抗血小板和原生动静脉瘘功能障碍。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Ioanna Pouliopoulou, Stefanos Roumeliotis, Konstantinos Leivaditis, Vangelis Bontinis, Alkis Bontinis, Theodora Chatzimpalasi, Vassilios Liakopoulos
{"title":"抗血小板和原生动静脉瘘功能障碍。","authors":"Ioanna Pouliopoulou, Stefanos Roumeliotis, Konstantinos Leivaditis, Vangelis Bontinis, Alkis Bontinis, Theodora Chatzimpalasi, Vassilios Liakopoulos","doi":"10.1024/0301-1526/a001225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> We investigated the safety and efficacy of antiplatelet therapy in preventing native arteriovenous fistula (AVF) dysfunction. <i>Patients and methods:</i> A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effects of antiplatelet therapy following native AVF creation were eligible for inclusion. The primary endpoint was AVF primary patency. Secondary endpoints included AVF maturation, abandonment, and overall bleeding. <i>Results:</i> Twelve RCTs, comprising 2,491 patients, were incorporated in the analysis. The included studies assessed aspirin, clopidogrel, ticlopidine, and dypiridamole across various dosing regimens. The postoperative administration of antiplatelets, regardless of the specific drug or dose, was associated with improved AVF primary patency compared to controls or placebo, odds ratio (OR) 2.28 (95% CI: 1.42-3.65). Subgroup analysis showed no significant differences for aspirin 100mg daily or clopidogrel 75mg daily compared to controls/placebo, with ORs of 1.08 (95% CI: 0.76-1.54) and 2.16 (95% CI: 0.95-4.91), respectively. In contrast, ticlopidine 250mg twice daily significantly improved patency, OR 3.48 (95% CI: 1.46-8.26). Additionally non-statistically significant differences were identified between the antiplatelet and control/placebo groups in terms of maturation, OR 1.58 (95% CI: 0.81-3.09), AVF abandonment, risk ratio (RR) 0.93 (95% CI: 0.58-1.50), or overall bleeding RR 1.18 (95% CI: 0.77-1.81). Finally, meta-regression analysis of the antiplatelet groups pooled estimates revealed a negative association between maturation and follow-up duration (β =-0.1235, p<.01), and treatment duration and abandonment outcomes (β =-0.065, p<.01). <i>Conclusions:</i> This review demonstrated the safety and efficacy of antiplatelet therapy in preserving AVF patency, with ticlopidine and clopidogrel emerging as the primary contributors to this outcome. These findings suggest the potentially beneficial role of adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor antagonists in maintaining AVF patency.</p>","PeriodicalId":23528,"journal":{"name":"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antiplatelets and native arteriovenous fistula dysfunction.\",\"authors\":\"Ioanna Pouliopoulou, Stefanos Roumeliotis, Konstantinos Leivaditis, Vangelis Bontinis, Alkis Bontinis, Theodora Chatzimpalasi, Vassilios Liakopoulos\",\"doi\":\"10.1024/0301-1526/a001225\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> We investigated the safety and efficacy of antiplatelet therapy in preventing native arteriovenous fistula (AVF) dysfunction. <i>Patients and methods:</i> A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effects of antiplatelet therapy following native AVF creation were eligible for inclusion. The primary endpoint was AVF primary patency. Secondary endpoints included AVF maturation, abandonment, and overall bleeding. <i>Results:</i> Twelve RCTs, comprising 2,491 patients, were incorporated in the analysis. The included studies assessed aspirin, clopidogrel, ticlopidine, and dypiridamole across various dosing regimens. The postoperative administration of antiplatelets, regardless of the specific drug or dose, was associated with improved AVF primary patency compared to controls or placebo, odds ratio (OR) 2.28 (95% CI: 1.42-3.65). Subgroup analysis showed no significant differences for aspirin 100mg daily or clopidogrel 75mg daily compared to controls/placebo, with ORs of 1.08 (95% CI: 0.76-1.54) and 2.16 (95% CI: 0.95-4.91), respectively. In contrast, ticlopidine 250mg twice daily significantly improved patency, OR 3.48 (95% CI: 1.46-8.26). Additionally non-statistically significant differences were identified between the antiplatelet and control/placebo groups in terms of maturation, OR 1.58 (95% CI: 0.81-3.09), AVF abandonment, risk ratio (RR) 0.93 (95% CI: 0.58-1.50), or overall bleeding RR 1.18 (95% CI: 0.77-1.81). Finally, meta-regression analysis of the antiplatelet groups pooled estimates revealed a negative association between maturation and follow-up duration (β =-0.1235, p<.01), and treatment duration and abandonment outcomes (β =-0.065, p<.01). <i>Conclusions:</i> This review demonstrated the safety and efficacy of antiplatelet therapy in preserving AVF patency, with ticlopidine and clopidogrel emerging as the primary contributors to this outcome. These findings suggest the potentially beneficial role of adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor antagonists in maintaining AVF patency.