现有哪些指导方针支持性健康和生殖健康服务的远程咨询?政策与实践文献综述。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Charlotte Spurway, Iestyn Williams, Christian Bohm, Oluseyi Cyril Ayinde, Fiona Burns, Jo Gibbs, Jo Josh, Helen Munro, Danielle Solomon, Melvina Woode Owusu, Jonathan D C Ross, Louise J Jackson
{"title":"现有哪些指导方针支持性健康和生殖健康服务的远程咨询?政策与实践文献综述。","authors":"Charlotte Spurway, Iestyn Williams, Christian Bohm, Oluseyi Cyril Ayinde, Fiona Burns, Jo Gibbs, Jo Josh, Helen Munro, Danielle Solomon, Melvina Woode Owusu, Jonathan D C Ross, Louise J Jackson","doi":"10.1136/sextrans-2025-056519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The use of remote consultations, such as appointments via telephone, video, online or text in sexual and reproductive health services (SRHS) across the UK, has expanded in recent years. This review synthesises grey literature from different organisations to identify current practice and guidance for remote consultations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched for a range of grey literature document types, including unpublished reports, evaluations, published standards, guidance, blogs and opinion pieces. The searches were conducted between March 2023 and July 2024 using Google, as well as the Healthcare Management Information Consortium database and preidentified organisational websites (eg, the British Association for Sexual Health and HIV, the Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare). Data extracted included terminology, challenges to implementation and linked guidance and equity considerations in the use of remote consultations in SRHS. Narrative synthesis was used to analyse findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The available guidance on implementing and delivering remote SRHS is modest in scope and volume and draws on a sparse evidence base. Existing guidance recommends the use of safeguarding assessments and checklists to support pathways from remote into in-person care. While remote consultations were seen as potentially enhancing equity, challenges included differences in technology access and digital literacy. Equity-related guidance included prioritising disadvantaged groups for in-person appointments and flexible care pathways.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>The grey literature highlights the potential of remote SRHS to improve access and equity while also identifying risks in implementation and outcomes. There is an ongoing requirement for detailed, evidence-informed guidance that incorporates service user perspectives.</p>","PeriodicalId":21624,"journal":{"name":"Sexually Transmitted Infections","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What guidance exists to support remote consultations in sexual and reproductive health services? A review of the policy and practice literature.\",\"authors\":\"Charlotte Spurway, Iestyn Williams, Christian Bohm, Oluseyi Cyril Ayinde, Fiona Burns, Jo Gibbs, Jo Josh, Helen Munro, Danielle Solomon, Melvina Woode Owusu, Jonathan D C Ross, Louise J Jackson\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/sextrans-2025-056519\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The use of remote consultations, such as appointments via telephone, video, online or text in sexual and reproductive health services (SRHS) across the UK, has expanded in recent years. This review synthesises grey literature from different organisations to identify current practice and guidance for remote consultations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched for a range of grey literature document types, including unpublished reports, evaluations, published standards, guidance, blogs and opinion pieces. The searches were conducted between March 2023 and July 2024 using Google, as well as the Healthcare Management Information Consortium database and preidentified organisational websites (eg, the British Association for Sexual Health and HIV, the Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare). Data extracted included terminology, challenges to implementation and linked guidance and equity considerations in the use of remote consultations in SRHS. Narrative synthesis was used to analyse findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The available guidance on implementing and delivering remote SRHS is modest in scope and volume and draws on a sparse evidence base. Existing guidance recommends the use of safeguarding assessments and checklists to support pathways from remote into in-person care. While remote consultations were seen as potentially enhancing equity, challenges included differences in technology access and digital literacy. Equity-related guidance included prioritising disadvantaged groups for in-person appointments and flexible care pathways.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>The grey literature highlights the potential of remote SRHS to improve access and equity while also identifying risks in implementation and outcomes. There is an ongoing requirement for detailed, evidence-informed guidance that incorporates service user perspectives.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21624,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sexually Transmitted Infections\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sexually Transmitted Infections\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2025-056519\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexually Transmitted Infections","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2025-056519","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:近年来,在英国各地的性与生殖健康服务(SRHS)中,通过电话、视频、在线或文本预约等远程咨询的使用有所扩大。本综述综合了来自不同组织的灰色文献,以确定远程咨询的当前实践和指导。方法:我们检索了一系列灰色文献文档类型,包括未发表的报告、评估、已发表的标准、指南、博客和评论文章。这些搜索是在2023年3月至2024年7月期间使用谷歌、医疗管理信息联盟数据库和预先确定的组织网站(例如,英国性健康和艾滋病毒协会、性和生殖保健学院)进行的。提取的数据包括术语、执行方面的挑战以及在性健康和健康服务中使用远程咨询的相关指导和公平考虑。叙述性综合用于分析研究结果。结果:关于实施和提供远程SRHS的现有指导在范围和数量上是适度的,并且借鉴了稀疏的证据基础。现有指南建议使用保障评估和检查清单,以支持从远程到现场护理的途径。虽然远程咨询被视为可能促进公平,但挑战包括技术获取和数字素养方面的差异。与公平相关的指导包括优先考虑弱势群体的面对面预约和灵活的护理途径。讨论和结论:灰色文献强调了远程SRHS在改善可及性和公平性方面的潜力,同时也确定了实施和结果中的风险。目前仍需要详细的、有证据依据的指导,并纳入服务使用者的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What guidance exists to support remote consultations in sexual and reproductive health services? A review of the policy and practice literature.

Introduction: The use of remote consultations, such as appointments via telephone, video, online or text in sexual and reproductive health services (SRHS) across the UK, has expanded in recent years. This review synthesises grey literature from different organisations to identify current practice and guidance for remote consultations.

Methods: We searched for a range of grey literature document types, including unpublished reports, evaluations, published standards, guidance, blogs and opinion pieces. The searches were conducted between March 2023 and July 2024 using Google, as well as the Healthcare Management Information Consortium database and preidentified organisational websites (eg, the British Association for Sexual Health and HIV, the Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare). Data extracted included terminology, challenges to implementation and linked guidance and equity considerations in the use of remote consultations in SRHS. Narrative synthesis was used to analyse findings.

Results: The available guidance on implementing and delivering remote SRHS is modest in scope and volume and draws on a sparse evidence base. Existing guidance recommends the use of safeguarding assessments and checklists to support pathways from remote into in-person care. While remote consultations were seen as potentially enhancing equity, challenges included differences in technology access and digital literacy. Equity-related guidance included prioritising disadvantaged groups for in-person appointments and flexible care pathways.

Discussion and conclusions: The grey literature highlights the potential of remote SRHS to improve access and equity while also identifying risks in implementation and outcomes. There is an ongoing requirement for detailed, evidence-informed guidance that incorporates service user perspectives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sexually Transmitted Infections
Sexually Transmitted Infections 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
96
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Sexually Transmitted Infections is the world’s longest running international journal on sexual health. It aims to keep practitioners, trainees and researchers up to date in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of all STIs and HIV. The journal publishes original research, descriptive epidemiology, evidence-based reviews and comment on the clinical, public health, sociological and laboratory aspects of sexual health from around the world. We also publish educational articles, letters and other material of interest to readers, along with podcasts and other online material. STI provides a high quality editorial service from submission to publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信