澳大利亚维多利亚州癌症患者获得姑息性放疗的旅行距离和潜在差异。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Maike Trommer, Piers Gillett, Fanny Franchini, Karen Trapani, Colin Hornby, Skye Abraham, Dishan Herath, Karla Gough, Keith Donohoe, Phillip Tran, Farshad Foroudi, Maarten IJzerman, Richard Khor
{"title":"澳大利亚维多利亚州癌症患者获得姑息性放疗的旅行距离和潜在差异。","authors":"Maike Trommer, Piers Gillett, Fanny Franchini, Karen Trapani, Colin Hornby, Skye Abraham, Dishan Herath, Karla Gough, Keith Donohoe, Phillip Tran, Farshad Foroudi, Maarten IJzerman, Richard Khor","doi":"10.1007/s00066-025-02418-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Palliative radiotherapy (PRT) is crucial for improving quality of life in patients with advanced-staged cancer. This large data analysis investigates the travel distances and potential disparities in PRT access especially focusing on the burden of excess travel for palliative cancer patients in Victoria, Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a state-wide linked dataset from the PRedicting the health economic IMPact of new and current Cancer Treatments (PRIMCAT) research program, we analysed the estimated road travel distance (ERTD) and potential excess travel distance (PETD) as well as received radiotherapy fractions for 29,807 PRT patients being treated from 2010-2019. We examined disparities by socioeconomic status (SEIFA) and remoteness (RA) of the residential area of PRT patients, and receiving treatment at a public or private centre.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average one-way ERTD for all PRT patients was 43 km, with variations based on SEIFA and RA. Patients in the lowest SEIFA quintile and those living in outer regional areas had the longest ERTD. Approximately 50% did not receive treatment at the closest facility, with a mean PETD of 27.9 km for private and 24.3 km for public facility patients. Fractionation patterns showed no significant reduction in the number of fractions with increased travel distance. Patients at private facilities received more fractions on average (8.49) compared to those at public facilities (5.91).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights potential disparities in PRT access in Victoria, with patients living in socioeconomically disadvantaged and remote regions facing longer travel distances and excess travel. These findings underscore the need for strategic referral practices and further research to optimise equitable access to PRT.</p>","PeriodicalId":21998,"journal":{"name":"Strahlentherapie und Onkologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Travel distance and potential disparities in palliative radiotherapy access for cancer patients in Victoria, Australia.\",\"authors\":\"Maike Trommer, Piers Gillett, Fanny Franchini, Karen Trapani, Colin Hornby, Skye Abraham, Dishan Herath, Karla Gough, Keith Donohoe, Phillip Tran, Farshad Foroudi, Maarten IJzerman, Richard Khor\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00066-025-02418-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Palliative radiotherapy (PRT) is crucial for improving quality of life in patients with advanced-staged cancer. This large data analysis investigates the travel distances and potential disparities in PRT access especially focusing on the burden of excess travel for palliative cancer patients in Victoria, Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a state-wide linked dataset from the PRedicting the health economic IMPact of new and current Cancer Treatments (PRIMCAT) research program, we analysed the estimated road travel distance (ERTD) and potential excess travel distance (PETD) as well as received radiotherapy fractions for 29,807 PRT patients being treated from 2010-2019. We examined disparities by socioeconomic status (SEIFA) and remoteness (RA) of the residential area of PRT patients, and receiving treatment at a public or private centre.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average one-way ERTD for all PRT patients was 43 km, with variations based on SEIFA and RA. Patients in the lowest SEIFA quintile and those living in outer regional areas had the longest ERTD. Approximately 50% did not receive treatment at the closest facility, with a mean PETD of 27.9 km for private and 24.3 km for public facility patients. Fractionation patterns showed no significant reduction in the number of fractions with increased travel distance. Patients at private facilities received more fractions on average (8.49) compared to those at public facilities (5.91).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights potential disparities in PRT access in Victoria, with patients living in socioeconomically disadvantaged and remote regions facing longer travel distances and excess travel. These findings underscore the need for strategic referral practices and further research to optimise equitable access to PRT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21998,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Strahlentherapie und Onkologie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Strahlentherapie und Onkologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-025-02418-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strahlentherapie und Onkologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-025-02418-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:姑息放疗(PRT)对于改善晚期癌症患者的生活质量至关重要。这项大数据分析调查了旅行距离和PRT获取的潜在差异,特别是关注澳大利亚维多利亚州姑息性癌症患者的过度旅行负担。方法:使用来自预测新癌症治疗和当前癌症治疗的健康经济影响(PRIMCAT)研究计划的全州关联数据集,我们分析了2010-2019年期间接受治疗的29,807名PRT患者的估计道路旅行距离(ERTD)和潜在超额旅行距离(PETD)以及接受放疗的分数。我们检查了PRT患者的社会经济地位(SEIFA)和居住地的偏远程度(RA),以及在公立或私立中心接受治疗的差异。结果:所有PRT患者的平均单向ERTD为43公里,基于SEIFA和RA的变化。SEIFA最低五分位数的患者和生活在外围地区的患者的ERTD最长。大约50%的患者没有在最近的医院接受治疗,私立医院患者的平均PETD为27.9公里,公立医院患者的平均PETD为24.3公里。随着旅行距离的增加,分馏模式的分数数量没有显著减少。私立医院患者的平均分数(8.49分)高于公立医院(5.91分)。结论:该研究突出了维多利亚州PRT获取的潜在差异,生活在社会经济不利和偏远地区的患者面临更长的旅行距离和超额旅行。这些发现强调需要战略性转诊做法和进一步研究,以优化公平获得PRT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Travel distance and potential disparities in palliative radiotherapy access for cancer patients in Victoria, Australia.

