高等教育中的服务型领导:基于项目反应理论分析的分级反应模型方法。

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Majid Ghasemy, Magdalene Ang Chooi Hwa, Ke-Hai Yuan
{"title":"高等教育中的服务型领导:基于项目反应理论分析的分级反应模型方法。","authors":"Majid Ghasemy, Magdalene Ang Chooi Hwa, Ke-Hai Yuan","doi":"10.1177/00332941251370241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Given the limited number of servant leadership (SL) applications in higher education research, this study aims to provide higher education researchers with a sound and validated scale to measure SL in academic settings. More specifically, it evaluates the psychometric properties of the seven-item SL scale (SL-7) developed by Liden and colleagues. For this purpose, we collected data from lecturers in Malaysia, conducted thorough data screening procedures followed by verifying the assumptions of item response theory (IRT) analysis. These procedures led to the exclusion of two items from the original scale. Next, we proceeded with graded response model (GRM) analysis and evaluated the discrimination parameters, difficulty thresholds, and the patterns of information provided by each item. Our analysis supports the conclusion that the resulting five-item validated scale effectively measures lecturers' SL behavior in applied higher education research. Finally, we discussed the theoretical and practical implications of our findings and provided recommendations for future SL research in academic landscapes.</p>","PeriodicalId":21149,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Reports","volume":" ","pages":"332941251370241"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Servant Leadership in Higher Education: A Graded Response Model Approach to Item Response Theory Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Majid Ghasemy, Magdalene Ang Chooi Hwa, Ke-Hai Yuan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00332941251370241\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Given the limited number of servant leadership (SL) applications in higher education research, this study aims to provide higher education researchers with a sound and validated scale to measure SL in academic settings. More specifically, it evaluates the psychometric properties of the seven-item SL scale (SL-7) developed by Liden and colleagues. For this purpose, we collected data from lecturers in Malaysia, conducted thorough data screening procedures followed by verifying the assumptions of item response theory (IRT) analysis. These procedures led to the exclusion of two items from the original scale. Next, we proceeded with graded response model (GRM) analysis and evaluated the discrimination parameters, difficulty thresholds, and the patterns of information provided by each item. Our analysis supports the conclusion that the resulting five-item validated scale effectively measures lecturers' SL behavior in applied higher education research. Finally, we discussed the theoretical and practical implications of our findings and provided recommendations for future SL research in academic landscapes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological Reports\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"332941251370241\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941251370241\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941251370241","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鉴于服务型领导在高等教育研究中的应用有限,本研究旨在为高等教育研究人员提供一个完善且有效的量表来衡量学术环境中的服务型领导。更具体地说,它评估了由Liden和同事开发的七项SL量表(SL-7)的心理测量特性。为此,我们收集了马来西亚讲师的数据,进行了彻底的数据筛选程序,随后验证了项目反应理论(IRT)分析的假设。这些程序导致从原来的比额表中删除了两个项目。接下来,我们进行了分级反应模型(GRM)分析,并评估了识别参数、难度阈值和每个项目提供的信息模式。我们的分析支持了以下结论:所编制的五项经验证的量表有效地衡量了应用型高等教育研究中讲师的语言学习行为。最后,我们讨论了研究结果的理论和实践意义,并对未来学术景观下的语言学习研究提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Servant Leadership in Higher Education: A Graded Response Model Approach to Item Response Theory Analysis.

Given the limited number of servant leadership (SL) applications in higher education research, this study aims to provide higher education researchers with a sound and validated scale to measure SL in academic settings. More specifically, it evaluates the psychometric properties of the seven-item SL scale (SL-7) developed by Liden and colleagues. For this purpose, we collected data from lecturers in Malaysia, conducted thorough data screening procedures followed by verifying the assumptions of item response theory (IRT) analysis. These procedures led to the exclusion of two items from the original scale. Next, we proceeded with graded response model (GRM) analysis and evaluated the discrimination parameters, difficulty thresholds, and the patterns of information provided by each item. Our analysis supports the conclusion that the resulting five-item validated scale effectively measures lecturers' SL behavior in applied higher education research. Finally, we discussed the theoretical and practical implications of our findings and provided recommendations for future SL research in academic landscapes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Reports
Psychological Reports PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
171
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信