Martin Tondel, Tobias Nordquist, Mats Isaksson, Christopher Rääf, Robert Wålinder
{"title":"瑞典切尔诺贝利核电站事故后癌症发病率的剂量反应与原子弹幸存者寿命研究的比较。","authors":"Martin Tondel, Tobias Nordquist, Mats Isaksson, Christopher Rääf, Robert Wålinder","doi":"10.1093/rpd/ncaf097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Follow-up of the atomic bomb survivors in Japan in the Life Span Study (LSS) has been fundamental for the understanding of the dose-response curve. We compare our risk estimates from a newly published epidemiological study on cancer in Sweden after the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant accident with the LSS data. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated using conditional logistic regression adjusted for rural/nonrural habitat, education level, and pre-Chernobyl cancer incidence from 1980 to 1985, respectively. Adjusted HRs by sex were calculated in deciles for all cancer sites combined for 1986 to 2020. These risk estimates were translated to excess relative risk (ERR) to allow comparison with LSS incidence data. ERRs per decile were compatible with ERR in the low-dose range <100 mGy for both sexes. The CIs in each decile need to be taken into account when interpreting the dose-response curve. Risk estimates in dose categories add important information at very low doses on the dose-response curve when compared to LSS data.</p>","PeriodicalId":20795,"journal":{"name":"Radiation protection dosimetry","volume":" ","pages":"1125-1130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12498092/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing dose response of cancer incidence in Sweden after the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant accident with Life Span Study of atomic bomb survivors.\",\"authors\":\"Martin Tondel, Tobias Nordquist, Mats Isaksson, Christopher Rääf, Robert Wålinder\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/rpd/ncaf097\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Follow-up of the atomic bomb survivors in Japan in the Life Span Study (LSS) has been fundamental for the understanding of the dose-response curve. We compare our risk estimates from a newly published epidemiological study on cancer in Sweden after the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant accident with the LSS data. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated using conditional logistic regression adjusted for rural/nonrural habitat, education level, and pre-Chernobyl cancer incidence from 1980 to 1985, respectively. Adjusted HRs by sex were calculated in deciles for all cancer sites combined for 1986 to 2020. These risk estimates were translated to excess relative risk (ERR) to allow comparison with LSS incidence data. ERRs per decile were compatible with ERR in the low-dose range <100 mGy for both sexes. The CIs in each decile need to be taken into account when interpreting the dose-response curve. Risk estimates in dose categories add important information at very low doses on the dose-response curve when compared to LSS data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiation protection dosimetry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1125-1130\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12498092/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiation protection dosimetry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncaf097\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation protection dosimetry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncaf097","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparing dose response of cancer incidence in Sweden after the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant accident with Life Span Study of atomic bomb survivors.
Follow-up of the atomic bomb survivors in Japan in the Life Span Study (LSS) has been fundamental for the understanding of the dose-response curve. We compare our risk estimates from a newly published epidemiological study on cancer in Sweden after the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant accident with the LSS data. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated using conditional logistic regression adjusted for rural/nonrural habitat, education level, and pre-Chernobyl cancer incidence from 1980 to 1985, respectively. Adjusted HRs by sex were calculated in deciles for all cancer sites combined for 1986 to 2020. These risk estimates were translated to excess relative risk (ERR) to allow comparison with LSS incidence data. ERRs per decile were compatible with ERR in the low-dose range <100 mGy for both sexes. The CIs in each decile need to be taken into account when interpreting the dose-response curve. Risk estimates in dose categories add important information at very low doses on the dose-response curve when compared to LSS data.
期刊介绍:
Radiation Protection Dosimetry covers all aspects of personal and environmental dosimetry and monitoring, for both ionising and non-ionising radiations. This includes biological aspects, physical concepts, biophysical dosimetry, external and internal personal dosimetry and monitoring, environmental and workplace monitoring, accident dosimetry, and dosimetry related to the protection of patients. Particular emphasis is placed on papers covering the fundamentals of dosimetry; units, radiation quantities and conversion factors. Papers covering archaeological dating are included only if the fundamental measurement method or technique, such as thermoluminescence, has direct application to personal dosimetry measurements. Papers covering the dosimetric aspects of radon or other naturally occurring radioactive materials and low level radiation are included. Animal experiments and ecological sample measurements are not included unless there is a significant relevant content reason.