{"title":"【胎儿外耳异常的磁共振成像诊断价值研究】。","authors":"K Y Wang, X L Wang, Y T Liang, B Li","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20241128-00660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To investigate the diagnostic value of fetal MRI in external ear abnormalities. <b>Methods:</b> 28 fetuses with suspected ear abnormalities based on ultrasound and MRI in Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University from August 2019 to February 2024 were enrolled retrospectively. The morphology of fetal auricle and external auditory canal were observed to determine the types of external ear abnormalities. The results of postpartum physical examination were taken as the gold standard, paired <i>χ<sup>2</sup></i> test and <i>kappa</i> test were used with SPSS 21.0 software to compare the difference and consistency of fetal MRI and ultrasound in diagnosis of external ear abnormalities. <b>Results:</b> 22 cases (31 ears) of microtia were found, of which 30 ears were detected by MRI (sensitivity 96.8%, specificity 100%, accuracy 98.2%) and 28 ears were detected by ultrasound (sensitivity 87.1%, specificity 96.0%, accuracy 91.1%). The detection rates of the two methods were higher in MRI, but there was no statistically significant difference between MRI and ultrasound in diagnosis of microtia (<i>P</i>=0.688), and the results of the two examinations were consistent (<i>kappa</i>=0.786, <i>P<</i>0.001). 24 ears of external auditory canal atresia were all correctly diagnosed by MRI. However, ultrasound could not detect any external auditory canal atresia. <b>Conclusion:</b> The diagnostic ability of MRI for fetal external ear abnormalities was similar to that of ultrasound, and it showed obvious advantages in the diagnosis of external ear canal atresia.</p>","PeriodicalId":23987,"journal":{"name":"Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery","volume":"60 8","pages":"911-916"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Study on the diagnostic value of fetal magnetic resonance imaging of external ear abnormalities].\",\"authors\":\"K Y Wang, X L Wang, Y T Liang, B Li\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20241128-00660\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To investigate the diagnostic value of fetal MRI in external ear abnormalities. <b>Methods:</b> 28 fetuses with suspected ear abnormalities based on ultrasound and MRI in Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University from August 2019 to February 2024 were enrolled retrospectively. The morphology of fetal auricle and external auditory canal were observed to determine the types of external ear abnormalities. The results of postpartum physical examination were taken as the gold standard, paired <i>χ<sup>2</sup></i> test and <i>kappa</i> test were used with SPSS 21.0 software to compare the difference and consistency of fetal MRI and ultrasound in diagnosis of external ear abnormalities. <b>Results:</b> 22 cases (31 ears) of microtia were found, of which 30 ears were detected by MRI (sensitivity 96.8%, specificity 100%, accuracy 98.2%) and 28 ears were detected by ultrasound (sensitivity 87.1%, specificity 96.0%, accuracy 91.1%). The detection rates of the two methods were higher in MRI, but there was no statistically significant difference between MRI and ultrasound in diagnosis of microtia (<i>P</i>=0.688), and the results of the two examinations were consistent (<i>kappa</i>=0.786, <i>P<</i>0.001). 24 ears of external auditory canal atresia were all correctly diagnosed by MRI. However, ultrasound could not detect any external auditory canal atresia. <b>Conclusion:</b> The diagnostic ability of MRI for fetal external ear abnormalities was similar to that of ultrasound, and it showed obvious advantages in the diagnosis of external ear canal atresia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23987,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery\",\"volume\":\"60 8\",\"pages\":\"911-916\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20241128-00660\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20241128-00660","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Study on the diagnostic value of fetal magnetic resonance imaging of external ear abnormalities].
Objective: To investigate the diagnostic value of fetal MRI in external ear abnormalities. Methods: 28 fetuses with suspected ear abnormalities based on ultrasound and MRI in Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University from August 2019 to February 2024 were enrolled retrospectively. The morphology of fetal auricle and external auditory canal were observed to determine the types of external ear abnormalities. The results of postpartum physical examination were taken as the gold standard, paired χ2 test and kappa test were used with SPSS 21.0 software to compare the difference and consistency of fetal MRI and ultrasound in diagnosis of external ear abnormalities. Results: 22 cases (31 ears) of microtia were found, of which 30 ears were detected by MRI (sensitivity 96.8%, specificity 100%, accuracy 98.2%) and 28 ears were detected by ultrasound (sensitivity 87.1%, specificity 96.0%, accuracy 91.1%). The detection rates of the two methods were higher in MRI, but there was no statistically significant difference between MRI and ultrasound in diagnosis of microtia (P=0.688), and the results of the two examinations were consistent (kappa=0.786, P<0.001). 24 ears of external auditory canal atresia were all correctly diagnosed by MRI. However, ultrasound could not detect any external auditory canal atresia. Conclusion: The diagnostic ability of MRI for fetal external ear abnormalities was similar to that of ultrasound, and it showed obvious advantages in the diagnosis of external ear canal atresia.
期刊介绍:
Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery is a high-level medical science and technology journal sponsored and published directly by the Chinese Medical Association, reflecting the significant research progress in the field of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery in China, and striving to promote the domestic and international academic exchanges for the purpose of running the journal.
Over the years, the journal has been ranked first in the total citation frequency list of national scientific and technical journals published by the Documentation and Intelligence Center of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the China Science Citation Database, and has always ranked first among the scientific and technical journals in the related fields.
Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery has been included in the authoritative databases PubMed, Chinese core journals, CSCD.