{"title":"梗阻性尿石症内镜治疗后肾造口管拔除时机及其与结石相关发病率的关系:一项回顾性队列研究","authors":"Kemal Kayar, Ridvan Kayar, Recep Cikrikci, Bugrahan Buhur Ozdemir, Cagatay Tosun, Metin Ishak Ozturk, Omer Ergin Yucebas","doi":"10.1007/s00240-025-01840-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate the impact of nephrostomy tube removal timing on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing definitive stone surgery after percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) placement for obstructive urolithiasis. We retrospectively analyzed 159 patients who underwent PCN followed by endoscopic stone surgery between January 2021 and June 2025. Patients were categorized into two groups based on nephrostomy tube removal timing: intraoperative removal (Group 1) and postoperative day 1 removal (Group 2). Demographic data, perioperative outcomes, Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3 complications, postoperative fever, and length of hospital stay were compared. Univariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of major complications and fever; however, a multivariable analysis to control for potential confounders was precluded by the low event rate. Group 1 (n = 95) and Group 2 (n = 64) were similar in baseline characteristics. Postoperative fever (1.1% vs. 7.8%, p = 0.028) and Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3 complications (1.1% vs. 15.6%, p < 0.001) were significantly lower in Group 1. Median hospital stay was also shorter (12 [9-15] vs. 15 [11-19] days, p = 0.008). Intraoperative tube removal was associated with significantly lower odds of major complications (OR: 17.41, 95% CI: 2.17-139.71, p = 0.007) and fever (OR: 7.97, 95% CI: 0.91-69.88, p = 0.061). In patients undergoing definitive stone surgery after PCN placement, intraoperative nephrostomy tube removal is associated with lower complication and fever rates and a shorter hospital stay. This approach may be a safe and preferable option in selected patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23411,"journal":{"name":"Urolithiasis","volume":"53 1","pages":"165"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Timing of nephrostomy tube removal and its association with stone-related morbidity following endoscopic management of obstructive urolithiasis: a retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Kemal Kayar, Ridvan Kayar, Recep Cikrikci, Bugrahan Buhur Ozdemir, Cagatay Tosun, Metin Ishak Ozturk, Omer Ergin Yucebas\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00240-025-01840-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate the impact of nephrostomy tube removal timing on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing definitive stone surgery after percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) placement for obstructive urolithiasis. We retrospectively analyzed 159 patients who underwent PCN followed by endoscopic stone surgery between January 2021 and June 2025. Patients were categorized into two groups based on nephrostomy tube removal timing: intraoperative removal (Group 1) and postoperative day 1 removal (Group 2). Demographic data, perioperative outcomes, Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3 complications, postoperative fever, and length of hospital stay were compared. Univariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of major complications and fever; however, a multivariable analysis to control for potential confounders was precluded by the low event rate. Group 1 (n = 95) and Group 2 (n = 64) were similar in baseline characteristics. Postoperative fever (1.1% vs. 7.8%, p = 0.028) and Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3 complications (1.1% vs. 15.6%, p < 0.001) were significantly lower in Group 1. Median hospital stay was also shorter (12 [9-15] vs. 15 [11-19] days, p = 0.008). Intraoperative tube removal was associated with significantly lower odds of major complications (OR: 17.41, 95% CI: 2.17-139.71, p = 0.007) and fever (OR: 7.97, 95% CI: 0.91-69.88, p = 0.061). In patients undergoing definitive stone surgery after PCN placement, intraoperative nephrostomy tube removal is associated with lower complication and fever rates and a shorter hospital stay. This approach may be a safe and preferable option in selected patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urolithiasis\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"165\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urolithiasis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-025-01840-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urolithiasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-025-01840-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究旨在评估经皮肾造口术(PCN)置管后肾造口管取出时间对梗阻性尿石症患者行最终结石手术的影响。我们回顾性分析了在2021年1月至2025年6月期间接受PCN和内窥镜结石手术的159例患者。根据取管时间将患者分为术中取管组(1组)和术后第1天取管组(2组)。比较人口学资料、围手术期结局、Clavien-Dindo分级≥3级并发症、术后发热和住院时间。采用单变量logistic回归分析确定主要并发症和发热的预测因素;然而,由于事件发生率低,无法进行多变量分析以控制潜在的混杂因素。组1 (n = 95)和组2 (n = 64)基线特征相似。术后发热(1.1% vs. 7.8%, p = 0.028)和Clavien-Dindo分级≥3级并发症(1.1% vs. 15.6%, p = 0.028)
Timing of nephrostomy tube removal and its association with stone-related morbidity following endoscopic management of obstructive urolithiasis: a retrospective cohort study.
This study aimed to evaluate the impact of nephrostomy tube removal timing on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing definitive stone surgery after percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) placement for obstructive urolithiasis. We retrospectively analyzed 159 patients who underwent PCN followed by endoscopic stone surgery between January 2021 and June 2025. Patients were categorized into two groups based on nephrostomy tube removal timing: intraoperative removal (Group 1) and postoperative day 1 removal (Group 2). Demographic data, perioperative outcomes, Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3 complications, postoperative fever, and length of hospital stay were compared. Univariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of major complications and fever; however, a multivariable analysis to control for potential confounders was precluded by the low event rate. Group 1 (n = 95) and Group 2 (n = 64) were similar in baseline characteristics. Postoperative fever (1.1% vs. 7.8%, p = 0.028) and Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3 complications (1.1% vs. 15.6%, p < 0.001) were significantly lower in Group 1. Median hospital stay was also shorter (12 [9-15] vs. 15 [11-19] days, p = 0.008). Intraoperative tube removal was associated with significantly lower odds of major complications (OR: 17.41, 95% CI: 2.17-139.71, p = 0.007) and fever (OR: 7.97, 95% CI: 0.91-69.88, p = 0.061). In patients undergoing definitive stone surgery after PCN placement, intraoperative nephrostomy tube removal is associated with lower complication and fever rates and a shorter hospital stay. This approach may be a safe and preferable option in selected patients.
期刊介绍:
Official Journal of the International Urolithiasis Society
The journal aims to publish original articles in the fields of clinical and experimental investigation only within the sphere of urolithiasis and its related areas of research. The journal covers all aspects of urolithiasis research including the diagnosis, epidemiology, pathogenesis, genetics, clinical biochemistry, open and non-invasive surgical intervention, nephrological investigation, chemistry and prophylaxis of the disorder. The Editor welcomes contributions on topics of interest to urologists, nephrologists, radiologists, clinical biochemists, epidemiologists, nutritionists, basic scientists and nurses working in that field.
Contributions may be submitted as full-length articles or as rapid communications in the form of Letters to the Editor. Articles should be original and should contain important new findings from carefully conducted studies designed to produce statistically significant data. Please note that we no longer publish articles classified as Case Reports. Editorials and review articles may be published by invitation from the Editorial Board. All submissions are peer-reviewed. Through an electronic system for the submission and review of manuscripts, the Editor and Associate Editors aim to make publication accessible as quickly as possible to a large number of readers throughout the world.