Chantal Kapteijn, Nadieh Reinders, Martine Hueting, Rogier Alexander Van Huffelen, Eric Vermetten, Bas Rodenburg, Nienke Endenburg
{"title":"马的辅助互动(EAI)是黑马的赌注吗?测量EAI对创伤后应激障碍、焦虑和/或情绪障碍的心理和生理影响的系统综述。","authors":"Chantal Kapteijn, Nadieh Reinders, Martine Hueting, Rogier Alexander Van Huffelen, Eric Vermetten, Bas Rodenburg, Nienke Endenburg","doi":"10.5152/pcp.2025.24958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background: Conventional forms of trauma-focused psychological interventions seem to be less effective in military veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Equine Assisted Interventions (EAI) have become increasingly popular as an additional treatment, resulting in increasing research on the effects of EAI. However, no systematic review on the effects of EAI has focused on PTSD, anxiety and/or mood disorders and whether the effects are reflected in psychological and physiological measures. This systematic review investigated the treatment effects, study design, population, intervention, and psychological and physiological measurements in EAI research. Methods: The search strategy yielded 1028 original articles from 3 electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, and CAB Abstracts. These articles were screened by 2 individual blinded researchers with Rayyan according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and rendered 31 eligible studies. Results: Although all quantitative studies reported 1 or more positive treatment effects on symptoms of PTSD, anxiety and/or mood disorders, well-designed studies were sparse. This review demonstrated a lack of methodological information and few randomized controlled studies, in addition to a large heterogeneity in population characteristics, interventions, terminology, and questionnaires. Conclusion: Future studies should address these methodological considerations in order to advance the understanding of EAI and optimize their efficacy in treating PTSD, anxiety and/or mood disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":20847,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology","volume":"35 Suppl 1","pages":"S90-S112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12410245/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are Equine Assisted Interactions (EAI) a Dark Horse Bet? A Systematic Review on Measuring the Psychological and Physiological Effects of EAI on PTSD, Anxiety and/or Mood Disorders.\",\"authors\":\"Chantal Kapteijn, Nadieh Reinders, Martine Hueting, Rogier Alexander Van Huffelen, Eric Vermetten, Bas Rodenburg, Nienke Endenburg\",\"doi\":\"10.5152/pcp.2025.24958\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background: Conventional forms of trauma-focused psychological interventions seem to be less effective in military veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Equine Assisted Interventions (EAI) have become increasingly popular as an additional treatment, resulting in increasing research on the effects of EAI. However, no systematic review on the effects of EAI has focused on PTSD, anxiety and/or mood disorders and whether the effects are reflected in psychological and physiological measures. This systematic review investigated the treatment effects, study design, population, intervention, and psychological and physiological measurements in EAI research. Methods: The search strategy yielded 1028 original articles from 3 electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, and CAB Abstracts. These articles were screened by 2 individual blinded researchers with Rayyan according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and rendered 31 eligible studies. Results: Although all quantitative studies reported 1 or more positive treatment effects on symptoms of PTSD, anxiety and/or mood disorders, well-designed studies were sparse. This review demonstrated a lack of methodological information and few randomized controlled studies, in addition to a large heterogeneity in population characteristics, interventions, terminology, and questionnaires. Conclusion: Future studies should address these methodological considerations in order to advance the understanding of EAI and optimize their efficacy in treating PTSD, anxiety and/or mood disorders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology\",\"volume\":\"35 Suppl 1\",\"pages\":\"S90-S112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12410245/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5152/pcp.2025.24958\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/pcp.2025.24958","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Are Equine Assisted Interactions (EAI) a Dark Horse Bet? A Systematic Review on Measuring the Psychological and Physiological Effects of EAI on PTSD, Anxiety and/or Mood Disorders.
Background: Conventional forms of trauma-focused psychological interventions seem to be less effective in military veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Equine Assisted Interventions (EAI) have become increasingly popular as an additional treatment, resulting in increasing research on the effects of EAI. However, no systematic review on the effects of EAI has focused on PTSD, anxiety and/or mood disorders and whether the effects are reflected in psychological and physiological measures. This systematic review investigated the treatment effects, study design, population, intervention, and psychological and physiological measurements in EAI research. Methods: The search strategy yielded 1028 original articles from 3 electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, and CAB Abstracts. These articles were screened by 2 individual blinded researchers with Rayyan according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and rendered 31 eligible studies. Results: Although all quantitative studies reported 1 or more positive treatment effects on symptoms of PTSD, anxiety and/or mood disorders, well-designed studies were sparse. This review demonstrated a lack of methodological information and few randomized controlled studies, in addition to a large heterogeneity in population characteristics, interventions, terminology, and questionnaires. Conclusion: Future studies should address these methodological considerations in order to advance the understanding of EAI and optimize their efficacy in treating PTSD, anxiety and/or mood disorders.
期刊介绍:
Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology aims to reach a national and international audience and will accept submissions from authors worldwide. It gives high priority to original studies of interest to clinicians and scientists in applied and basic neurosciences and related disciplines. Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology publishes high quality research targeted to specialists, residents and scientists in psychiatry, psychology, neurology, pharmacology, molecular biology, genetics, physiology, neurochemistry, and related sciences.