Patricia A Cioe, William V Lechner, Garrett S Stang, Christopher W Kahler, Karen T Tashima, Thomas Eissenberg, Jennifer W Tidey
{"title":"转载:在美国,对吸烟的艾滋病毒感染者改用标准化研究电子烟的影响。","authors":"Patricia A Cioe, William V Lechner, Garrett S Stang, Christopher W Kahler, Karen T Tashima, Thomas Eissenberg, Jennifer W Tidey","doi":"10.1016/j.ypmed.2025.108389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>People with HIV (PWH) who smoke and report ambivalence about quitting may benefit from switching to non-combusted nicotine products. This pilot study examined the effects of providing the NIDA standardized research electronic cigarette (SREC) on smoking behaviors and inflammatory biomarkers in PWH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-five participants in the United States were enrolled from April 2022 to January 2024 (Mean age 54.4 [13.2] years, 30.1 % female, 62.9 % White) and randomized to SREC provision (n = 17) or usual brand control (n = 18). SREC participants were asked to substitute tobacco-flavor pod-type SRECs for their combustible cigarettes. SREC use and cigarette use were assessed weekly for 6 weeks. Serum inflammatory biomarkers were measured at baseline and week 6.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The effect of condition on cigarettes per day (CPD) during the 6-week period was significant, B = -5.68, 95 % CI = -10.25, -1.11: CPD were reduced by 42.7 % in the SREC condition versus 17.3 % in the control condition. Participants in the SREC condition reported significantly lower urge to smoke at week 6 compared to those in control, (B = -17.05, 95 % CI = -27.15, -6.95). One (5.9 %) participant reported that they transitioned completely from CCs to SREC at week 6. Significant decreases in inflammatory biomarkers were not observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participants who were provided the SREC, compared to those in the control condition, smoked fewer CPD and had reduced urge to smoke. However, dual use was the most common outcome, indicating that additional support may be needed to improve the likelihood of complete transition from CCs to noncombustible products.</p>","PeriodicalId":20339,"journal":{"name":"Preventive medicine","volume":" ","pages":"108389"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reprint of: The effects of switching to the standardized research electronic cigarette in people with HIV who smoke in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Patricia A Cioe, William V Lechner, Garrett S Stang, Christopher W Kahler, Karen T Tashima, Thomas Eissenberg, Jennifer W Tidey\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ypmed.2025.108389\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>People with HIV (PWH) who smoke and report ambivalence about quitting may benefit from switching to non-combusted nicotine products. This pilot study examined the effects of providing the NIDA standardized research electronic cigarette (SREC) on smoking behaviors and inflammatory biomarkers in PWH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-five participants in the United States were enrolled from April 2022 to January 2024 (Mean age 54.4 [13.2] years, 30.1 % female, 62.9 % White) and randomized to SREC provision (n = 17) or usual brand control (n = 18). SREC participants were asked to substitute tobacco-flavor pod-type SRECs for their combustible cigarettes. SREC use and cigarette use were assessed weekly for 6 weeks. Serum inflammatory biomarkers were measured at baseline and week 6.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The effect of condition on cigarettes per day (CPD) during the 6-week period was significant, B = -5.68, 95 % CI = -10.25, -1.11: CPD were reduced by 42.7 % in the SREC condition versus 17.3 % in the control condition. Participants in the SREC condition reported significantly lower urge to smoke at week 6 compared to those in control, (B = -17.05, 95 % CI = -27.15, -6.95). One (5.9 %) participant reported that they transitioned completely from CCs to SREC at week 6. Significant decreases in inflammatory biomarkers were not observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participants who were provided the SREC, compared to those in the control condition, smoked fewer CPD and had reduced urge to smoke. However, dual use was the most common outcome, indicating that additional support may be needed to improve the likelihood of complete transition from CCs to noncombustible products.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Preventive medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"108389\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Preventive medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2025.108389\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2025.108389","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:吸烟并对戒烟有矛盾心理的HIV感染者(PWH)可能会从转向非燃烧尼古丁产品中受益。本初步研究考察了提供NIDA标准化研究电子烟(SREC)对PWH吸烟行为和炎症生物标志物的影响。方法:从2022年4月到2024年1月,在美国招募了35名参与者(平均年龄54.4[13.2]岁,女性30.1%,白人62.9%),随机分为SREC组(n = 17)和常规品牌组(n = 18)。SREC参与者被要求用烟草味豆荚型SREC代替他们的可燃香烟。每周评估SREC使用情况和香烟使用情况,持续6周。在基线和第6周测量血清炎症生物标志物。结果:6周时间内,状态对吸烟者日吸烟量(CPD)的影响显著,B = -5.68, 95% CI = -10.25, -1.11: SREC组吸烟量减少42.7%,对照组减少17.3%。与对照组相比,SREC组在第6周报告的吸烟冲动显著降低(B = -17.05, 95% CI = -27.15, -6.95)。一名(5.9%)参与者报告他们在第6周完全从cc过渡到SREC。炎症生物标志物未见显著下降。结论:与对照组相比,提供SREC的参与者吸烟的CPD减少,吸烟的冲动也减少。然而,双重用途是最常见的结果,这表明可能需要额外的支持来提高从CCs完全过渡到不可燃产品的可能性。
Reprint of: The effects of switching to the standardized research electronic cigarette in people with HIV who smoke in the United States.
Objective: People with HIV (PWH) who smoke and report ambivalence about quitting may benefit from switching to non-combusted nicotine products. This pilot study examined the effects of providing the NIDA standardized research electronic cigarette (SREC) on smoking behaviors and inflammatory biomarkers in PWH.
Methods: Thirty-five participants in the United States were enrolled from April 2022 to January 2024 (Mean age 54.4 [13.2] years, 30.1 % female, 62.9 % White) and randomized to SREC provision (n = 17) or usual brand control (n = 18). SREC participants were asked to substitute tobacco-flavor pod-type SRECs for their combustible cigarettes. SREC use and cigarette use were assessed weekly for 6 weeks. Serum inflammatory biomarkers were measured at baseline and week 6.
Results: The effect of condition on cigarettes per day (CPD) during the 6-week period was significant, B = -5.68, 95 % CI = -10.25, -1.11: CPD were reduced by 42.7 % in the SREC condition versus 17.3 % in the control condition. Participants in the SREC condition reported significantly lower urge to smoke at week 6 compared to those in control, (B = -17.05, 95 % CI = -27.15, -6.95). One (5.9 %) participant reported that they transitioned completely from CCs to SREC at week 6. Significant decreases in inflammatory biomarkers were not observed.
Conclusions: Participants who were provided the SREC, compared to those in the control condition, smoked fewer CPD and had reduced urge to smoke. However, dual use was the most common outcome, indicating that additional support may be needed to improve the likelihood of complete transition from CCs to noncombustible products.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1972 by Ernst Wynder, Preventive Medicine is an international scholarly journal that provides prompt publication of original articles on the science and practice of disease prevention, health promotion, and public health policymaking. Preventive Medicine aims to reward innovation. It will favor insightful observational studies, thoughtful explorations of health data, unsuspected new angles for existing hypotheses, robust randomized controlled trials, and impartial systematic reviews. Preventive Medicine''s ultimate goal is to publish research that will have an impact on the work of practitioners of disease prevention and health promotion, as well as of related disciplines.