创伤剖腹手术切口负压伤口治疗及手术部位浅表感染的发生率。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Miles W Reese, Raymond Hogge, Brendan Roess, John Hepner, Robert Luke, Ishraq Kabir, Tuan Nguyen, Kristen Snyder, Julia Heaton, Ricardo Rendel, Michael Martyak
{"title":"创伤剖腹手术切口负压伤口治疗及手术部位浅表感染的发生率。","authors":"Miles W Reese, Raymond Hogge, Brendan Roess, John Hepner, Robert Luke, Ishraq Kabir, Tuan Nguyen, Kristen Snyder, Julia Heaton, Ricardo Rendel, Michael Martyak","doi":"10.1177/10962964251370931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objectives:</i></b> Investigate the relationship between incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) and the development of superficial surgical site infections (SSIs) and wound dehiscence. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A retrospective chart analysis was performed. Trauma patients between the ages of 18 and 89 years receiving an emergent exploratory laparotomy on admission between January 1, 2015, and March 31, 2022, were included. A multivariable analysis was performed. The primary and secondary outcomes were the development of superficial SSI and wound dehiscence, respectively, on the basis of the type of incision closure. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Two hundred forty-seven patients who met our criteria were analyzed. Of these, 135 patients were closed with staples plus iNPWT, and 112 patients were closed with only staples. The multivariable analysis found decreased odds of superficial SSI in patients who received staples plus iNPWT versus staples alone (odds ratio [OR] = 0.28, p = 0.019). The multivariable analysis found decreased odds of wound dehiscence in patients who received staples plus iNPWT versus staples alone (OR = 0.24, p = 0.001). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Our study revealed a statistically significant decreased odds of superficial SSI and wound dehiscence in patients who received staples plus iNPWT when compared with staples alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":22109,"journal":{"name":"Surgical infections","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Trauma Laparotomies and Rates of Superficial Surgical Site Infections.\",\"authors\":\"Miles W Reese, Raymond Hogge, Brendan Roess, John Hepner, Robert Luke, Ishraq Kabir, Tuan Nguyen, Kristen Snyder, Julia Heaton, Ricardo Rendel, Michael Martyak\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10962964251370931\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Objectives:</i></b> Investigate the relationship between incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) and the development of superficial surgical site infections (SSIs) and wound dehiscence. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A retrospective chart analysis was performed. Trauma patients between the ages of 18 and 89 years receiving an emergent exploratory laparotomy on admission between January 1, 2015, and March 31, 2022, were included. A multivariable analysis was performed. The primary and secondary outcomes were the development of superficial SSI and wound dehiscence, respectively, on the basis of the type of incision closure. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Two hundred forty-seven patients who met our criteria were analyzed. Of these, 135 patients were closed with staples plus iNPWT, and 112 patients were closed with only staples. The multivariable analysis found decreased odds of superficial SSI in patients who received staples plus iNPWT versus staples alone (odds ratio [OR] = 0.28, p = 0.019). The multivariable analysis found decreased odds of wound dehiscence in patients who received staples plus iNPWT versus staples alone (OR = 0.24, p = 0.001). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Our study revealed a statistically significant decreased odds of superficial SSI and wound dehiscence in patients who received staples plus iNPWT when compared with staples alone.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical infections\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical infections\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10962964251370931\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical infections","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10962964251370931","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨切口负压创面治疗(iNPWT)与手术部位浅表感染(ssi)及创面裂开的关系。方法:采用回顾性图表分析。纳入了2015年1月1日至2022年3月31日入院时接受急诊剖腹探查术的年龄在18岁至89岁之间的创伤患者。进行多变量分析。根据切口闭合方式的不同,主要和次要结局分别为浅表SSI的发生和创面裂开。结果:我们分析了符合标准的247例患者。其中,135例患者使用订书钉加iNPWT缝合,112例患者仅使用订书钉缝合。多变量分析发现,与单独使用固定钉相比,使用固定钉加iNPWT的患者发生浅表SSI的几率降低(优势比[OR] = 0.28, p = 0.019)。多变量分析发现,与单独使用订书钉相比,使用订书钉加iNPWT的患者伤口裂开的几率降低(OR = 0.24, p = 0.001)。结论:我们的研究显示,与单独使用订书钉相比,接受订书钉加iNPWT的患者发生浅表SSI和伤口裂开的几率显著降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Trauma Laparotomies and Rates of Superficial Surgical Site Infections.

Objectives: Investigate the relationship between incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) and the development of superficial surgical site infections (SSIs) and wound dehiscence. Methods: A retrospective chart analysis was performed. Trauma patients between the ages of 18 and 89 years receiving an emergent exploratory laparotomy on admission between January 1, 2015, and March 31, 2022, were included. A multivariable analysis was performed. The primary and secondary outcomes were the development of superficial SSI and wound dehiscence, respectively, on the basis of the type of incision closure. Results: Two hundred forty-seven patients who met our criteria were analyzed. Of these, 135 patients were closed with staples plus iNPWT, and 112 patients were closed with only staples. The multivariable analysis found decreased odds of superficial SSI in patients who received staples plus iNPWT versus staples alone (odds ratio [OR] = 0.28, p = 0.019). The multivariable analysis found decreased odds of wound dehiscence in patients who received staples plus iNPWT versus staples alone (OR = 0.24, p = 0.001). Conclusion: Our study revealed a statistically significant decreased odds of superficial SSI and wound dehiscence in patients who received staples plus iNPWT when compared with staples alone.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Surgical infections
Surgical infections INFECTIOUS DISEASES-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
127
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Infections provides comprehensive and authoritative information on the biology, prevention, and management of post-operative infections. Original articles cover the latest advancements, new therapeutic management strategies, and translational research that is being applied to improve clinical outcomes and successfully treat post-operative infections. Surgical Infections coverage includes: -Peritonitis and intra-abdominal infections- Surgical site infections- Pneumonia and other nosocomial infections- Cellular and humoral immunity- Biology of the host response- Organ dysfunction syndromes- Antibiotic use- Resistant and opportunistic pathogens- Epidemiology and prevention- The operating room environment- Diagnostic studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信