医疗住院医师和研究员的为人父母之路:休假政策对俄勒冈健康与科学大学父母培训生的影响。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Eline Lenne, Marie Soller, Gillian Lashen, Stephanie Dukhovny, Alinda Reimer, Susanne Klawetter, Emily Carter
{"title":"医疗住院医师和研究员的为人父母之路:休假政策对俄勒冈健康与科学大学父母培训生的影响。","authors":"Eline Lenne, Marie Soller, Gillian Lashen, Stephanie Dukhovny, Alinda Reimer, Susanne Klawetter, Emily Carter","doi":"10.1093/postmj/qgaf124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Residents and fellows in graduate medical education (GME) programs across the USA often complete training during childbearing years, presenting challenges for pregnant and parenting trainees balancing work and family. Institutional policies must better support these trainees. Previous studies show supported trainees experience reduced burnout, better health, and improved patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study assessed the experiences and unmet needs of pregnant and parenting GME trainees and presents their recommendations for improved support.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design, we examined the unmet needs and challenges of pregnant and parenting trainees, and their recommendations for improvement. We distributed a survey to all GME trainees across all specialties at Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU) in 2023. Ninety-eight out of 160 eligible participants completed the survey (~60% response rate).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite existing policies, trainees at Oregon Health and Science University faced persistent challenges. We identified three themes and related recommendations from our analysis of quantitative and open-ended survey data: (1) Leave and coverage-barriers to adequate parental leave and inconsistent enforcement of GME policies; [2] Lactation-meeting breast/chest-feeding goals required immense effort due to limited resources; and [3] Health and childcare-existing policies negatively impacted fertility, childcare access, and mental health. Respondents recommended standardized, flexible leave policies; transparent processes for work adjustments and planning; improved access to private, well-equipped lactation spaces; and tailored mental health and wellness programs to support the perinatal period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Barriers persist for trainees starting families. Institutional leaders have actionable opportunities to improve equity and institutional support of parenting trainees. Key messages What is already known on this topic: GME trainees face significant challenges during childbearing years, including inconsistent parental leave policies, limited institutional support, and increased risk of stress and burnout, which negatively impact their health and patient-care outcomes. What this study adds: This study contributes trainees' recommendations for institutional reforms necessary to address persistent gaps in support for parenting trainees, such as insufficient parental leave, inadequate lactation accommodations, and barriers to mental health care. How this study might affect research, practice, or policy: Incorporating trainee perspectives is crucial to developing effective interventions. Institutions and national standards should prioritize equitable parental leave, flexible scheduling, and comprehensive supports to foster a culture that aligns with trainees' personal and professional goals. Research Questions How do Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requirements and institutional policies reinforce or mitigate structural inequities that impact parent medical trainees? What systemic barriers and supports shape access to perinatal health and mental health resources for parent medical trainees? How might medical trainees' perspectives influence the development and implementation of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requirements and institutional policies that better support medical trainees ability to balance professional training and family responsibilities?</p>","PeriodicalId":20374,"journal":{"name":"Postgraduate Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12483826/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Path to parenthood for medical residents and fellows: the impact of leave policies on parent trainees at Oregon Health and Science University.\",\"authors\":\"Eline Lenne, Marie Soller, Gillian Lashen, Stephanie Dukhovny, Alinda Reimer, Susanne Klawetter, Emily Carter\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/postmj/qgaf124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Residents and fellows in graduate medical education (GME) programs across the USA often complete training during childbearing years, presenting challenges for pregnant and parenting trainees balancing work and family. Institutional policies must better support these trainees. Previous studies show supported trainees experience reduced burnout, better health, and improved patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study assessed the experiences and unmet needs of pregnant and parenting GME trainees and presents their recommendations for improved support.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design, we examined the unmet needs and challenges of pregnant and parenting trainees, and their recommendations for improvement. We distributed a survey to all GME trainees across all specialties at Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU) in 2023. Ninety-eight out of 160 eligible participants completed the survey (~60% response rate).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite existing policies, trainees at Oregon Health and Science University faced persistent challenges. We identified three themes and related recommendations from our analysis of quantitative and open-ended survey data: (1) Leave and coverage-barriers to adequate parental leave and inconsistent enforcement of GME policies; [2] Lactation-meeting breast/chest-feeding goals required immense effort due to limited resources; and [3] Health and childcare-existing policies negatively impacted fertility, childcare access, and mental health. Respondents recommended standardized, flexible leave policies; transparent processes for work adjustments and planning; improved access to private, well-equipped lactation spaces; and tailored mental health and wellness programs to support the perinatal period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Barriers persist for trainees starting families. Institutional leaders have actionable opportunities to improve equity and institutional support of parenting trainees. Key messages What is already known on this topic: GME trainees face significant challenges during childbearing years, including inconsistent parental leave policies, limited institutional support, and increased risk of stress and burnout, which negatively impact their health and patient-care outcomes. What this study adds: This study contributes trainees' recommendations for institutional reforms necessary to address persistent gaps in support for parenting trainees, such as insufficient parental leave, inadequate lactation accommodations, and barriers to mental health care. How this study might affect research, practice, or policy: Incorporating trainee perspectives is crucial to developing effective interventions. Institutions and national standards should prioritize equitable parental leave, flexible scheduling, and comprehensive supports to foster a culture that aligns with trainees' personal and professional goals. Research Questions How do Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requirements and institutional policies reinforce or mitigate structural inequities that impact parent medical trainees? What systemic barriers and supports shape access to perinatal health and mental health resources for parent medical trainees? How might medical trainees' perspectives influence the development and implementation of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requirements and institutional policies that better support medical trainees ability to balance professional training and family responsibilities?</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Postgraduate Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12483826/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Postgraduate Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/postmj/qgaf124\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postgraduate Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/postmj/qgaf124","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:美国研究生医学教育(GME)项目的住院医师和研究员通常在育龄期完成培训,这给怀孕和育儿的受训者平衡工作和家庭带来了挑战。体制政策要加强对这些学员的支持。先前的研究表明,受支持的受援者经历了更少的倦怠,更好的健康状况,并改善了患者的预后。目的:本研究评估了怀孕和育儿GME学员的经历和未满足的需求,并提出了改进支持的建议。方法:采用序贯解释混合方法设计,对怀孕和育儿培训学员未满足的需求和面临的挑战进行调查,并提出改进建议。我们在2023年向俄勒冈健康与科学大学(OHSU)所有专业的所有GME学员分发了一份调查。160名符合条件的参与者中有98人完成了调查(~60%的回复率)。结果:尽管有现行政策,俄勒冈健康与科学大学的学员仍面临着持续的挑战。通过对定量和开放式调查数据的分析,我们确定了三个主题和相关建议:(1)休假和覆盖范围——获得充足育儿假的障碍和不一致的GME政策执行;[2]由于资源有限,达到母乳喂养目标需要付出巨大的努力;健康和儿童保育——现有政策对生育率、儿童保育机会和心理健康产生负面影响。受访者建议实行标准化、灵活的休假政策;工作调整和规划的透明程序;改善使用私人、设备齐全的哺乳场所的机会;量身定制的心理健康和健康项目来支持围产期。结论:学员成家的障碍依然存在。机构领导人有切实可行的机会来改善对育儿培训生的公平和机构支持。关于这一主题的已知情况:GME学员在育龄期面临重大挑战,包括不一致的育儿假政策、有限的机构支持以及压力和倦怠风险增加,这对他们的健康和患者护理结果产生了负面影响。本研究补充的内容:本研究为培训生提供了必要的制度改革建议,以解决培训生在育儿方面持续存在的差距,如育儿假不足、哺乳场所不足和精神卫生保健障碍。本研究对研究、实践或政策的影响:结合受训者的观点对于制定有效的干预措施至关重要。机构和国家标准应优先考虑公平的育儿假、灵活的时间安排和全面的支持,以培养符合学员个人和职业目标的文化。研究问题:研究生医学教育认证委员会的要求和制度政策如何加强或减轻影响父母医学实习生的结构性不平等?哪些系统性障碍和支持影响了父母医学培训生获得围产期健康和心理健康资源的机会?医学培训生的观点如何影响研究生医学教育认证委员会要求和制度政策的制定和实施,以更好地支持医学培训生平衡专业培训和家庭责任的能力?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Path to parenthood for medical residents and fellows: the impact of leave policies on parent trainees at Oregon Health and Science University.

