall agreement percentages of 93.3%, 95.6%, and 95.6%, respectively. The corresponding Fleiss' kappa values were 0.863, 0.880, and 0.908, indicating almost perfect agreement. In contrast, Criteria 2 and 5 demonstrated substantial, but comparatively lower, agreement, with overall percentages of 86.7% and 87.8% and Fleiss' kappa values of 0.679 and 0.755. The vNRS demonstrated excellent reliability across all three pancreas regions, with ICC values well >0.90: head (ICC = 0.943, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.913-0.964), body (ICC = 0.950, 95% CI = 0.923-0.968), and tail (ICC = 0.963, 95% CI = 0.944-0.977). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Three blinded raters reached an almost perfect pair-wise interrater agreement on the presence or absence of functional visceral dysfunction in the topographic projection of the pancreas. This study provides preliminary evidence that a manual diagnostic protocol is a reliable and potentially useful diagnostic tool in diagnosing nociplastic pain in the topographic projection of the pancreas. Future research should prioritize evaluating the validity of the nociplastic visceral pain diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":29734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interrater Reliability of a Manual Diagnostic Protocol for Pancreatic Functional Visceral Dysfunction.\",\"authors\":\"Miguel Faria, Nuno Machado, Marcos Correia de Sousa, Patrícia Maria Pires, Telma Pires\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/27683605251372011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> A reliable manual examination has not been validated as a diagnostic tool for nociplastic visceral pain. <b><i>Aims:</i></b> To establish the interrater reliability of a manual examination protocol for functional pancreatic visceral dysfunction and the clinical criteria for a manual palpatory diagnosis based on the clinical features of the nociplastic visceral pain. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This double-blind cross-sectional study involved 60 participants assessed by three raters using a manual protocol for diagnosing functional pancreatic visceral dysfunction. Five palpation-based criteria were evaluated: (1) local pain, (2) referred pain, (3) neurovegetative symptoms, (4) hyperalgesia or allodynia, and (5) tissue resistance/density. Interrater agreement was measured using percentage agreement and Fleiss' kappa. The reliability of the Verbal Numerical Rating Scale (vNRS) was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Repeated measures analysis of variance and Cochran's Q test (with Bonferroni correction) were used to analyze vNRS scores and categorical outcomes, respectively. Significance was set at <i>p</i> < 0.05. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Criteria 1, 3, and 4 showed particularly high levels of agreement, with overall agreement percentages of 93.3%, 95.6%, and 95.6%, respectively. The corresponding Fleiss' kappa values were 0.863, 0.880, and 0.908, indicating almost perfect agreement. In contrast, Criteria 2 and 5 demonstrated substantial, but comparatively lower, agreement, with overall percentages of 86.7% and 87.8% and Fleiss' kappa values of 0.679 and 0.755. The vNRS demonstrated excellent reliability across all three pancreas regions, with ICC values well >0.90: head (ICC = 0.943, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.913-0.964), body (ICC = 0.950, 95% CI = 0.923-0.968), and tail (ICC = 0.963, 95% CI = 0.944-0.977). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Three blinded raters reached an almost perfect pair-wise interrater agreement on the presence or absence of functional visceral dysfunction in the topographic projection of the pancreas. This study provides preliminary evidence that a manual diagnostic protocol is a reliable and potentially useful diagnostic tool in diagnosing nociplastic pain in the topographic projection of the pancreas. Future research should prioritize evaluating the validity of the nociplastic visceral pain diagnosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/27683605251372011\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27683605251372011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:一种可靠的人工检查尚未被证实是一种诊断有害内脏疼痛的工具。目的:建立功能性胰腺脏器功能障碍手工检查方案的互信度和基于致害性内脏疼痛临床特征的手动触诊诊断标准。方法:这项双盲横断面研究涉及60名参与者,由三名评分者评估,使用手动方案诊断功能性胰腺内脏功能障碍。评估了五项基于触诊的标准:(1)局部疼痛,(2)牵涉性疼痛,(3)神经植物症状,(4)痛觉过敏或异常性疼痛,(5)组织阻力/密度。采用一致性百分比和Fleiss kappa来衡量评判者之间的一致性。采用类内相关系数(ICC)对言语数值评定量表(vNRS)的信度进行评价。分别采用重复测量方差分析和Cochran’s Q检验(Bonferroni校正)分析vNRS评分和分类结果。p < 0.05为显著性。结果:标准1、3和4显示出特别高的一致性,总体一致性百分比分别为93.3%、95.6%和95.6%。对应的Fleiss’kappa值分别为0.863、0.880和0.908,几乎完全吻合。相比之下,标准2和标准5显示了大量但相对较低的一致性,总体百分比为86.7%和87.8%,Fleiss的kappa值为0.679和0.755。vNRS在所有三个胰腺区域显示出极好的可靠性,ICC值为>0.90:头部(ICC = 0.943, 95%可信区间[CI] = 0.913-0.964),身体(ICC = 0.950, 95% CI = 0.923-0.968)和尾部(ICC = 0.963, 95% CI = 0.944-0.977)。结论:三名盲法评分者在胰腺地形投影中是否存在功能性内脏功能障碍方面达成了几乎完美的两两交叉评分一致。本研究提供了初步的证据,证明手动诊断方案是诊断胰腺地形投影中致害性疼痛的可靠和潜在有用的诊断工具。未来的研究应优先评估伤害性内脏痛诊断的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interrater Reliability of a Manual Diagnostic Protocol for Pancreatic Functional Visceral Dysfunction.

Background: A reliable manual examination has not been validated as a diagnostic tool for nociplastic visceral pain. Aims: To establish the interrater reliability of a manual examination protocol for functional pancreatic visceral dysfunction and the clinical criteria for a manual palpatory diagnosis based on the clinical features of the nociplastic visceral pain. Methods: This double-blind cross-sectional study involved 60 participants assessed by three raters using a manual protocol for diagnosing functional pancreatic visceral dysfunction. Five palpation-based criteria were evaluated: (1) local pain, (2) referred pain, (3) neurovegetative symptoms, (4) hyperalgesia or allodynia, and (5) tissue resistance/density. Interrater agreement was measured using percentage agreement and Fleiss' kappa. The reliability of the Verbal Numerical Rating Scale (vNRS) was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Repeated measures analysis of variance and Cochran's Q test (with Bonferroni correction) were used to analyze vNRS scores and categorical outcomes, respectively. Significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: Criteria 1, 3, and 4 showed particularly high levels of agreement, with overall agreement percentages of 93.3%, 95.6%, and 95.6%, respectively. The corresponding Fleiss' kappa values were 0.863, 0.880, and 0.908, indicating almost perfect agreement. In contrast, Criteria 2 and 5 demonstrated substantial, but comparatively lower, agreement, with overall percentages of 86.7% and 87.8% and Fleiss' kappa values of 0.679 and 0.755. The vNRS demonstrated excellent reliability across all three pancreas regions, with ICC values well >0.90: head (ICC = 0.943, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.913-0.964), body (ICC = 0.950, 95% CI = 0.923-0.968), and tail (ICC = 0.963, 95% CI = 0.944-0.977). Conclusions: Three blinded raters reached an almost perfect pair-wise interrater agreement on the presence or absence of functional visceral dysfunction in the topographic projection of the pancreas. This study provides preliminary evidence that a manual diagnostic protocol is a reliable and potentially useful diagnostic tool in diagnosing nociplastic pain in the topographic projection of the pancreas. Future research should prioritize evaluating the validity of the nociplastic visceral pain diagnosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信