利用环境协变量改进植物病害的基因组预测。

IF 4.4 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Charlotte Brault, Emily J Conley, Andrew C Read, Andrew J Green, Karl D Glover, Jason P Cook, Harsimardeep S Gill, Jason D Fiedler, James A Anderson
{"title":"利用环境协变量改进植物病害的基因组预测。","authors":"Charlotte Brault, Emily J Conley, Andrew C Read, Andrew J Green, Karl D Glover, Jason P Cook, Harsimardeep S Gill, Jason D Fiedler, James A Anderson","doi":"10.1186/s13007-025-01418-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fusarium Head Blight (FHB) is a destructive fungal disease affecting wheat and barley, leading to significant yield losses and reduced grain quality. Susceptibility to FHB is influenced by genetic factors, environmental conditions, and genotype-by-environment interactions (GxE), making it challenging to predict disease resistance across diverse environments. This study investigates GxE in a long-term spring wheat multi-environment uniform nursery trial focusing on the evaluation of resistant lines in northern US breeding programs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Traditionally, GxE has been analyzed as a reaction norm over an environment index. Here, we computed the environment index as a linear combination of environmental covariables specific to each environment, and we derived an environment relationship matrix. Three methods were compared, all aimed at predicting untested genotypes in untested environments: the widely used Finlay-Wilkinson regression (FW), the joint-genomic regression analysis (JGRA) method, and mixed models incorporating an environmental covariates matrix. These were benchmarked against a baseline genomic selection model (GS) without environmental covariates. Predictive abilities were assessed within and across environments. The results revealed that the JGRA marker effect method was more accurate than GS in within- and across-environment predictions, although the differences were small. The predictive ability slightly decreased when the target environment was less related to the training environments. Mixed models performed similarly to JGRA within-environment, but JGRA outperformed the other methods for across-environment predictions. Additionally, JGRA identified significant genetic markers associated with baseline FHB resistance and environmental sensitivity. Furthermore, location-specific genomic estimated breeding values were predicted, providing insights into genotype stability across varying locations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings highlight the value of incorporating environmental covariates to increase predictive ability and improve the selection of resistant genotypes for diverse, untested environments. By leveraging this approach, breeders can effectively exploit GxE interactions to improve disease management at no additional cost.</p>","PeriodicalId":20100,"journal":{"name":"Plant Methods","volume":"21 1","pages":"114"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12366029/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving genomic prediction for plant disease using environmental covariates.\",\"authors\":\"Charlotte Brault, Emily J Conley, Andrew C Read, Andrew J Green, Karl D Glover, Jason P Cook, Harsimardeep S Gill, Jason D Fiedler, James A Anderson\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13007-025-01418-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fusarium Head Blight (FHB) is a destructive fungal disease affecting wheat and barley, leading to significant yield losses and reduced grain quality. Susceptibility to FHB is influenced by genetic factors, environmental conditions, and genotype-by-environment interactions (GxE), making it challenging to predict disease resistance across diverse environments. This study investigates GxE in a long-term spring wheat multi-environment uniform nursery trial focusing on the evaluation of resistant lines in northern US breeding programs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Traditionally, GxE has been analyzed as a reaction norm over an environment index. Here, we computed the environment index as a linear combination of environmental covariables specific to each environment, and we derived an environment relationship matrix. Three methods were compared, all aimed at predicting untested genotypes in untested environments: the widely used Finlay-Wilkinson regression (FW), the joint-genomic regression analysis (JGRA) method, and mixed models incorporating an environmental covariates matrix. These were benchmarked against a baseline genomic selection model (GS) without environmental covariates. Predictive abilities were assessed within and across environments. The results revealed that the JGRA marker effect method was more accurate than GS in within- and across-environment predictions, although the differences were small. The predictive ability slightly decreased when the target environment was less related to the training environments. Mixed models performed similarly to JGRA within-environment, but JGRA outperformed the other methods for across-environment predictions. Additionally, JGRA identified significant genetic markers associated with baseline FHB resistance and environmental sensitivity. Furthermore, location-specific genomic estimated breeding values were predicted, providing insights into genotype stability across varying locations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings highlight the value of incorporating environmental covariates to increase predictive ability and improve the selection of resistant genotypes for diverse, untested environments. By leveraging this approach, breeders can effectively exploit GxE interactions to improve disease management at no additional cost.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20100,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant Methods\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"114\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12366029/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-025-01418-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Methods","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-025-01418-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:赤霉病(Fusarium Head Blight, FHB)是一种影响小麦和大麦的破坏性真菌疾病,导致严重的产量损失和粮食品质下降。对FHB的易感性受遗传因素、环境条件和基因型-环境相互作用(GxE)的影响,这使得预测不同环境下的疾病抗性具有挑战性。本研究在一项长期的春小麦多环境统一苗圃试验中对GxE进行了研究,重点是对美国北部育种计划中的抗性品系进行评估。结果:传统上,GxE是作为环境指标的反应规范来分析的。在这里,我们将环境指数计算为特定于每种环境的环境协变量的线性组合,并推导出环境关系矩阵。我们比较了三种方法,它们都旨在预测未经测试的环境中未经测试的基因型:广泛使用的Finlay-Wilkinson回归(FW)、联合基因组回归分析(JGRA)方法和包含环境协变量矩阵的混合模型。这些是在没有环境协变量的基线基因组选择模型(GS)的基础上进行基准测试的。预测能力在环境内部和跨环境中进行评估。结果表明,JGRA标记效应法在环境内和跨环境预测中比GS法更准确,但差异较小。当目标环境与训练环境的相关性较弱时,预测能力略有下降。混合模型在环境内的表现与JGRA相似,但JGRA在跨环境预测方面的表现优于其他方法。此外,JGRA还发现了与基线FHB抗性和环境敏感性相关的重要遗传标记。此外,预测了位点特异性基因组估计育种值,为不同位点的基因型稳定性提供了见解。结论:这些发现突出了纳入环境协变量的价值,以提高预测能力,并改善在多样化,未经测试的环境中选择耐药基因型。通过利用这种方法,育种者可以有效地利用GxE相互作用来改善疾病管理,而不需要额外的成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Improving genomic prediction for plant disease using environmental covariates.