Background: Palliative radiotherapy (PRT) is crucial for improving quality of life in patients with advanced-staged cancer. This large data analysis investigates the travel distances and potential disparities in PRT access especially focusing on the burden of excess travel for palliative cancer patients in Victoria, Australia.

Methods: Using a state-wide linked dataset from the PRedicting the health economic IMPact of new and current Cancer Treatments (PRIMCAT) research program, we analysed the estimated road travel distance (ERTD) and potential excess travel distance (PETD) as well as received radiotherapy fractions for 29,807 PRT patients being treated from 2010-2019. We examined disparities by socioeconomic status (SEIFA) and remoteness (RA) of the residential area of PRT patients, and receiving treatment at a public or private centre.

Results: The average one-way ERTD for all PRT patients was 43 km, with variations based on SEIFA and RA. Patients in the lowest SEIFA quintile and those living in outer regional areas had the longest ERTD. Approximately 50% did not receive treatment at the closest facility, with a mean PETD of 27.9 km for private and 24.3 km for public facility patients. Fractionation patterns showed no significant reduction in the number of fractions with increased travel distance. Patients at private facilities received more fractions on average (8.49) compared to those at public facilities (5.91).

Conclusion: This study highlights potential disparities in PRT access in Victoria, with patients living in socioeconomically disadvantaged and remote regions facing longer travel distances and excess travel. These findings underscore the need for strategic referral practices and further research to optimise equitable access to PRT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
12.90%
发文量
141
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, published monthly, is a scientific journal that covers all aspects of oncology with focus on radiooncology, radiation biology and radiation physics. The articles are not only of interest to radiooncologists but to all physicians interested in oncology, to radiation biologists and radiation physicists. The journal publishes original articles, review articles and case studies that are peer-reviewed. It includes scientific short communications as well as a literature review with annotated articles that inform the reader on new developments in the various disciplines concerned and hence allow for a sound overview on the latest results in radiooncology research. Founded in 1912, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie is the oldest oncological journal in the world. Today, contributions are published in English and German. All articles have English summaries and legends. The journal is the official publication of several scientific radiooncological societies and publishes the relevant communications of these societies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信