马的辅助互动(EAI)是黑马的赌注吗?测量EAI对创伤后应激障碍、焦虑和/或情绪障碍的心理和生理影响的系统综述。

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Chantal Kapteijn, Nadieh Reinders, Martine Hueting, Rogier Alexander Van Huffelen, Eric Vermetten, Bas Rodenburg, Nienke Endenburg
{"title":"马的辅助互动(EAI)是黑马的赌注吗?测量EAI对创伤后应激障碍、焦虑和/或情绪障碍的心理和生理影响的系统综述。","authors":"Chantal Kapteijn, Nadieh Reinders, Martine Hueting, Rogier Alexander Van Huffelen, Eric Vermetten, Bas Rodenburg, Nienke Endenburg","doi":"10.5152/pcp.2025.24958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background: Conventional forms of trauma-focused psychological interventions seem to be less effective in military veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Equine Assisted Interventions (EAI) have become increasingly popular as an additional treatment, resulting in increasing research on the effects of EAI. However, no systematic review on the effects of EAI has focused on PTSD, anxiety and/or mood disorders and whether the effects are reflected in psychological and physiological measures. This systematic review investigated the treatment effects, study design, population, intervention, and psychological and physiological measurements in EAI research. Methods: The search strategy yielded 1028 original articles from 3 electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, and CAB Abstracts. These articles were screened by 2 individual blinded researchers with Rayyan according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and rendered 31 eligible studies. Results: Although all quantitative studies reported 1 or more positive treatment effects on symptoms of PTSD, anxiety and/or mood disorders, well-designed studies were sparse. This review demonstrated a lack of methodological information and few randomized controlled studies, in addition to a large heterogeneity in population characteristics, interventions, terminology, and questionnaires. Conclusion: Future studies should address these methodological considerations in order to advance the understanding of EAI and optimize their efficacy in treating PTSD, anxiety and/or mood disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":20847,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology","volume":"35 Suppl 1","pages":"S90-S112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12410245/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are Equine Assisted Interactions (EAI) a Dark Horse Bet? A Systematic Review on Measuring the Psychological and Physiological Effects of EAI on PTSD, Anxiety and/or Mood Disorders.\",\"authors\":\"Chantal Kapteijn, Nadieh Reinders, Martine Hueting, Rogier Alexander Van Huffelen, Eric Vermetten, Bas Rodenburg, Nienke Endenburg\",\"doi\":\"10.5152/pcp.2025.24958\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background: Conventional forms of trauma-focused psychological interventions seem to be less effective in military veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Equine Assisted Interventions (EAI) have become increasingly popular as an additional treatment, resulting in increasing research on the effects of EAI. However, no systematic review on the effects of EAI has focused on PTSD, anxiety and/or mood disorders and whether the effects are reflected in psychological and physiological measures. This systematic review investigated the treatment effects, study design, population, intervention, and psychological and physiological measurements in EAI research. Methods: The search strategy yielded 1028 original articles from 3 electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, and CAB Abstracts. These articles were screened by 2 individual blinded researchers with Rayyan according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and rendered 31 eligible studies. Results: Although all quantitative studies reported 1 or more positive treatment effects on symptoms of PTSD, anxiety and/or mood disorders, well-designed studies were sparse. This review demonstrated a lack of methodological information and few randomized controlled studies, in addition to a large heterogeneity in population characteristics, interventions, terminology, and questionnaires. Conclusion: Future studies should address these methodological considerations in order to advance the understanding of EAI and optimize their efficacy in treating PTSD, anxiety and/or mood disorders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology\",\"volume\":\"35 Suppl 1\",\"pages\":\"S90-S112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12410245/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5152/pcp.2025.24958\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/pcp.2025.24958","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:传统形式的以创伤为中心的心理干预对创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的退伍军人似乎效果较差。马辅助干预(EAI)作为一种额外的治疗方法越来越受欢迎,导致对EAI效果的研究越来越多。然而,关于EAI影响的系统综述尚未关注PTSD、焦虑和/或情绪障碍以及其影响是否反映在心理和生理指标上。本系统综述调查了EAI研究中的治疗效果、研究设计、人群、干预以及心理和生理测量。方法:检索策略从PubMed、Scopus和CAB Abstracts 3个电子数据库中获得1028篇原创文章。这些文章由2名独立盲法研究人员使用Rayyan根据系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目进行筛选,并获得31项符合条件的研究。结果:虽然所有的定量研究都报道了一种或多种对PTSD症状、焦虑和/或情绪障碍的积极治疗效果,但设计良好的研究很少。这篇综述表明缺乏方法学信息和很少的随机对照研究,此外在人群特征、干预措施、术语和问卷调查方面存在很大的异质性。结论:未来的研究应解决这些方法学上的考虑,以促进对EAI的理解,并优化其治疗PTSD、焦虑和/或情绪障碍的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Are Equine Assisted Interactions (EAI) a Dark Horse Bet? A Systematic Review on Measuring the Psychological and Physiological Effects of EAI on PTSD, Anxiety and/or Mood Disorders.

Are Equine Assisted Interactions (EAI) a Dark Horse Bet? A Systematic Review on Measuring the Psychological and Physiological Effects of EAI on PTSD, Anxiety and/or Mood Disorders.

Are Equine Assisted Interactions (EAI) a Dark Horse Bet? A Systematic Review on Measuring the Psychological and Physiological Effects of EAI on PTSD, Anxiety and/or Mood Disorders.

Background: Conventional forms of trauma-focused psychological interventions seem to be less effective in military veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Equine Assisted Interventions (EAI) have become increasingly popular as an additional treatment, resulting in increasing research on the effects of EAI. However, no systematic review on the effects of EAI has focused on PTSD, anxiety and/or mood disorders and whether the effects are reflected in psychological and physiological measures. This systematic review investigated the treatment effects, study design, population, intervention, and psychological and physiological measurements in EAI research. Methods: The search strategy yielded 1028 original articles from 3 electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, and CAB Abstracts. These articles were screened by 2 individual blinded researchers with Rayyan according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and rendered 31 eligible studies. Results: Although all quantitative studies reported 1 or more positive treatment effects on symptoms of PTSD, anxiety and/or mood disorders, well-designed studies were sparse. This review demonstrated a lack of methodological information and few randomized controlled studies, in addition to a large heterogeneity in population characteristics, interventions, terminology, and questionnaires. Conclusion: Future studies should address these methodological considerations in order to advance the understanding of EAI and optimize their efficacy in treating PTSD, anxiety and/or mood disorders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology
Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology aims to reach a national and international audience and will accept submissions from authors worldwide. It gives high priority to original studies of interest to clinicians and scientists in applied and basic neurosciences and related disciplines. Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology publishes high quality research targeted to specialists, residents and scientists in psychiatry, psychology, neurology, pharmacology, molecular biology, genetics, physiology, neurochemistry, and related sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信