Improving genomic prediction for plant disease using environmental covariates.

Improving genomic prediction for plant disease using environmental covariates.

Improving genomic prediction for plant disease using environmental covariates.

Background: Fusarium Head Blight (FHB) is a destructive fungal disease affecting wheat and barley, leading to significant yield losses and reduced grain quality. Susceptibility to FHB is influenced by genetic factors, environmental conditions, and genotype-by-environment interactions (GxE), making it challenging to predict disease resistance across diverse environments. This study investigates GxE in a long-term spring wheat multi-environment uniform nursery trial focusing on the evaluation of resistant lines in northern US breeding programs.

Results: Traditionally, GxE has been analyzed as a reaction norm over an environment index. Here, we computed the environment index as a linear combination of environmental covariables specific to each environment, and we derived an environment relationship matrix. Three methods were compared, all aimed at predicting untested genotypes in untested environments: the widely used Finlay-Wilkinson regression (FW), the joint-genomic regression analysis (JGRA) method, and mixed models incorporating an environmental covariates matrix. These were benchmarked against a baseline genomic selection model (GS) without environmental covariates. Predictive abilities were assessed within and across environments. The results revealed that the JGRA marker effect method was more accurate than GS in within- and across-environment predictions, although the differences were small. The predictive ability slightly decreased when the target environment was less related to the training environments. Mixed models performed similarly to JGRA within-environment, but JGRA outperformed the other methods for across-environment predictions. Additionally, JGRA identified significant genetic markers associated with baseline FHB resistance and environmental sensitivity. Furthermore, location-specific genomic estimated breeding values were predicted, providing insights into genotype stability across varying locations.

Conclusion: These findings highlight the value of incorporating environmental covariates to increase predictive ability and improve the selection of resistant genotypes for diverse, untested environments. By leveraging this approach, breeders can effectively exploit GxE interactions to improve disease management at no additional cost.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Plant Methods
Plant Methods 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
3.90%
发文量
121
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Plant Methods is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal for the plant research community that encompasses all aspects of technological innovation in the plant sciences. There is no doubt that we have entered an exciting new era in plant biology. The completion of the Arabidopsis genome sequence, and the rapid progress being made in other plant genomics projects are providing unparalleled opportunities for progress in all areas of plant science. Nevertheless, enormous challenges lie ahead if we are to understand the function of every gene in the genome, and how the individual parts work together to make the whole organism. Achieving these goals will require an unprecedented collaborative effort, combining high-throughput, system-wide technologies with more focused approaches that integrate traditional disciplines such as cell biology, biochemistry and molecular genetics. Technological innovation is probably the most important catalyst for progress in any scientific discipline. Plant Methods’ goal is to stimulate the development and adoption of new and improved techniques and research tools and, where appropriate, to promote consistency of methodologies for better integration of data from different laboratories.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信