经皮肾镜取石术后药物预防血栓的安全性和有效性:一项回顾性队列研究。

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Behnam Shakiba, Nasim Torabi, Robab Maghsoudi, Vahid Vahedi, Mohammadreza Padooiy Nooshabadi, Ali Faegh
{"title":"经皮肾镜取石术后药物预防血栓的安全性和有效性:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Behnam Shakiba, Nasim Torabi, Robab Maghsoudi, Vahid Vahedi, Mohammadreza Padooiy Nooshabadi, Ali Faegh","doi":"10.1007/s00345-025-05905-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the standard treatment for large or complex renal stones; however, it carries risks such as bleeding and venous thromboembolism (VTE). Current guidelines do not recommend routine pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in these patients due to concerns about bleeding and limited supporting evidence. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of unfractionated heparin thromboprophylaxis in patients at moderate to high VTE risk undergoing PCNL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, 202 patients undergoing PCNL were assigned to either heparin prophylaxis (n = 79) or early ambulation without pharmacologic prophylaxis (n = 123). Baseline demographics, stone characteristics, operative parameters, and postoperative outcomes-including bleeding, transfusion, complications, hemoglobin drop, and thromboembolic events were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients receiving heparin were older (55.1 vs. 44.5 years, p < 0.001) and had higher BMI (median 28.9 vs. 26.5 kg/m², p = 0.001). No significant differences were observed in stone size, location, surgery duration, hemoglobin drop, transfusion rates, or overall complications. Access tract length was slightly longer in the heparin group (p = 0.028). Thromboembolic events were rare and did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.282). Notably, in the early ambulation group, one patient experienced deep vein thrombosis and two developed pulmonary thromboembolism (one fatal).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis with unfractionated heparin after PCNL appears safe without increased bleeding risk. While our findings suggest a potential benefit in reducing thromboembolic events in moderate- to high-risk patients, the limited sample size and retrospective design preclude definitive conclusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":23954,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Urology","volume":"43 1","pages":"525"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and efficacy of Pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Behnam Shakiba, Nasim Torabi, Robab Maghsoudi, Vahid Vahedi, Mohammadreza Padooiy Nooshabadi, Ali Faegh\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00345-025-05905-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the standard treatment for large or complex renal stones; however, it carries risks such as bleeding and venous thromboembolism (VTE). Current guidelines do not recommend routine pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in these patients due to concerns about bleeding and limited supporting evidence. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of unfractionated heparin thromboprophylaxis in patients at moderate to high VTE risk undergoing PCNL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, 202 patients undergoing PCNL were assigned to either heparin prophylaxis (n = 79) or early ambulation without pharmacologic prophylaxis (n = 123). Baseline demographics, stone characteristics, operative parameters, and postoperative outcomes-including bleeding, transfusion, complications, hemoglobin drop, and thromboembolic events were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients receiving heparin were older (55.1 vs. 44.5 years, p < 0.001) and had higher BMI (median 28.9 vs. 26.5 kg/m², p = 0.001). No significant differences were observed in stone size, location, surgery duration, hemoglobin drop, transfusion rates, or overall complications. Access tract length was slightly longer in the heparin group (p = 0.028). Thromboembolic events were rare and did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.282). Notably, in the early ambulation group, one patient experienced deep vein thrombosis and two developed pulmonary thromboembolism (one fatal).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis with unfractionated heparin after PCNL appears safe without increased bleeding risk. While our findings suggest a potential benefit in reducing thromboembolic events in moderate- to high-risk patients, the limited sample size and retrospective design preclude definitive conclusions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"525\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-025-05905-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-025-05905-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)是治疗大型或复杂肾结石的标准方法;然而,它有出血和静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)等风险。目前的指南不建议对这些患者进行常规药物血栓预防,因为担心出血和支持证据有限。本研究评估了在接受PCNL的中度至高度静脉血栓栓塞风险患者中使用无分级肝素预防血栓形成的安全性和有效性。方法:在这项回顾性队列研究中,202例接受PCNL的患者被分配到肝素预防组(n = 79)或不进行药物预防的早期活动组(n = 123)。比较基线人口统计学、结石特征、手术参数和术后结果,包括出血、输血、并发症、血红蛋白下降和血栓栓塞事件。结果:接受肝素治疗的患者年龄较大(55.1岁vs. 44.5岁)。结论:PCNL后使用未分离肝素的药物血栓预防是安全的,不会增加出血风险。虽然我们的研究结果表明在减少中高风险患者的血栓栓塞事件方面有潜在的益处,但有限的样本量和回顾性设计排除了明确的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety and efficacy of Pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a retrospective cohort study.

Background: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the standard treatment for large or complex renal stones; however, it carries risks such as bleeding and venous thromboembolism (VTE). Current guidelines do not recommend routine pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in these patients due to concerns about bleeding and limited supporting evidence. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of unfractionated heparin thromboprophylaxis in patients at moderate to high VTE risk undergoing PCNL.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 202 patients undergoing PCNL were assigned to either heparin prophylaxis (n = 79) or early ambulation without pharmacologic prophylaxis (n = 123). Baseline demographics, stone characteristics, operative parameters, and postoperative outcomes-including bleeding, transfusion, complications, hemoglobin drop, and thromboembolic events were compared.

Results: Patients receiving heparin were older (55.1 vs. 44.5 years, p < 0.001) and had higher BMI (median 28.9 vs. 26.5 kg/m², p = 0.001). No significant differences were observed in stone size, location, surgery duration, hemoglobin drop, transfusion rates, or overall complications. Access tract length was slightly longer in the heparin group (p = 0.028). Thromboembolic events were rare and did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.282). Notably, in the early ambulation group, one patient experienced deep vein thrombosis and two developed pulmonary thromboembolism (one fatal).

Conclusions: Pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis with unfractionated heparin after PCNL appears safe without increased bleeding risk. While our findings suggest a potential benefit in reducing thromboembolic events in moderate- to high-risk patients, the limited sample size and retrospective design preclude definitive conclusions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Urology
World Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.80%
发文量
317
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY conveys regularly the essential results of urological research and their practical and clinical relevance to a broad audience of urologists in research and clinical practice. In order to guarantee a balanced program, articles are published to reflect the developments in all fields of urology on an internationally advanced level. Each issue treats a main topic in review articles of invited international experts. Free papers are unrelated articles to the main topic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信