Background: Residents and fellows in graduate medical education (GME) programs across the USA often complete training during childbearing years, presenting challenges for pregnant and parenting trainees balancing work and family. Institutional policies must better support these trainees. Previous studies show supported trainees experience reduced burnout, better health, and improved patient outcomes.

Objective: This study assessed the experiences and unmet needs of pregnant and parenting GME trainees and presents their recommendations for improved support.

Methods: Using a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design, we examined the unmet needs and challenges of pregnant and parenting trainees, and their recommendations for improvement. We distributed a survey to all GME trainees across all specialties at Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU) in 2023. Ninety-eight out of 160 eligible participants completed the survey (~60% response rate).

Results: Despite existing policies, trainees at Oregon Health and Science University faced persistent challenges. We identified three themes and related recommendations from our analysis of quantitative and open-ended survey data: (1) Leave and coverage-barriers to adequate parental leave and inconsistent enforcement of GME policies; [2] Lactation-meeting breast/chest-feeding goals required immense effort due to limited resources; and [3] Health and childcare-existing policies negatively impacted fertility, childcare access, and mental health. Respondents recommended standardized, flexible leave policies; transparent processes for work adjustments and planning; improved access to private, well-equipped lactation spaces; and tailored mental health and wellness programs to support the perinatal period.

Conclusions: Barriers persist for trainees starting families. Institutional leaders have actionable opportunities to improve equity and institutional support of parenting trainees. Key messages What is already known on this topic: GME trainees face significant challenges during childbearing years, including inconsistent parental leave policies, limited institutional support, and increased risk of stress and burnout, which negatively impact their health and patient-care outcomes. What this study adds: This study contributes trainees' recommendations for institutional reforms necessary to address persistent gaps in support for parenting trainees, such as insufficient parental leave, inadequate lactation accommodations, and barriers to mental health care. How this study might affect research, practice, or policy: Incorporating trainee perspectives is crucial to developing effective interventions. Institutions and national standards should prioritize equitable parental leave, flexible scheduling, and comprehensive supports to foster a culture that aligns with trainees' personal and professional goals. Research Questions How do Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requirements and institutional policies reinforce or mitigate structural inequities that impact parent medical trainees? What systemic barriers and supports shape access to perinatal health and mental health resources for parent medical trainees? How might medical trainees' perspectives influence the development and implementation of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requirements and institutional policies that better support medical trainees ability to balance professional training and family responsibilities?

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Postgraduate Medical Journal
Postgraduate Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Postgraduate Medical Journal is a peer reviewed journal published on behalf of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine. The journal aims to support junior doctors and their teachers and contribute to the continuing professional development of all doctors by publishing papers on a wide range of topics relevant to the practicing clinician and teacher. Papers published in PMJ include those that focus on core competencies; that describe current practice and new developments in all branches of medicine; that describe relevance and impact of translational research on clinical practice; that provide background relevant to examinations; and papers on medical education and medical education research. PMJ supports CPD by providing the opportunity for doctors to publish many types of articles including original clinical research; reviews; quality improvement reports; editorials, and correspondence on clinical matters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信