Kazuki Majima, Masafumi Nozoe, Miho Yamamoto, Rio Ikeji, Shinichi Shimada
{"title":"卒中后衰弱指数对功能结局的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Kazuki Majima, Masafumi Nozoe, Miho Yamamoto, Rio Ikeji, Shinichi Shimada","doi":"10.1080/10749357.2025.2553589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The frailty index (FI) has been reported as a useful measure for assessing premorbid conditions in stroke patients; however, its significance in evaluating post-stroke status remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aims to clarify the role of FI as a tool for assessing post-stroke conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included stroke patients admitted to an acute-care hospital. The FI, based on the cumulative deficit model and comprising comorbidities, symptoms, and functional limitations, was assessed using 33 items at discharge from the acute-care hospital. The primary outcome was the mRS at three months post-onset. Multiple logistic regression was performed with poor functional outcomes as the dependent variable and mRS at discharge, FI at discharge, and both as explanatory variables. The cutoff value of FI for poor functional outcomes was also determined using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 241 patients with acute stroke were included in the final analysis. The median length of hospital stay was 14 days (IQR 9-20). In the adjusted model including both FI and mRS at discharge, FI at discharge was significantly associated with poor outcomes (aOR = 3.43, 95% CI = 1.66-7.09, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The cutoff value of FI for poor functional prognosis derived from the ROC curve was 0.288 (sensitivity 0.816, specificity 0.911).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicate that post-stroke FI is independently associated with poor outcomes. It is important to incorporate FI in addition to traditional assessment tools to predict post-stroke prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":23164,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of post-stroke frailty index on functional outcomes: a retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Kazuki Majima, Masafumi Nozoe, Miho Yamamoto, Rio Ikeji, Shinichi Shimada\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10749357.2025.2553589\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The frailty index (FI) has been reported as a useful measure for assessing premorbid conditions in stroke patients; however, its significance in evaluating post-stroke status remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aims to clarify the role of FI as a tool for assessing post-stroke conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included stroke patients admitted to an acute-care hospital. The FI, based on the cumulative deficit model and comprising comorbidities, symptoms, and functional limitations, was assessed using 33 items at discharge from the acute-care hospital. The primary outcome was the mRS at three months post-onset. Multiple logistic regression was performed with poor functional outcomes as the dependent variable and mRS at discharge, FI at discharge, and both as explanatory variables. The cutoff value of FI for poor functional outcomes was also determined using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 241 patients with acute stroke were included in the final analysis. The median length of hospital stay was 14 days (IQR 9-20). In the adjusted model including both FI and mRS at discharge, FI at discharge was significantly associated with poor outcomes (aOR = 3.43, 95% CI = 1.66-7.09, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The cutoff value of FI for poor functional prognosis derived from the ROC curve was 0.288 (sensitivity 0.816, specificity 0.911).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicate that post-stroke FI is independently associated with poor outcomes. It is important to incorporate FI in addition to traditional assessment tools to predict post-stroke prognosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2025.2553589\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2025.2553589","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:虚弱指数(FI)已被报道为评估卒中患者发病前状况的有用指标;然而,其在评估卒中后状态中的意义尚不清楚。目的:本研究旨在阐明FI作为评估脑卒中后状况的工具的作用。方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入急性护理医院收治的脑卒中患者。FI基于累积缺陷模型,包括合并症、症状和功能限制,在急性护理医院出院时使用33个项目进行评估。主要结果是发病后3个月的mRS。以不良功能结局作为因变量,出院时mRS和出院时FI作为解释变量,进行多重逻辑回归。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线确定功能不良预后的FI临界值。结果:共有241例急性脑卒中患者纳入最终分析。中位住院时间为14天(IQR 9-20)。在包括出院时FI和mRS的调整模型中,出院时FI与不良预后显著相关(aOR = 3.43, 95% CI = 1.66-7.09, p)。结论:我们的研究结果表明卒中后FI与不良预后独立相关。除了传统的评估工具外,将FI纳入预测脑卒中后预后是很重要的。
Impact of post-stroke frailty index on functional outcomes: a retrospective cohort study.
Background: The frailty index (FI) has been reported as a useful measure for assessing premorbid conditions in stroke patients; however, its significance in evaluating post-stroke status remains unclear.
Aims: This study aims to clarify the role of FI as a tool for assessing post-stroke conditions.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study included stroke patients admitted to an acute-care hospital. The FI, based on the cumulative deficit model and comprising comorbidities, symptoms, and functional limitations, was assessed using 33 items at discharge from the acute-care hospital. The primary outcome was the mRS at three months post-onset. Multiple logistic regression was performed with poor functional outcomes as the dependent variable and mRS at discharge, FI at discharge, and both as explanatory variables. The cutoff value of FI for poor functional outcomes was also determined using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
Results: A total of 241 patients with acute stroke were included in the final analysis. The median length of hospital stay was 14 days (IQR 9-20). In the adjusted model including both FI and mRS at discharge, FI at discharge was significantly associated with poor outcomes (aOR = 3.43, 95% CI = 1.66-7.09, p < 0.001). The cutoff value of FI for poor functional prognosis derived from the ROC curve was 0.288 (sensitivity 0.816, specificity 0.911).
Conclusions: Our findings indicate that post-stroke FI is independently associated with poor outcomes. It is important to incorporate FI in addition to traditional assessment tools to predict post-stroke prognosis.
期刊介绍:
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation is the leading journal devoted to the study and dissemination of interdisciplinary, evidence-based, clinical information related to stroke rehabilitation. The journal’s scope covers physical medicine and rehabilitation, neurology, neurorehabilitation, neural engineering and therapeutics, neuropsychology and cognition, optimization of the rehabilitation system, robotics and biomechanics, pain management, nursing, physical therapy, cardiopulmonary fitness, mobility, occupational therapy, speech pathology and communication. There is a particular focus on stroke recovery, improving rehabilitation outcomes, quality of life, activities of daily living, motor control, family and care givers, and community issues.
The journal reviews and reports clinical practices, clinical trials, state-of-the-art concepts, and new developments in stroke research and patient care. Both primary research papers, reviews of existing literature, and invited editorials, are included. Sharply-focused, single-issue topics, and the latest in clinical research, provide in-depth knowledge.