电化学处理混合阳极氧化涂料废水的多元方法研究。

IF 1.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Oruc Kaan Turk, Tugce Tarhan Turk, Senem Yazici Guvenc, Mehmet Cakmakci
{"title":"电化学处理混合阳极氧化涂料废水的多元方法研究。","authors":"Oruc Kaan Turk, Tugce Tarhan Turk, Senem Yazici Guvenc, Mehmet Cakmakci","doi":"10.1002/wer.70166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This research examined the treatment of mixed wastewater generated by the anodizing coating industry through electrocoagulation (EC) and electrooxidation (EO) processes. Key operational parameters, initial pH, applied current, and electrolysis time, were systematically varied to optimize contaminant removal. Process optimization was conducted using the Box-Behnken design (BBD), and the statistical validity of the model fit was assessed via analysis of variance (ANOVA). The responses for the EC and EO processes were chemical oxygen demand (COD), aluminum (Al), and sulfate removal efficiencies. The correlation coefficients (R<sup>2</sup>) for all model responses exceeded 0.95, demonstrating a strong agreement between predicted and observed values. Validation experiments confirmed high pollutant removal efficiencies, with COD removal rates of 94.5% and 90.8%, Al removal rates of 98.5% and 92.0%, and sulfate removal rates of 85.0% and 72.0% for the EC and EO processes, respectively. Although both procedures successfully accomplished effective pollutant removal, the EO method did not meet the discharge standards for the sewerage system, particularly in relation to sulfate concentration These findings highlight the superior efficacy of the EC process in sulfate removal, particularly for mixed wastewater from the anodizing coating industry.</p>","PeriodicalId":23621,"journal":{"name":"Water Environment Research","volume":"97 9","pages":"e70166"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Multivariate Approach for the Treatment of Mixed Anodizing Coating Wastewater by Electrochemical Processes.\",\"authors\":\"Oruc Kaan Turk, Tugce Tarhan Turk, Senem Yazici Guvenc, Mehmet Cakmakci\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/wer.70166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This research examined the treatment of mixed wastewater generated by the anodizing coating industry through electrocoagulation (EC) and electrooxidation (EO) processes. Key operational parameters, initial pH, applied current, and electrolysis time, were systematically varied to optimize contaminant removal. Process optimization was conducted using the Box-Behnken design (BBD), and the statistical validity of the model fit was assessed via analysis of variance (ANOVA). The responses for the EC and EO processes were chemical oxygen demand (COD), aluminum (Al), and sulfate removal efficiencies. The correlation coefficients (R<sup>2</sup>) for all model responses exceeded 0.95, demonstrating a strong agreement between predicted and observed values. Validation experiments confirmed high pollutant removal efficiencies, with COD removal rates of 94.5% and 90.8%, Al removal rates of 98.5% and 92.0%, and sulfate removal rates of 85.0% and 72.0% for the EC and EO processes, respectively. Although both procedures successfully accomplished effective pollutant removal, the EO method did not meet the discharge standards for the sewerage system, particularly in relation to sulfate concentration These findings highlight the superior efficacy of the EC process in sulfate removal, particularly for mixed wastewater from the anodizing coating industry.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water Environment Research\",\"volume\":\"97 9\",\"pages\":\"e70166\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water Environment Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.70166\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Environment Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.70166","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究了电絮凝(EC)和电氧化(EO)工艺处理阳极氧化涂料工业产生的混合废水。系统地改变关键操作参数,初始pH值,施加电流和电解时间,以优化污染物去除。采用Box-Behnken设计(BBD)进行工艺优化,并通过方差分析(ANOVA)评估模型拟合的统计效度。对EC和EO工艺的响应是化学需氧量(COD)、铝(Al)和硫酸盐去除效率。所有模型响应的相关系数(R2)均超过0.95,表明预测值与实测值之间具有很强的一致性。验证实验结果表明,EC和EO工艺的COD去除率分别为94.5%和90.8%,Al去除率分别为98.5%和92.0%,硫酸盐去除率分别为85.0%和72.0%。虽然这两种方法都成功地实现了有效的污染物去除,但EO方法不符合污水系统的排放标准,特别是在硫酸盐浓度方面。这些研究结果突出了EC工艺在硫酸盐去除方面的优越效果,特别是对于来自阳极氧化涂层工业的混合废水。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Multivariate Approach for the Treatment of Mixed Anodizing Coating Wastewater by Electrochemical Processes.

This research examined the treatment of mixed wastewater generated by the anodizing coating industry through electrocoagulation (EC) and electrooxidation (EO) processes. Key operational parameters, initial pH, applied current, and electrolysis time, were systematically varied to optimize contaminant removal. Process optimization was conducted using the Box-Behnken design (BBD), and the statistical validity of the model fit was assessed via analysis of variance (ANOVA). The responses for the EC and EO processes were chemical oxygen demand (COD), aluminum (Al), and sulfate removal efficiencies. The correlation coefficients (R2) for all model responses exceeded 0.95, demonstrating a strong agreement between predicted and observed values. Validation experiments confirmed high pollutant removal efficiencies, with COD removal rates of 94.5% and 90.8%, Al removal rates of 98.5% and 92.0%, and sulfate removal rates of 85.0% and 72.0% for the EC and EO processes, respectively. Although both procedures successfully accomplished effective pollutant removal, the EO method did not meet the discharge standards for the sewerage system, particularly in relation to sulfate concentration These findings highlight the superior efficacy of the EC process in sulfate removal, particularly for mixed wastewater from the anodizing coating industry.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Water Environment Research
Water Environment Research 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
138
审稿时长
11 months
期刊介绍: Published since 1928, Water Environment Research (WER) is an international multidisciplinary water resource management journal for the dissemination of fundamental and applied research in all scientific and technical areas related to water quality and resource recovery. WER''s goal is to foster communication and interdisciplinary research between water sciences and related fields such as environmental toxicology, agriculture, public and occupational health, microbiology, and ecology. In addition to original research articles, short communications, case studies, reviews, and perspectives are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信