伦理力量:概念化、规模发展和验证。

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Heungsik Park, John Blenkinsopp, Jun Ki Lee, Jaeyong Lee
{"title":"伦理力量:概念化、规模发展和验证。","authors":"Heungsik Park, John Blenkinsopp, Jun Ki Lee, Jaeyong Lee","doi":"10.1177/00332941251370228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to conceptualize ethical muscle, develop a scale to measure it, and verify the scale's validity. After conducting a comprehensive review of the relevant literature, we conceptualized the term ethical muscle using a competency framework. Identifying its meaningful dimensions, we developed an ethical muscle scale in five phases. First, in-depth interviews were conducted with government employees (<i>N</i> = 20) using the Critical Incident Technique. Second, an expert panel (<i>N</i> = 22) assessed the content validity of the items collected during the first phase using the Delphi method. Third, we surveyed government employees (<i>N</i> = 544) and undertook factor analysis of the data to construct an ethical muscle scale. Fourth, the psychometric properties of the developed scale were identified by confirmatory factor analysis in AMOS. Finally, we conducted a replication study (<i>N</i> = 213) to confirm and generalize our findings. These phases led to the development of a four-factor ethical muscle scale comprising 15 items. The four factors are moral courage (five items), ethical knowledge (four items), duty orientation (three items), and morality (three items). The validation study demonstrated the reliability and validity of the scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":21149,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Reports","volume":" ","pages":"332941251370228"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethical Muscle: Conceptualization, Scale Development, and Validation.\",\"authors\":\"Heungsik Park, John Blenkinsopp, Jun Ki Lee, Jaeyong Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00332941251370228\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this study was to conceptualize ethical muscle, develop a scale to measure it, and verify the scale's validity. After conducting a comprehensive review of the relevant literature, we conceptualized the term ethical muscle using a competency framework. Identifying its meaningful dimensions, we developed an ethical muscle scale in five phases. First, in-depth interviews were conducted with government employees (<i>N</i> = 20) using the Critical Incident Technique. Second, an expert panel (<i>N</i> = 22) assessed the content validity of the items collected during the first phase using the Delphi method. Third, we surveyed government employees (<i>N</i> = 544) and undertook factor analysis of the data to construct an ethical muscle scale. Fourth, the psychometric properties of the developed scale were identified by confirmatory factor analysis in AMOS. Finally, we conducted a replication study (<i>N</i> = 213) to confirm and generalize our findings. These phases led to the development of a four-factor ethical muscle scale comprising 15 items. The four factors are moral courage (five items), ethical knowledge (four items), duty orientation (three items), and morality (three items). The validation study demonstrated the reliability and validity of the scale.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological Reports\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"332941251370228\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941251370228\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941251370228","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是概念化道德肌肉,开发一个测量它的量表,并验证量表的有效性。在对相关文献进行全面回顾后,我们使用能力框架对术语道德肌肉进行了概念化。在确定其有意义的维度后,我们开发了一个分为五个阶段的道德肌肉量表。首先,使用关键事件技术对政府雇员(N = 20)进行深度访谈。其次,一个专家小组(N = 22)使用德尔菲法评估第一阶段收集的项目的内容效度。第三,对544名政府雇员进行问卷调查,对数据进行因子分析,构建道德肌肉量表。第四,采用验证性因子分析对编制的量表进行心理测量学性质的鉴定。最后,我们进行了一项重复研究(N = 213)来证实和推广我们的发现。这些阶段导致了包含15个项目的四因素道德肌肉量表的发展。这四个因素分别是道德勇气(5项)、伦理知识(4项)、责任取向(3项)和道德(3项)。验证研究证实了量表的信度和效度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ethical Muscle: Conceptualization, Scale Development, and Validation.

The aim of this study was to conceptualize ethical muscle, develop a scale to measure it, and verify the scale's validity. After conducting a comprehensive review of the relevant literature, we conceptualized the term ethical muscle using a competency framework. Identifying its meaningful dimensions, we developed an ethical muscle scale in five phases. First, in-depth interviews were conducted with government employees (N = 20) using the Critical Incident Technique. Second, an expert panel (N = 22) assessed the content validity of the items collected during the first phase using the Delphi method. Third, we surveyed government employees (N = 544) and undertook factor analysis of the data to construct an ethical muscle scale. Fourth, the psychometric properties of the developed scale were identified by confirmatory factor analysis in AMOS. Finally, we conducted a replication study (N = 213) to confirm and generalize our findings. These phases led to the development of a four-factor ethical muscle scale comprising 15 items. The four factors are moral courage (five items), ethical knowledge (four items), duty orientation (three items), and morality (three items). The validation study demonstrated the reliability and validity of the scale.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Reports
Psychological Reports PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
171
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信