在肯尼亚马查科斯县参加集体产前护理的妇女中,选择卫生机构分娩的决定因素:一项横断面调查。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Jefferson Mwaisaka, Pooja Sripad, Melanie Olum, Patricia Owira, Samuel Mwaura, Rhoda Njeru, Daniel Muli, Faith Mutisya, Anne Hyre, Lisa Noguchi, Stephanie Suhowatsky
{"title":"在肯尼亚马查科斯县参加集体产前护理的妇女中,选择卫生机构分娩的决定因素:一项横断面调查。","authors":"Jefferson Mwaisaka, Pooja Sripad, Melanie Olum, Patricia Owira, Samuel Mwaura, Rhoda Njeru, Daniel Muli, Faith Mutisya, Anne Hyre, Lisa Noguchi, Stephanie Suhowatsky","doi":"10.1186/s12978-025-02107-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Group antenatal (G-ANC) care has been introduced in Kenya and is associated with increased ANC contacts. Previous studies did not report higher likelihood of facility-based deliveries, where facility delivery rates are high (> 80%). It is unknown whether G-ANC influences women's choice of delivery facility. This study sought to understand if and how exposure to and experience of G-ANC, among other factors, influence women's decisions on which facility to deliver. Study findings can inform health system strategies including the Service Delivery Re-design.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional survey from December 2023 to January 2024 in eight health centers in Machakos County, Kenya with women who participated in G-ANC and had a facility delivery to understand women's choice of health facility for childbirth, i.e., whether they returned to the same G-ANC facility for delivery or went to another facility. The survey interviews were administered through telephone, as a nested component of a larger implementation research focused on the adoption of G-ANC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 470 women who participated in the phone survey, 29.8% of women returned to deliver at the facility where they received G-ANC and 70.2% delivered elsewhere. Most women (84.3%) delivered in the public sector. Regression analysis models revealed two significant predictors for delivery in the same G-ANC facility: proximity to the facility (adjusted AOR 4.13, 95% CI: 2.73-6.23, p < 0.001); and positive staff attitudes (adjusted AOR 4.68, 95% CI: 2.06-10.60, p < 0.001). Two significant predictors of delivering in a different facility were being \"told/advised to give birth there during pregnancy/ANC\" (adjusted AOR 0.23, 95% CI: 0.15-0.35, p < 0.001) and high household wealth status (quintile four AOR 0.29, 95% CI: 0.09-0.91, p = 0.034; quintile five AOR 0.23, 95% CI: 0.07-0.72, p = 0.011). Intervention exposure was not significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most women participating in G-ANC chose to deliver in another facility. The choice of facility for childbirth was most strongly influenced by factors other than the intervention, such as proximity, positive staff attitudes, health advice, and household wealth status.</p>","PeriodicalId":20899,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Health","volume":"22 1","pages":"150"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12374317/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determinants of health facility choice for delivery among women participating in group antenatal care in Machakos county, kenya: A cross-sectional survey.\",\"authors\":\"Jefferson Mwaisaka, Pooja Sripad, Melanie Olum, Patricia Owira, Samuel Mwaura, Rhoda Njeru, Daniel Muli, Faith Mutisya, Anne Hyre, Lisa Noguchi, Stephanie Suhowatsky\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12978-025-02107-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Group antenatal (G-ANC) care has been introduced in Kenya and is associated with increased ANC contacts. Previous studies did not report higher likelihood of facility-based deliveries, where facility delivery rates are high (> 80%). It is unknown whether G-ANC influences women's choice of delivery facility. This study sought to understand if and how exposure to and experience of G-ANC, among other factors, influence women's decisions on which facility to deliver. Study findings can inform health system strategies including the Service Delivery Re-design.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional survey from December 2023 to January 2024 in eight health centers in Machakos County, Kenya with women who participated in G-ANC and had a facility delivery to understand women's choice of health facility for childbirth, i.e., whether they returned to the same G-ANC facility for delivery or went to another facility. The survey interviews were administered through telephone, as a nested component of a larger implementation research focused on the adoption of G-ANC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 470 women who participated in the phone survey, 29.8% of women returned to deliver at the facility where they received G-ANC and 70.2% delivered elsewhere. Most women (84.3%) delivered in the public sector. Regression analysis models revealed two significant predictors for delivery in the same G-ANC facility: proximity to the facility (adjusted AOR 4.13, 95% CI: 2.73-6.23, p < 0.001); and positive staff attitudes (adjusted AOR 4.68, 95% CI: 2.06-10.60, p < 0.001). Two significant predictors of delivering in a different facility were being \\\"told/advised to give birth there during pregnancy/ANC\\\" (adjusted AOR 0.23, 95% CI: 0.15-0.35, p < 0.001) and high household wealth status (quintile four AOR 0.29, 95% CI: 0.09-0.91, p = 0.034; quintile five AOR 0.23, 95% CI: 0.07-0.72, p = 0.011). Intervention exposure was not significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most women participating in G-ANC chose to deliver in another facility. The choice of facility for childbirth was most strongly influenced by factors other than the intervention, such as proximity, positive staff attitudes, health advice, and household wealth status.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reproductive Health\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"150\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12374317/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reproductive Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-025-02107-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-025-02107-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肯尼亚已引入群体产前护理,并与产前接触增加有关。以前的研究没有报告在医院分娩的可能性更高,那里的医院分娩率很高(约80%)。目前尚不清楚G-ANC是否会影响妇女对分娩设施的选择。这项研究试图了解,除其他因素外,接触和经历G-ANC是否以及如何影响妇女对分娩设施的决定。研究结果可为包括服务提供重新设计在内的卫生系统战略提供信息。方法:我们于2023年12月至2024年1月在肯尼亚马查科斯县的8个卫生中心对参与G-ANC并在医院分娩的妇女进行了横断面调查,以了解妇女对分娩卫生机构的选择,即她们是回到同一家G-ANC机构分娩还是去另一家机构分娩。调查访谈是通过电话进行的,作为一个更大的执行研究的嵌套组成部分,重点是采用G-ANC。结果:在参与电话调查的470名妇女中,29.8%的妇女回到她们接受G-ANC的机构分娩,70.2%的妇女在其他地方分娩。大多数妇女(84.3%)在公共部门分娩。回归分析模型揭示了在同一G-ANC设施分娩的两个重要预测因素:设施附近(调整AOR 4.13, 95% CI: 2.73-6.23, p)结论:大多数参加G-ANC的妇女选择在其他设施分娩。分娩设施的选择受干预因素以外的因素影响最大,如邻近程度、工作人员的积极态度、健康建议和家庭财富状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Determinants of health facility choice for delivery among women participating in group antenatal care in Machakos county, kenya: A cross-sectional survey.

