Ana Jelovac, Richard Braithwaite, Charles H Kellner, Declan M McLoughlin
{"title":"持续电惊厥治疗联合药物治疗预防抑郁症复发:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Ana Jelovac, Richard Braithwaite, Charles H Kellner, Declan M McLoughlin","doi":"10.1017/S0033291725101608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Relapse following electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) remains a significant clinical challenge despite continuation of pharmacotherapy. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD420251000113) of the efficacy and acceptability of continuation ECT (cECT) combined with pharmacotherapy compared to pharmacotherapy alone for relapse prevention following an acute course of ECT for depression. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and CENTRAL databases for randomized controlled trials enrolling adults diagnosed with a unipolar or bipolar major depressive episode, who met remission or response criteria after an acute course of ECT and who were subsequently randomized to cECT with pharmacotherapy versus pharmacotherapy alone. The efficacy outcome was the cumulative relapse rate at 6-month follow-up. Data were synthesized using random-effects meta-analyses with effect sizes expressed as relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Four trials (<i>n</i> = 254) met the inclusion criteria. cECT combined with pharmacotherapy significantly reduced relapse compared to pharmacotherapy alone (RR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.37-0.88; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%; number needed to treat = 7). Sensitivity analyses consistently supported the superiority of cECT under all examined dropout scenarios and analytic approaches. Acceptability, measured by all-cause dropout, was similar between the groups (RR = 1.12; 95% CI = 0.48-2.62; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%). cECT combined with pharmacotherapy significantly reduces the RR of relapse by 43% compared to pharmacotherapy alone without compromising acceptability. These findings reinforce the role of cECT as a valuable relapse prevention strategy following successful acute ECT and highlight the need for larger, multicenter trials to further optimize post-ECT prophylaxis.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":"55 ","pages":"e251"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Continuation electroconvulsive therapy combined with pharmacotherapy for depression relapse prevention: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ana Jelovac, Richard Braithwaite, Charles H Kellner, Declan M McLoughlin\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0033291725101608\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Relapse following electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) remains a significant clinical challenge despite continuation of pharmacotherapy. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD420251000113) of the efficacy and acceptability of continuation ECT (cECT) combined with pharmacotherapy compared to pharmacotherapy alone for relapse prevention following an acute course of ECT for depression. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and CENTRAL databases for randomized controlled trials enrolling adults diagnosed with a unipolar or bipolar major depressive episode, who met remission or response criteria after an acute course of ECT and who were subsequently randomized to cECT with pharmacotherapy versus pharmacotherapy alone. The efficacy outcome was the cumulative relapse rate at 6-month follow-up. Data were synthesized using random-effects meta-analyses with effect sizes expressed as relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Four trials (<i>n</i> = 254) met the inclusion criteria. cECT combined with pharmacotherapy significantly reduced relapse compared to pharmacotherapy alone (RR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.37-0.88; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%; number needed to treat = 7). Sensitivity analyses consistently supported the superiority of cECT under all examined dropout scenarios and analytic approaches. Acceptability, measured by all-cause dropout, was similar between the groups (RR = 1.12; 95% CI = 0.48-2.62; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%). cECT combined with pharmacotherapy significantly reduces the RR of relapse by 43% compared to pharmacotherapy alone without compromising acceptability. These findings reinforce the role of cECT as a valuable relapse prevention strategy following successful acute ECT and highlight the need for larger, multicenter trials to further optimize post-ECT prophylaxis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological Medicine\",\"volume\":\"55 \",\"pages\":\"e251\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291725101608\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291725101608","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
电休克治疗(ECT)后复发仍然是一个重大的临床挑战,尽管继续药物治疗。我们进行了一项系统回顾和荟萃分析(PROSPERO CRD420251000113),比较了继续ECT (cECT)联合药物治疗在预防急性ECT治疗抑郁症后复发方面的疗效和可接受性。我们检索了PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和CENTRAL数据库,寻找随机对照试验,纳入诊断为单极或双相重性抑郁发作的成年人,他们在ECT急性疗程后达到缓解或反应标准,随后随机分为药物治疗组和单独药物治疗组。疗效指标为6个月随访时的累计复发率。采用随机效应荟萃分析综合数据,效应量表示为相对风险(RRs), 95%置信区间(ci)。4项试验(n = 254)符合纳入标准。与单独药物治疗相比,cECT联合药物治疗显著减少复发(RR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.37-0.88; I2 = 0%;需要治疗的人数= 7)。敏感性分析一致支持cECT在所有检查的辍学情景和分析方法下的优势。以全因退出率衡量的可接受性在两组之间相似(RR = 1.12; 95% CI = 0.48-2.62; I2 = 0%)。与单独的药物治疗相比,cECT联合药物治疗显着降低了43%的复发RR,而不影响可接受性。这些发现加强了ECT作为急性ECT成功后复发预防策略的重要作用,并强调需要更大规模的多中心试验来进一步优化ECT后预防。
Continuation electroconvulsive therapy combined with pharmacotherapy for depression relapse prevention: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Relapse following electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) remains a significant clinical challenge despite continuation of pharmacotherapy. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD420251000113) of the efficacy and acceptability of continuation ECT (cECT) combined with pharmacotherapy compared to pharmacotherapy alone for relapse prevention following an acute course of ECT for depression. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and CENTRAL databases for randomized controlled trials enrolling adults diagnosed with a unipolar or bipolar major depressive episode, who met remission or response criteria after an acute course of ECT and who were subsequently randomized to cECT with pharmacotherapy versus pharmacotherapy alone. The efficacy outcome was the cumulative relapse rate at 6-month follow-up. Data were synthesized using random-effects meta-analyses with effect sizes expressed as relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Four trials (n = 254) met the inclusion criteria. cECT combined with pharmacotherapy significantly reduced relapse compared to pharmacotherapy alone (RR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.37-0.88; I2 = 0%; number needed to treat = 7). Sensitivity analyses consistently supported the superiority of cECT under all examined dropout scenarios and analytic approaches. Acceptability, measured by all-cause dropout, was similar between the groups (RR = 1.12; 95% CI = 0.48-2.62; I2 = 0%). cECT combined with pharmacotherapy significantly reduces the RR of relapse by 43% compared to pharmacotherapy alone without compromising acceptability. These findings reinforce the role of cECT as a valuable relapse prevention strategy following successful acute ECT and highlight the need for larger, multicenter trials to further optimize post-ECT prophylaxis.
期刊介绍:
Now in its fifth decade of publication, Psychological Medicine is a leading international journal in the fields of psychiatry, related aspects of psychology and basic sciences. From 2014, there are 16 issues a year, each featuring original articles reporting key research being undertaken worldwide, together with shorter editorials by distinguished scholars and an important book review section. The journal''s success is clearly demonstrated by a consistently high impact factor.