{"title":"Ki67密度图分析揭示不同犬肿瘤空间增殖模式的差异。","authors":"Brigandì Elena, Bacci Barbara, Brunetti Barbara, Rigillo Antonella, Roccabianca Paola, Bellini Giorgia, Chiappelli Chiara, Avallone Giancarlo","doi":"10.1111/vco.70019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mitotic count (MC) is a well-established prognostic factor in many canine malignancies. While standardisation efforts have improved inter-pathologist agreement regarding the morphology of mitotic figures and the size of the counting area, the selection of the tumour region for MC assessment remains to be standardised. This study aimed to evaluate the spatial distribution of the most proliferative areas in selected canine tumour types, using Ki67 immunohistochemistry, to identify optimal candidate regions for MC assessment. Tumour types analysed included melanomas, cutaneous mast cell tumours (cMCT), canine mammary carcinomas (CMC) and soft tissue sarcomas (STS). Using image analysis, Ki67 density maps were generated from digital slides and classified according to their distribution pattern (focal/multifocal or diffuse) and location within the tumour (central, peripheral or scattered). A total of 202 cases were included: 43 melanomas, 30 cMCTs, 42 CMCs and 87 cSTSs. The vast majority of tumours (92.6%) exhibited a multifocal hotspot distribution. Peripheral hotspot localisation was predominant in 55% of cases, particularly in cMCTs (73.3%) and melanomas (76.7%). In contrast, cSTSs more frequently showed a scattered hotspot pattern (60.9%) (χ<sup>2</sup> = 41.9; p < 0.001). CMCs had a higher proportion of centrally located hotspots (16.7%). These findings suggest that pathologists should focus on peripheral tumour regions when assessing MC in cMCTs and melanomas. Both central and peripheral regions should be considered in CMCs, while a more extensive, comprehensive evaluation may be required in STSs. The observed association between tumour histotype and proliferation pattern likely reflects inherent biological differences among the tumour types studied.</p>","PeriodicalId":23693,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary and comparative oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Ki67 Density Maps Reveals Variation of Spatial Proliferation Patterns in Different Canine Neoplasms.\",\"authors\":\"Brigandì Elena, Bacci Barbara, Brunetti Barbara, Rigillo Antonella, Roccabianca Paola, Bellini Giorgia, Chiappelli Chiara, Avallone Giancarlo\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/vco.70019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Mitotic count (MC) is a well-established prognostic factor in many canine malignancies. While standardisation efforts have improved inter-pathologist agreement regarding the morphology of mitotic figures and the size of the counting area, the selection of the tumour region for MC assessment remains to be standardised. This study aimed to evaluate the spatial distribution of the most proliferative areas in selected canine tumour types, using Ki67 immunohistochemistry, to identify optimal candidate regions for MC assessment. Tumour types analysed included melanomas, cutaneous mast cell tumours (cMCT), canine mammary carcinomas (CMC) and soft tissue sarcomas (STS). Using image analysis, Ki67 density maps were generated from digital slides and classified according to their distribution pattern (focal/multifocal or diffuse) and location within the tumour (central, peripheral or scattered). A total of 202 cases were included: 43 melanomas, 30 cMCTs, 42 CMCs and 87 cSTSs. The vast majority of tumours (92.6%) exhibited a multifocal hotspot distribution. Peripheral hotspot localisation was predominant in 55% of cases, particularly in cMCTs (73.3%) and melanomas (76.7%). In contrast, cSTSs more frequently showed a scattered hotspot pattern (60.9%) (χ<sup>2</sup> = 41.9; p < 0.001). CMCs had a higher proportion of centrally located hotspots (16.7%). These findings suggest that pathologists should focus on peripheral tumour regions when assessing MC in cMCTs and melanomas. Both central and peripheral regions should be considered in CMCs, while a more extensive, comprehensive evaluation may be required in STSs. The observed association between tumour histotype and proliferation pattern likely reflects inherent biological differences among the tumour types studied.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary and comparative oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary and comparative oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/vco.70019\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary and comparative oncology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vco.70019","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Analysis of Ki67 Density Maps Reveals Variation of Spatial Proliferation Patterns in Different Canine Neoplasms.
Mitotic count (MC) is a well-established prognostic factor in many canine malignancies. While standardisation efforts have improved inter-pathologist agreement regarding the morphology of mitotic figures and the size of the counting area, the selection of the tumour region for MC assessment remains to be standardised. This study aimed to evaluate the spatial distribution of the most proliferative areas in selected canine tumour types, using Ki67 immunohistochemistry, to identify optimal candidate regions for MC assessment. Tumour types analysed included melanomas, cutaneous mast cell tumours (cMCT), canine mammary carcinomas (CMC) and soft tissue sarcomas (STS). Using image analysis, Ki67 density maps were generated from digital slides and classified according to their distribution pattern (focal/multifocal or diffuse) and location within the tumour (central, peripheral or scattered). A total of 202 cases were included: 43 melanomas, 30 cMCTs, 42 CMCs and 87 cSTSs. The vast majority of tumours (92.6%) exhibited a multifocal hotspot distribution. Peripheral hotspot localisation was predominant in 55% of cases, particularly in cMCTs (73.3%) and melanomas (76.7%). In contrast, cSTSs more frequently showed a scattered hotspot pattern (60.9%) (χ2 = 41.9; p < 0.001). CMCs had a higher proportion of centrally located hotspots (16.7%). These findings suggest that pathologists should focus on peripheral tumour regions when assessing MC in cMCTs and melanomas. Both central and peripheral regions should be considered in CMCs, while a more extensive, comprehensive evaluation may be required in STSs. The observed association between tumour histotype and proliferation pattern likely reflects inherent biological differences among the tumour types studied.
期刊介绍:
Veterinary and Comparative Oncology (VCO) is an international, peer-reviewed journal integrating clinical and scientific information from a variety of related disciplines and from worldwide sources for all veterinary oncologists and cancer researchers concerned with aetiology, diagnosis and clinical course of cancer in domestic animals and its prevention. With the ultimate aim of diminishing suffering from cancer, the journal supports the transfer of knowledge in all aspects of veterinary oncology, from the application of new laboratory technology to cancer prevention, early detection, diagnosis and therapy. In addition to original articles, the journal publishes solicited editorials, review articles, commentary, correspondence and abstracts from the published literature. Accordingly, studies describing laboratory work performed exclusively in purpose-bred domestic animals (e.g. dogs, cats, horses) will not be considered.