Alexandra Williams, Ebony Schoenfeld, Esther Callcott, Randi Rotne
{"title":"优化学生效果:模拟模型与超声识别犬肢体植物异物两种教学方法的比较","authors":"Alexandra Williams, Ebony Schoenfeld, Esther Callcott, Randi Rotne","doi":"10.1111/vru.70073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Musculoskeletal ultrasonography is an underutilized skill within the veterinary industry. It requires practice and repetition to improve confidence and competence. In a clinic, ultrasonography is often used to identify grass seeds in patients; however, its teaching within the veterinary curriculum is limited. This study investigated the use of simulation models using two different teaching methods to improve undergraduate student outcomes in identifying vegetal foreign bodies (VFB). Forelimb models, containing wild oaten grass seeds (Avena fatua) in one of three locations, were used as ultrasonographic teaching aids. Fourth-year undergraduate veterinary science students (n = 38) were randomly assigned a limb and taught an ultrasound protocol. The trial group (n = 19) received video instructions with a demonstration, whilst the control group (n = 19) received written instructions only. All participants completed a pre- and post- participation survey and were anonymously assessed on their ability to locate the grass seed. Participants provided with both the video and written instructions (trial group) were 1.92 times more likely to identify the VFB within the simulation model when compared with the control group, with 53% identifying the VFB (p = .0327). All students agreed they would consider using ultrasonography in the future to identify canine VFBs. The outcomes of this study suggest that the use of simulation models in teaching is beneficial and that visual and verbal communication significantly improved students' ability to identify VFB compared with written instruction alone in a consequence-free learning environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":23581,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound","volume":"66 5","pages":"e70073"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12368255/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing Student Outcomes: A Comparison of Two Teaching Methods for Identifying Vegetal Foreign Bodies in Canine Limbs Using Simulation Models and Ultrasound.\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra Williams, Ebony Schoenfeld, Esther Callcott, Randi Rotne\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/vru.70073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Musculoskeletal ultrasonography is an underutilized skill within the veterinary industry. It requires practice and repetition to improve confidence and competence. In a clinic, ultrasonography is often used to identify grass seeds in patients; however, its teaching within the veterinary curriculum is limited. This study investigated the use of simulation models using two different teaching methods to improve undergraduate student outcomes in identifying vegetal foreign bodies (VFB). Forelimb models, containing wild oaten grass seeds (Avena fatua) in one of three locations, were used as ultrasonographic teaching aids. Fourth-year undergraduate veterinary science students (n = 38) were randomly assigned a limb and taught an ultrasound protocol. The trial group (n = 19) received video instructions with a demonstration, whilst the control group (n = 19) received written instructions only. All participants completed a pre- and post- participation survey and were anonymously assessed on their ability to locate the grass seed. Participants provided with both the video and written instructions (trial group) were 1.92 times more likely to identify the VFB within the simulation model when compared with the control group, with 53% identifying the VFB (p = .0327). All students agreed they would consider using ultrasonography in the future to identify canine VFBs. The outcomes of this study suggest that the use of simulation models in teaching is beneficial and that visual and verbal communication significantly improved students' ability to identify VFB compared with written instruction alone in a consequence-free learning environment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23581,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound\",\"volume\":\"66 5\",\"pages\":\"e70073\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12368255/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/vru.70073\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vru.70073","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Optimizing Student Outcomes: A Comparison of Two Teaching Methods for Identifying Vegetal Foreign Bodies in Canine Limbs Using Simulation Models and Ultrasound.
Musculoskeletal ultrasonography is an underutilized skill within the veterinary industry. It requires practice and repetition to improve confidence and competence. In a clinic, ultrasonography is often used to identify grass seeds in patients; however, its teaching within the veterinary curriculum is limited. This study investigated the use of simulation models using two different teaching methods to improve undergraduate student outcomes in identifying vegetal foreign bodies (VFB). Forelimb models, containing wild oaten grass seeds (Avena fatua) in one of three locations, were used as ultrasonographic teaching aids. Fourth-year undergraduate veterinary science students (n = 38) were randomly assigned a limb and taught an ultrasound protocol. The trial group (n = 19) received video instructions with a demonstration, whilst the control group (n = 19) received written instructions only. All participants completed a pre- and post- participation survey and were anonymously assessed on their ability to locate the grass seed. Participants provided with both the video and written instructions (trial group) were 1.92 times more likely to identify the VFB within the simulation model when compared with the control group, with 53% identifying the VFB (p = .0327). All students agreed they would consider using ultrasonography in the future to identify canine VFBs. The outcomes of this study suggest that the use of simulation models in teaching is beneficial and that visual and verbal communication significantly improved students' ability to identify VFB compared with written instruction alone in a consequence-free learning environment.
期刊介绍:
Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound is a bimonthly, international, peer-reviewed, research journal devoted to the fields of veterinary diagnostic imaging and radiation oncology. Established in 1958, it is owned by the American College of Veterinary Radiology and is also the official journal for six affiliate veterinary organizations. Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound is represented on the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, World Association of Medical Editors, and Committee on Publication Ethics.
The mission of Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound is to serve as a leading resource for high quality articles that advance scientific knowledge and standards of clinical practice in the areas of veterinary diagnostic radiology, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, nuclear imaging, radiation oncology, and interventional radiology. Manuscript types include original investigations, imaging diagnosis reports, review articles, editorials and letters to the Editor. Acceptance criteria include originality, significance, quality, reader interest, composition and adherence to author guidelines.