你是一个秘密的二元论者吗?来自简短内隐联想任务的证据。

Q1 Social Sciences
Open Mind Pub Date : 2025-07-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1162/opmi.a.7
Iris Berent, Alexzander Sansiveri
{"title":"你是一个秘密的二元论者吗?来自简短内隐联想任务的证据。","authors":"Iris Berent, Alexzander Sansiveri","doi":"10.1162/opmi.a.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Do people tacitly contrast minds and bodies? To find out, here, we gauge Dualism using a brief implicit association task. Participants were asked to determine whether a target word belonged to a category-attribute pair. Categories were either body or mind; attributes captured either physical properties of bodies (e.g., object/solid) or their converse (e.g., stuff/airy). Results from five experiments showed that physical properties selectively facilitated responses only to body (but not mind). In Experiments 3-5, responses to mind were further facilitated by airy (relative to solid). Together, these results suggest that people tacitly view the mind as ethereal, distinct from the physical body. Remarkably, this was the case even in participants who explicitly rejected Dualism. Dualism, then, is an implicit bias that persists despite explicit attitudes to the contrary. These conclusions shed light on why educated Western adults contrast minds and bodies.</p>","PeriodicalId":32558,"journal":{"name":"Open Mind","volume":"9 ","pages":"864-884"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12373452/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are You a Closet Dualist? Evidence From Brief Implicit Association Task.\",\"authors\":\"Iris Berent, Alexzander Sansiveri\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/opmi.a.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Do people tacitly contrast minds and bodies? To find out, here, we gauge Dualism using a brief implicit association task. Participants were asked to determine whether a target word belonged to a category-attribute pair. Categories were either body or mind; attributes captured either physical properties of bodies (e.g., object/solid) or their converse (e.g., stuff/airy). Results from five experiments showed that physical properties selectively facilitated responses only to body (but not mind). In Experiments 3-5, responses to mind were further facilitated by airy (relative to solid). Together, these results suggest that people tacitly view the mind as ethereal, distinct from the physical body. Remarkably, this was the case even in participants who explicitly rejected Dualism. Dualism, then, is an implicit bias that persists despite explicit attitudes to the contrary. These conclusions shed light on why educated Western adults contrast minds and bodies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":32558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Mind\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"864-884\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12373452/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Mind\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1162/opmi.a.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Mind","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/opmi.a.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们会心照不宣地把思想和身体进行对比吗?为了找到答案,在这里,我们用一个简短的内隐联想任务来衡量二元论。参与者被要求判断目标单词是否属于类别-属性对。范畴要么是身体要么是精神;属性捕获物体的物理属性(例如,物体/固体)或它们的反面(例如,物质/空气)。五个实验的结果表明,物理特性选择性地促进了对身体(而不是心灵)的反应。在实验3-5中,空气(相对于固体)进一步促进了对心灵的反应。综上所述,这些结果表明,人们默认心灵是虚无缥缈的,与肉体截然不同。值得注意的是,即使在明确拒绝二元论的参与者中也是如此。因此,二元论是一种隐性偏见,尽管明确的态度与之相反,但它仍然存在。这些结论揭示了为什么受过教育的西方成年人的思想和身体截然不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Are You a Closet Dualist? Evidence From Brief Implicit Association Task.

Are You a Closet Dualist? Evidence From Brief Implicit Association Task.

Are You a Closet Dualist? Evidence From Brief Implicit Association Task.

Are You a Closet Dualist? Evidence From Brief Implicit Association Task.

Do people tacitly contrast minds and bodies? To find out, here, we gauge Dualism using a brief implicit association task. Participants were asked to determine whether a target word belonged to a category-attribute pair. Categories were either body or mind; attributes captured either physical properties of bodies (e.g., object/solid) or their converse (e.g., stuff/airy). Results from five experiments showed that physical properties selectively facilitated responses only to body (but not mind). In Experiments 3-5, responses to mind were further facilitated by airy (relative to solid). Together, these results suggest that people tacitly view the mind as ethereal, distinct from the physical body. Remarkably, this was the case even in participants who explicitly rejected Dualism. Dualism, then, is an implicit bias that persists despite explicit attitudes to the contrary. These conclusions shed light on why educated Western adults contrast minds and bodies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Mind
Open Mind Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信