Determinants of health facility choice for delivery among women participating in group antenatal care in Machakos county, kenya: A cross-sectional survey.

Background: Group antenatal (G-ANC) care has been introduced in Kenya and is associated with increased ANC contacts. Previous studies did not report higher likelihood of facility-based deliveries, where facility delivery rates are high (> 80%). It is unknown whether G-ANC influences women's choice of delivery facility. This study sought to understand if and how exposure to and experience of G-ANC, among other factors, influence women's decisions on which facility to deliver. Study findings can inform health system strategies including the Service Delivery Re-design.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey from December 2023 to January 2024 in eight health centers in Machakos County, Kenya with women who participated in G-ANC and had a facility delivery to understand women's choice of health facility for childbirth, i.e., whether they returned to the same G-ANC facility for delivery or went to another facility. The survey interviews were administered through telephone, as a nested component of a larger implementation research focused on the adoption of G-ANC.

Results: Of the 470 women who participated in the phone survey, 29.8% of women returned to deliver at the facility where they received G-ANC and 70.2% delivered elsewhere. Most women (84.3%) delivered in the public sector. Regression analysis models revealed two significant predictors for delivery in the same G-ANC facility: proximity to the facility (adjusted AOR 4.13, 95% CI: 2.73-6.23, p < 0.001); and positive staff attitudes (adjusted AOR 4.68, 95% CI: 2.06-10.60, p < 0.001). Two significant predictors of delivering in a different facility were being "told/advised to give birth there during pregnancy/ANC" (adjusted AOR 0.23, 95% CI: 0.15-0.35, p < 0.001) and high household wealth status (quintile four AOR 0.29, 95% CI: 0.09-0.91, p = 0.034; quintile five AOR 0.23, 95% CI: 0.07-0.72, p = 0.011). Intervention exposure was not significant.

Conclusion: Most women participating in G-ANC chose to deliver in another facility. The choice of facility for childbirth was most strongly influenced by factors other than the intervention, such as proximity, positive staff attitudes, health advice, and household wealth status.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reproductive Health
Reproductive Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
220
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Reproductive Health focuses on all aspects of human reproduction. The journal includes sections dedicated to adolescent health, female fertility and midwifery and all content is open access. Reproductive health is defined as a state of physical, mental, and social well-being in all matters relating to the reproductive system, at all stages of life. Good reproductive health implies that people are able to have a satisfying and safe sex life, the capability to reproduce and the freedom to decide if, when, and how often to do so. Men and women should be informed about and have access to safe, effective, affordable, and acceptable methods of family planning of their choice, and the right to appropriate health-care services that enable women to safely go through pregnancy and childbirth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信