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526/a001225\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526/a001225","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:我们研究抗血小板治疗预防先天性动静脉瘘(AVF)功能障碍的安全性和有效性。患者和方法:根据PRISMA 2020指南进行系统评价。评估天然AVF产生后抗血小板治疗效果的随机对照试验(rct)符合纳入条件。主要终点为AVF原发通畅。次要终点包括AVF成熟、放弃和总出血。结果:12项随机对照试验,包括2491例患者纳入分析。纳入的研究评估了阿司匹林、氯吡格雷、噻氯匹定和双吡达摩在不同给药方案中的作用。与对照组或安慰剂相比,术后给予抗血小板药物,无论特定药物或剂量如何,与改善AVF原发性通畅相关,优势比(or)为2.28 (95% CI: 1.42-3.65)。亚组分析显示,与对照组/安慰剂相比,阿司匹林100mg /天或氯吡格雷75mg /天无显著差异,or分别为1.08 (95% CI: 0.76-1.54)和2.16 (95% CI: 0.95-4.91)。相反,噻氯匹定250mg每日两次显著改善通畅,OR为3.48 (95% CI: 1.46-8.26)。此外,抗血小板组和对照组/安慰剂组在成熟度方面存在无统计学意义的差异,OR为1.58 (95% CI: 0.81-3.09), AVF放弃,风险比(RR)为0.93 (95% CI: 0.58-1.50),总出血RR为1.18 (95% CI: 0.77-1.81)。最后,抗血小板组的荟萃回归分析显示成熟度和随访时间之间呈负相关(β =-0.1235)。结论:本综述证明了抗血小板治疗在保持AVF通畅方面的安全性和有效性,噻氯匹定和氯吡格雷是这一结果的主要影响因素。这些发现提示二磷酸腺苷(ADP)受体拮抗剂在维持AVF通畅方面的潜在有益作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Antiplatelets and native arteriovenous fistula dysfunction.

Background: We investigated the safety and efficacy of antiplatelet therapy in preventing native arteriovenous fistula (AVF) dysfunction. Patients and methods: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effects of antiplatelet therapy following native AVF creation were eligible for inclusion. The primary endpoint was AVF primary patency. Secondary endpoints included AVF maturation, abandonment, and overall bleeding. Results: Twelve RCTs, comprising 2,491 patients, were incorporated in the analysis. The included studies assessed aspirin, clopidogrel, ticlopidine, and dypiridamole across various dosing regimens. The postoperative administration of antiplatelets, regardless of the specific drug or dose, was associated with improved AVF primary patency compared to controls or placebo, odds ratio (OR) 2.28 (95% CI: 1.42-3.65). Subgroup analysis showed no significant differences for aspirin 100mg daily or clopidogrel 75mg daily compared to controls/placebo, with ORs of 1.08 (95% CI: 0.76-1.54) and 2.16 (95% CI: 0.95-4.91), respectively. In contrast, ticlopidine 250mg twice daily significantly improved patency, OR 3.48 (95% CI: 1.46-8.26). Additionally non-statistically significant differences were identified between the antiplatelet and control/placebo groups in terms of maturation, OR 1.58 (95% CI: 0.81-3.09), AVF abandonment, risk ratio (RR) 0.93 (95% CI: 0.58-1.50), or overall bleeding RR 1.18 (95% CI: 0.77-1.81). Finally, meta-regression analysis of the antiplatelet groups pooled estimates revealed a negative association between maturation and follow-up duration (β =-0.1235, p<.01), and treatment duration and abandonment outcomes (β =-0.065, p<.01). Conclusions: This review demonstrated the safety and efficacy of antiplatelet therapy in preserving AVF patency, with ticlopidine and clopidogrel emerging as the primary contributors to this outcome. These findings suggest the potentially beneficial role of adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor antagonists in maintaining AVF patency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
61
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Vasa is the European journal of vascular medicine. It is the official organ of the German, Swiss, and Slovenian Societies of Angiology. The journal publishes original research articles, case reports and reviews on vascular biology, epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, medical treatment and interventions for diseases of the arterial circulation, in the field of phlebology and lymphology including the microcirculation, except the cardiac circulation. Vasa combines basic science with clinical medicine making it relevant to all physicians interested in the whole vascular field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信