EXPRESS:多目标搜索范式能可靠地区分串行和并行搜索过程吗?

IF 1.4 3区 心理学 Q4 PHYSIOLOGY
Yujie Zheng, Yuhang Pan, Yinuo Xu, Zhi Li
{"title":"EXPRESS:多目标搜索范式能可靠地区分串行和并行搜索过程吗?","authors":"Yujie Zheng, Yuhang Pan, Yinuo Xu, Zhi Li","doi":"10.1177/17470218251375982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Distinguishing between serial and parallel processing modes in visual search tasks remains a challenge in cognitive psychology. The multiple target search (MTS) paradigm, which utilizes target redundancy gains to identify parallel searches, is currently one of the promising approaches for this distinction. Despite being proposed five decades ago, this method has not gained widespread acceptance among researchers in visual search area, potentially due to two limitations. One is its inability to reliably detect redundancy gains in established parallel searches (e.g., the distinct popout color search). The other is the presence of redundancy gains in pure-target-absent trials, which are apparently incompatible with the MTS's explanation of redundancy gains. In this study, we tested a modified version of the traditional reaction-time-based MTS (rt-MTS) by developing an accuracy-based MTS (acc-MTS). The results suggested that the acc-MTS successfully overcomes the aforementioned limitations of the rt-MTS paradigm while maintaining significantly greater efficiency. These findings established the acc-MTS as a reliable and efficient methodological advancement for determining the serial or parallel nature of visual search tasks.</p>","PeriodicalId":20869,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"17470218251375982"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can multiple-target search paradigms reliably discriminate serial and parallel search processes?\",\"authors\":\"Yujie Zheng, Yuhang Pan, Yinuo Xu, Zhi Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17470218251375982\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Distinguishing between serial and parallel processing modes in visual search tasks remains a challenge in cognitive psychology. The multiple target search (MTS) paradigm, which utilizes target redundancy gains to identify parallel searches, is currently one of the promising approaches for this distinction. Despite being proposed five decades ago, this method has not gained widespread acceptance among researchers in visual search area, potentially due to two limitations. One is its inability to reliably detect redundancy gains in established parallel searches (e.g., the distinct popout color search). The other is the presence of redundancy gains in pure-target-absent trials, which are apparently incompatible with the MTS's explanation of redundancy gains. In this study, we tested a modified version of the traditional reaction-time-based MTS (rt-MTS) by developing an accuracy-based MTS (acc-MTS). The results suggested that the acc-MTS successfully overcomes the aforementioned limitations of the rt-MTS paradigm while maintaining significantly greater efficiency. These findings established the acc-MTS as a reliable and efficient methodological advancement for determining the serial or parallel nature of visual search tasks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17470218251375982\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218251375982\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218251375982","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

区分视觉搜索任务中的串行和并行处理模式一直是认知心理学中的一个难题。多目标搜索(MTS)范式利用目标冗余增益来识别并行搜索,是目前解决这一问题的一种很有前途的方法。尽管该方法早在50年前就被提出,但由于两方面的限制,该方法并未得到视觉搜索领域研究人员的广泛接受。其一是它无法可靠地检测已建立的并行搜索中的冗余增益(例如,不同的弹出框颜色搜索)。另一个是在纯目标缺失试验中存在冗余增益,这显然与MTS对冗余增益的解释不相容。在本研究中,我们通过开发基于准确性的MTS (acc-MTS)来测试传统基于反应时间的MTS (rt-MTS)的改进版本。结果表明,acc-MTS成功地克服了rt-MTS范式的上述局限性,同时保持了显著更高的效率。这些发现确立了acc-MTS作为确定视觉搜索任务的串行或并行性质的可靠和有效的方法进步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can multiple-target search paradigms reliably discriminate serial and parallel search processes?

Distinguishing between serial and parallel processing modes in visual search tasks remains a challenge in cognitive psychology. The multiple target search (MTS) paradigm, which utilizes target redundancy gains to identify parallel searches, is currently one of the promising approaches for this distinction. Despite being proposed five decades ago, this method has not gained widespread acceptance among researchers in visual search area, potentially due to two limitations. One is its inability to reliably detect redundancy gains in established parallel searches (e.g., the distinct popout color search). The other is the presence of redundancy gains in pure-target-absent trials, which are apparently incompatible with the MTS's explanation of redundancy gains. In this study, we tested a modified version of the traditional reaction-time-based MTS (rt-MTS) by developing an accuracy-based MTS (acc-MTS). The results suggested that the acc-MTS successfully overcomes the aforementioned limitations of the rt-MTS paradigm while maintaining significantly greater efficiency. These findings established the acc-MTS as a reliable and efficient methodological advancement for determining the serial or parallel nature of visual search tasks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
178
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Promoting the interests of scientific psychology and its researchers, QJEP, the journal of the Experimental Psychology Society, is a leading journal with a long-standing tradition of publishing cutting-edge research. Several articles have become classic papers in the fields of attention, perception, learning, memory, language, and reasoning. The journal publishes original articles on any topic within the field of experimental psychology (including comparative research). These include substantial experimental reports, review papers, rapid communications (reporting novel techniques or ground breaking results), comments (on articles previously published in QJEP or on issues of general interest to experimental psychologists), and book reviews. Experimental results are welcomed from all relevant techniques, including behavioural testing, brain imaging and computational modelling. QJEP offers a competitive publication time-scale. Accepted Rapid Communications have priority in the publication cycle and usually appear in print within three months. We aim to publish all accepted (but uncorrected) articles online within seven days. Our Latest Articles page offers immediate publication of articles upon reaching their final form. The journal offers an open access option called Open Select, enabling authors to meet funder requirements to make their article free to read online for all in perpetuity. Authors also benefit from a broad and diverse subscription base that delivers the journal contents to a world-wide readership. Together these features ensure that the journal offers authors the opportunity to raise the visibility of their work to a global audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信