Jay B Lusk, Bo Liu, Emily O'Brien, David Hasan, Gregg C Fonarow, Kevin Sheth, Lee H Schwamm, Ying Xian, Gregory W Albers, Jeffrey L Saver, Fan Li, Brian Mac Grory
{"title":"医院实施血管内取栓与急性脑卒中预后的健康公平。","authors":"Jay B Lusk, Bo Liu, Emily O'Brien, David Hasan, Gregg C Fonarow, Kevin Sheth, Lee H Schwamm, Ying Xian, Gregory W Albers, Jeffrey L Saver, Fan Li, Brian Mac Grory","doi":"10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.051312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The introduction of novel therapeutics into clinical practice could impact equity in health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective, observational cohort study based on the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke program of the American Heart Association. Two epochs were considered: January 2010 to December 2014 and January 2016 to December 2019. The primary exposure was the availability of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) at the hospital level defined by the degree of implementation of EVT (>10% change from pre-2015 to post-2015) after balancing key patient and hospital characteristics with overlap weighting. The coprimary end points were (1) the difference in in-hospital mortality for patients from counties with median income >$60 000 versus <$60 000 and (2) the difference in in-hospital mortality between Black and White patients. Secondary end points were differences in in-hospital mortality by sex, insurance status, county-level poverty, and county-level educational attainment. Exploratory end points were differences in ambulatory status at hospital discharge and a composite of in-hospital mortality/discharge to hospice across the above categories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 173 049 patients (median age, 75 years; 53.9% female) potentially eligible for EVT, 39 196 (22.7%) received EVT (7572 [10.0% of potentially eligible patients] between 2010 and 2014 and 31 624 [32.6% of potentially eligible patients] between 2016 and 2019). From 2010 to 2014, 1565 (20.7%) of patients and from 2016 to 2019, 5158 (16.3%) who received EVT died in hospital. Implementation of EVT was associated with decreased disparities in mortality rates for patients from counties with median inflation-adjusted income >$60 000 versus <$60 000 (absolute risk difference, 3.9% [95% CI, 0.53%-7.3%]). Implementation of EVT was not associated with changes in differences in in-hospital mortality by race, sex, county poverty rates, county educational attainment, or insurance status.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients with acute ischemic stroke who were potentially eligible for EVT, the implementation of EVT on a hospital level did not worsen health equity in any dimension (race/ethnicity, sex, or insurance status) and was associated with improvements in socioeconomic equity in acute ischemic stroke mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":21989,"journal":{"name":"Stroke","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12433677/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hospital Implementation of Endovascular Thrombectomy and Health Equity in Acute Stroke Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Jay B Lusk, Bo Liu, Emily O'Brien, David Hasan, Gregg C Fonarow, Kevin Sheth, Lee H Schwamm, Ying Xian, Gregory W Albers, Jeffrey L Saver, Fan Li, Brian Mac Grory\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.051312\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The introduction of novel therapeutics into clinical practice could impact equity in health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective, observational cohort study based on the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke program of the American Heart Association. Two epochs were considered: January 2010 to December 2014 and January 2016 to December 2019. The primary exposure was the availability of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) at the hospital level defined by the degree of implementation of EVT (>10% change from pre-2015 to post-2015) after balancing key patient and hospital characteristics with overlap weighting. The coprimary end points were (1) the difference in in-hospital mortality for patients from counties with median income >$60 000 versus <$60 000 and (2) the difference in in-hospital mortality between Black and White patients. Secondary end points were differences in in-hospital mortality by sex, insurance status, county-level poverty, and county-level educational attainment. Exploratory end points were differences in ambulatory status at hospital discharge and a composite of in-hospital mortality/discharge to hospice across the above categories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 173 049 patients (median age, 75 years; 53.9% female) potentially eligible for EVT, 39 196 (22.7%) received EVT (7572 [10.0% of potentially eligible patients] between 2010 and 2014 and 31 624 [32.6% of potentially eligible patients] between 2016 and 2019). From 2010 to 2014, 1565 (20.7%) of patients and from 2016 to 2019, 5158 (16.3%) who received EVT died in hospital. Implementation of EVT was associated with decreased disparities in mortality rates for patients from counties with median inflation-adjusted income >$60 000 versus <$60 000 (absolute risk difference, 3.9% [95% CI, 0.53%-7.3%]). Implementation of EVT was not associated with changes in differences in in-hospital mortality by race, sex, county poverty rates, county educational attainment, or insurance status.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients with acute ischemic stroke who were potentially eligible for EVT, the implementation of EVT on a hospital level did not worsen health equity in any dimension (race/ethnicity, sex, or insurance status) and was associated with improvements in socioeconomic equity in acute ischemic stroke mortality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stroke\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12433677/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stroke\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.051312\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.051312","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Hospital Implementation of Endovascular Thrombectomy and Health Equity in Acute Stroke Outcomes.
Background: The introduction of novel therapeutics into clinical practice could impact equity in health outcomes.
Methods: This was a retrospective, observational cohort study based on the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke program of the American Heart Association. Two epochs were considered: January 2010 to December 2014 and January 2016 to December 2019. The primary exposure was the availability of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) at the hospital level defined by the degree of implementation of EVT (>10% change from pre-2015 to post-2015) after balancing key patient and hospital characteristics with overlap weighting. The coprimary end points were (1) the difference in in-hospital mortality for patients from counties with median income >$60 000 versus <$60 000 and (2) the difference in in-hospital mortality between Black and White patients. Secondary end points were differences in in-hospital mortality by sex, insurance status, county-level poverty, and county-level educational attainment. Exploratory end points were differences in ambulatory status at hospital discharge and a composite of in-hospital mortality/discharge to hospice across the above categories.
Results: Of 173 049 patients (median age, 75 years; 53.9% female) potentially eligible for EVT, 39 196 (22.7%) received EVT (7572 [10.0% of potentially eligible patients] between 2010 and 2014 and 31 624 [32.6% of potentially eligible patients] between 2016 and 2019). From 2010 to 2014, 1565 (20.7%) of patients and from 2016 to 2019, 5158 (16.3%) who received EVT died in hospital. Implementation of EVT was associated with decreased disparities in mortality rates for patients from counties with median inflation-adjusted income >$60 000 versus <$60 000 (absolute risk difference, 3.9% [95% CI, 0.53%-7.3%]). Implementation of EVT was not associated with changes in differences in in-hospital mortality by race, sex, county poverty rates, county educational attainment, or insurance status.
Conclusions: Among patients with acute ischemic stroke who were potentially eligible for EVT, the implementation of EVT on a hospital level did not worsen health equity in any dimension (race/ethnicity, sex, or insurance status) and was associated with improvements in socioeconomic equity in acute ischemic stroke mortality.
期刊介绍:
Stroke is a monthly publication that collates reports of clinical and basic investigation of any aspect of the cerebral circulation and its diseases. The publication covers a wide range of disciplines including anesthesiology, critical care medicine, epidemiology, internal medicine, neurology, neuro-ophthalmology, neuropathology, neuropsychology, neurosurgery, nuclear medicine, nursing, radiology, rehabilitation, speech pathology, vascular physiology, and vascular surgery.
The audience of Stroke includes neurologists, basic scientists, cardiologists, vascular surgeons, internists, interventionalists, neurosurgeons, nurses, and physiatrists.
Stroke is indexed in Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAB Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts, CINAHL, Current Contents, Embase, MEDLINE, and Science Citation Index Expanded.