Simon Nennstiel, Ron Fried, Alexander Herner, Christoph Schlag
{"title":"电动螺旋肠镜辅助内镜逆行胆道造影在roux -en- y解剖患者中的应用。","authors":"Simon Nennstiel, Ron Fried, Alexander Herner, Christoph Schlag","doi":"10.4253/wjge.v17.i8.102787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In postsurgical upper gastrointestinal anatomy, motorized spiral enteroscopy (MSE) assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) was shown feasible and has the advantage that standard ERCP instruments can be used. Therefore, MSE-ERCP appears to be the optimal solution for postsurgical patients, especially with Roux-en-Y anatomy.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To show feasibility and safety of MSE-ERCP in patients with Roux-en-Y anatomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive MSE-ERCP procedures in patients with Roux-en-Y anatomy between September 2021 and May 2023 in an endoscopic tertiary referral center.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 26 MSE-ERCPs: (1) 18 MSE-ERCPs in 13 patients with Roux-en-Y anatomy after liver transplantation (<i>n</i> = 11) or gastrectomy (<i>n</i> = 2); and (2) Another 8 MSE-ERCP interventions in 5 patients with very long Roux-en-Y situation after gastric bypass. Overall success of reaching the biliary entry was 88% and further interventions were successful in 83% of patients. In very long alimentary limb situations, success of reaching the biliary entry was not-significantly lower compared to \"standard\" Roux-en-Y (75% <i>vs</i> 94%, <i>P</i> = 0.215). ERCP-interventions were not-significantly less successful in patients with native papilla compared to hepaticojejunostomy (63% <i>vs</i> 93%, <i>P</i> = 0.103). Mean intervention time was 105 minutes. Intervention times were longer in very long limb situations (133 minutes <i>vs</i> 91 minutes; <i>P</i> = 0.032). Overall, we observed three adverse events (<i>n</i> = 1 caused by enteroscopy, <i>n</i> = 1 caused by the biliary intervention, <i>n</i> = 1 unrelated to the procedure). In 15/26 cases (58%) MSE-ERCP was carried out on an outpatient basis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MSE-ERCP has been a promising technique for patients with Roux-en-Y reconstruction requiring biliary interventions. However, MSE was recently withdrawn from the market due to severe safety concerns, which were not observed in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":23953,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":"17 8","pages":"102787"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12362567/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Motorized spiral enteroscopy assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients with Roux-en-Y-anatomy.\",\"authors\":\"Simon Nennstiel, Ron Fried, Alexander Herner, Christoph Schlag\",\"doi\":\"10.4253/wjge.v17.i8.102787\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In postsurgical upper gastrointestinal anatomy, motorized spiral enteroscopy (MSE) assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) was shown feasible and has the advantage that standard ERCP instruments can be used. Therefore, MSE-ERCP appears to be the optimal solution for postsurgical patients, especially with Roux-en-Y anatomy.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To show feasibility and safety of MSE-ERCP in patients with Roux-en-Y anatomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive MSE-ERCP procedures in patients with Roux-en-Y anatomy between September 2021 and May 2023 in an endoscopic tertiary referral center.