Hye-Jeong Sin, Ji-Young Bae, Sun-A Cho, Minseok Choi, Changwan Ha, Chang Eon Park, Jeong-Ja Oh, Susun An, Bae-Hwan Kim
{"title":"一种新改进的化学皮肤致敏试验方法——分光光度法直接肽反应性测定法的验证研究。","authors":"Hye-Jeong Sin, Ji-Young Bae, Sun-A Cho, Minseok Choi, Changwan Ha, Chang Eon Park, Jeong-Ja Oh, Susun An, Bae-Hwan Kim","doi":"10.1007/s43188-025-00287-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study was conducted to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of the Spectro-DPRA, an enhanced method for the OECD TG 442C (direct peptide reactivity assay, DPRA), serving as an alternative to animal testing for skin sensitization. The validation of Spectro-DPRA was executed across four participating laboratories (Lab 1, Lab 2, Lab 3, and Lab 4, the latter only participating in the proficiency test) adhering to GLP principles. It covered transferability, proficiency, within laboratory and between laboratory reproducibility tests, and a predictive capacity test using 40 additional substances. In tests with 10 proficiency substances, results from all participating laboratories fell within the respective reference ranges for 8 of the 10 substances for each peptide. The within laboratory reproducibility for 12 test substances demonstrated success rates of 83.3% for both Lab 1 and Lab 3, and 100% for Lab 2. The between laboratory reproducibility for 20 test substances showed an 85% concordance rate. The predictive capacity for these substances did not align with the test method similarity criteria stipulated in the OECD Series on Testing and Assessment No. 303 (performance standards for the assessment of proposed similar or modified in vitro skin sensitisation DPRA and ADRA test methods, OECD PS No.303), with accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity rates at 74.6%, 70.9%, and 81.4%, respectively. However, the predictive capacity for an additional 40 substances revealed high accuracy (85.2%), sensitivity (82.2%), and specificity (97.0%). Although the Spectro-DPRA did not completely conform to the OECD PS No.303 criteria for test method similarity, it showed high predictive accuracy of over 80% for the 40 additional substances, confirming its reliability as a test method for skin sensitization evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23181,"journal":{"name":"Toxicological Research","volume":"41 5","pages":"455-475"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12378800/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation study of spectrophotometric direct peptide reactivity assay (spectro-DPRA), a newly modified in chemico skin sensitization test method.\",\"authors\":\"Hye-Jeong Sin, Ji-Young Bae, Sun-A Cho, Minseok Choi, Changwan Ha, Chang Eon Park, Jeong-Ja Oh, Susun An, Bae-Hwan Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43188-025-00287-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study was conducted to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of the Spectro-DPRA, an enhanced method for the OECD TG 442C (direct peptide reactivity assay, DPRA), serving as an alternative to animal testing for skin sensitization. The validation of Spectro-DPRA was executed across four participating laboratories (Lab 1, Lab 2, Lab 3, and Lab 4, the latter only participating in the proficiency test) adhering to GLP principles. It covered transferability, proficiency, within laboratory and between laboratory reproducibility tests, and a predictive capacity test using 40 additional substances. In tests with 10 proficiency substances, results from all participating laboratories fell within the respective reference ranges for 8 of the 10 substances for each peptide. The within laboratory reproducibility for 12 test substances demonstrated success rates of 83.3% for both Lab 1 and Lab 3, and 100% for Lab 2. The between laboratory reproducibility for 20 test substances showed an 85% concordance rate. The predictive capacity for these substances did not align with the test method similarity criteria stipulated in the OECD Series on Testing and Assessment No. 303 (performance standards for the assessment of proposed similar or modified in vitro skin sensitisation DPRA and ADRA test methods, OECD PS No.303), with accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity rates at 74.6%, 70.9%, and 81.4%, respectively. However, the predictive capacity for an additional 40 substances revealed high accuracy (85.2%), sensitivity (82.2%), and specificity (97.0%). Although the Spectro-DPRA did not completely conform to the OECD PS No.303 criteria for test method similarity, it showed high predictive accuracy of over 80% for the 40 additional substances, confirming its reliability as a test method for skin sensitization evaluation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Toxicological Research\",\"volume\":\"41 5\",\"pages\":\"455-475\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12378800/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Toxicological Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43188-025-00287-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicological Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43188-025-00287-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validation study of spectrophotometric direct peptide reactivity assay (spectro-DPRA), a newly modified in chemico skin sensitization test method.
This study was conducted to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of the Spectro-DPRA, an enhanced method for the OECD TG 442C (direct peptide reactivity assay, DPRA), serving as an alternative to animal testing for skin sensitization. The validation of Spectro-DPRA was executed across four participating laboratories (Lab 1, Lab 2, Lab 3, and Lab 4, the latter only participating in the proficiency test) adhering to GLP principles. It covered transferability, proficiency, within laboratory and between laboratory reproducibility tests, and a predictive capacity test using 40 additional substances. In tests with 10 proficiency substances, results from all participating laboratories fell within the respective reference ranges for 8 of the 10 substances for each peptide. The within laboratory reproducibility for 12 test substances demonstrated success rates of 83.3% for both Lab 1 and Lab 3, and 100% for Lab 2. The between laboratory reproducibility for 20 test substances showed an 85% concordance rate. The predictive capacity for these substances did not align with the test method similarity criteria stipulated in the OECD Series on Testing and Assessment No. 303 (performance standards for the assessment of proposed similar or modified in vitro skin sensitisation DPRA and ADRA test methods, OECD PS No.303), with accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity rates at 74.6%, 70.9%, and 81.4%, respectively. However, the predictive capacity for an additional 40 substances revealed high accuracy (85.2%), sensitivity (82.2%), and specificity (97.0%). Although the Spectro-DPRA did not completely conform to the OECD PS No.303 criteria for test method similarity, it showed high predictive accuracy of over 80% for the 40 additional substances, confirming its reliability as a test method for skin sensitization evaluation.
期刊介绍:
Toxicological Research is the official journal of the Korean Society of Toxicology. The journal covers all areas of Toxicological Research of chemicals, drugs and environmental agents affecting human and animals, which in turn impact public health. The journal’s mission is to disseminate scientific and technical information on diverse areas of toxicological research. Contributions by toxicologists, molecular biologists, geneticists, biochemists, pharmacologists, clinical researchers and epidemiologists with a global view on public health through toxicological research are welcome. Emphasis will be given to articles providing an understanding of the toxicological mechanisms affecting animal, human and public health. In the case of research articles using natural extracts, detailed information with respect to the origin, extraction method, chemical profiles, and characterization of standard compounds to ensure the reproducible pharmacological activity should be provided.