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 26 MSE-ERCPs: (1) 18 MSE-ERCPs in 13 patients with Roux-en-Y anatomy after liver transplantation (<i>n</i> = 11) or gastrectomy (<i>n</i> = 2); and (2) Another 8 MSE-ERCP interventions in 5 patients with very long Roux-en-Y situation after gastric bypass. Overall success of reaching the biliary entry was 88% and further interventions were successful in 83% of patients. In very long alimentary limb situations, success of reaching the biliary entry was not-significantly lower compared to \\\"standard\\\" Roux-en-Y (75% <i>vs</i> 94%, <i>P</i> = 0.215). ERCP-interventions were not-significantly less successful in patients with native papilla compared to hepaticojejunostomy (63% <i>vs</i> 93%, <i>P</i> = 0.103). Mean intervention time was 105 minutes. Intervention times were longer in very long limb situations (133 minutes <i>vs</i> 91 minutes; <i>P</i> = 0.032). Overall, we observed three adverse events (<i>n</i> = 1 caused by enteroscopy, <i>n</i> = 1 caused by the biliary intervention, <i>n</i> = 1 unrelated to the procedure). In 15/26 cases (58%) MSE-ERCP was carried out on an outpatient basis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MSE-ERCP has been a promising technique for patients with Roux-en-Y reconstruction requiring biliary interventions. However, MSE was recently withdrawn from the market due to severe safety concerns, which were not observed in this study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy\",\"volume\":\"17 8\",\"pages\":\"102787\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12362567/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v17.i8.102787\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v17.i8.102787","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:在手术后上消化道解剖中,电动螺旋肠镜(MSE)辅助内镜逆行胆管胰脏造影(ERCP)是可行的,且具有可使用标准ERCP器械的优势。因此,MSE-ERCP似乎是术后患者的最佳解决方案,特别是Roux-en-Y解剖。目的:探讨MSE-ERCP治疗Roux-en-Y解剖的可行性和安全性。方法:我们回顾性分析了2021年9月至2023年5月在内镜三级转诊中心进行Roux-en-Y解剖患者的所有连续MSE-ERCP手术。结果:我们确定了26例MSE-ERCPs:(1) 13例肝移植(n = 11)或胃切除术(n = 2)后Roux-en-Y解剖患者中18例MSE-ERCPs;(2)对5例胃旁路术后Roux-en-Y时间过长的患者进行8次MSE-ERCP干预。到达胆道入口的总体成功率为88%,进一步干预的成功率为83%。在非常长的消化肢体情况下,到达胆道入口的成功率与“标准”Roux-en-Y相比并没有显著降低(75% vs 94%, P = 0.215)。与肝空肠吻合术相比,原生乳头患者的ercp干预成功率没有显著降低(63% vs 93%, P = 0.103)。平均干预时间为105分钟。在非常长的肢体情况下,干预时间更长(133分钟vs 91分钟;P = 0.032)。总的来说,我们观察到3个不良事件(n = 1个由肠镜检查引起,n = 1个由胆道干预引起,n = 1个与手术无关)。在15/26例(58%)中,MSE-ERCP是在门诊基础上进行的。结论:MSE-ERCP在Roux-en-Y重建需要胆道干预的患者中是一种很有前途的技术。然而,由于严重的安全问题,MSE最近退出了市场,这在本研究中没有观察到。
Motorized spiral enteroscopy assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients with Roux-en-Y-anatomy.
Background: In postsurgical upper gastrointestinal anatomy, motorized spiral enteroscopy (MSE) assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) was shown feasible and has the advantage that standard ERCP instruments can be used. Therefore, MSE-ERCP appears to be the optimal solution for postsurgical patients, especially with Roux-en-Y anatomy.
Aim: To show feasibility and safety of MSE-ERCP in patients with Roux-en-Y anatomy.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive MSE-ERCP procedures in patients with Roux-en-Y anatomy between September 2021 and May 2023 in an endoscopic tertiary referral center.
Results: We identified 26 MSE-ERCPs: (1) 18 MSE-ERCPs in 13 patients with Roux-en-Y anatomy after liver transplantation (n = 11) or gastrectomy (n = 2); and (2) Another 8 MSE-ERCP interventions in 5 patients with very long Roux-en-Y situation after gastric bypass. Overall success of reaching the biliary entry was 88% and further interventions were successful in 83% of patients. In very long alimentary limb situations, success of reaching the biliary entry was not-significantly lower compared to "standard" Roux-en-Y (75% vs 94%, P = 0.215). ERCP-interventions were not-significantly less successful in patients with native papilla compared to hepaticojejunostomy (63% vs 93%, P = 0.103). Mean intervention time was 105 minutes. Intervention times were longer in very long limb situations (133 minutes vs 91 minutes; P = 0.032). Overall, we observed three adverse events (n = 1 caused by enteroscopy, n = 1 caused by the biliary intervention, n = 1 unrelated to the procedure). In 15/26 cases (58%) MSE-ERCP was carried out on an outpatient basis.
Conclusion: MSE-ERCP has been a promising technique for patients with Roux-en-Y reconstruction requiring biliary interventions. However, MSE was recently withdrawn from the market due to severe safety concerns, which were not observed in this study.