Mariana Bueno Manini, Natali Caroline da Silva, Rafaela Agra de Castro, Milena Baptistella Grotta, Adyleia A D Contrera Toro
{"title":"Palivizumabe是儿童哮喘发生的保护因素吗?荟萃分析的系统评价。","authors":"Mariana Bueno Manini, Natali Caroline da Silva, Rafaela Agra de Castro, Milena Baptistella Grotta, Adyleia A D Contrera Toro","doi":"10.1002/ppul.71242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Premature infants are at increased risk of developing chronic respiratory diseases, predisposing them to severe infections, such as those caused by respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). Palivizumab reduces the severity of RSV infections in high-risk children; however, its relationship with asthma development in premature infants remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review with meta-analysis aimed to review the literature and assess whether prophylaxis with palivizumab protects premature infants without congenital heart disease from developing asthma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 14 studies met the inclusion criteria, assessing 1,364,238 children; of these, 9232 received palivizumab. No significant difference in the chance of developing asthma between the groups (odds ratio (OR) of 0.84, 95% CI [0.62-1.13], p = 0.1968). Heterogeneity between studies was I² = 35.6%. Subgroup analysis for children with a family history of atopy showed no significant reduction in asthma risk (OR 0.78, 95% CI: 0.40-1.55, p = 0.3390). Sensitivity analysis confirmed result robustness. IgE levels were similar between the groups (standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.03 [95% CI: -0.30; 0.23], p = 0.8088). Children who received palivizumab were diagnosed younger (SMD -0.24 [95% CI: -0.38; -0.09], p = 0.0014), with lower gestational age (MD -0.75 [95% CI: -1.61; 0.12], p = 0.0915).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Palivizumab prophylaxis does not reduce asthma risk in premature children without congenital heart disease. Its primary benefit lies in preventing severe RSV infections, with no direct impact on asthma developing.</p>","PeriodicalId":19932,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Pulmonology","volume":"60 8","pages":"e71242"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12372439/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Palivizumabe a Protective Factor for the Development of Asthma in Children? A Systematic Review With Metanalysis.\",\"authors\":\"Mariana Bueno Manini, Natali Caroline da Silva, Rafaela Agra de Castro, Milena Baptistella Grotta, Adyleia A D Contrera Toro\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ppul.71242\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Premature infants are at increased risk of developing chronic respiratory diseases, predisposing them to severe infections, such as those caused by respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). Palivizumab reduces the severity of RSV infections in high-risk children; however, its relationship with asthma development in premature infants remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review with meta-analysis aimed to review the literature and assess whether prophylaxis with palivizumab protects premature infants without congenital heart disease from developing asthma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 14 studies met the inclusion criteria, assessing 1,364,238 children; of these, 9232 received palivizumab. No significant difference in the chance of developing asthma between the groups (odds ratio (OR) of 0.84, 95% CI [0.62-1.13], p = 0.1968). Heterogeneity between studies was I² = 35.6%. Subgroup analysis for children with a family history of atopy showed no significant reduction in asthma risk (OR 0.78, 95% CI: 0.40-1.55, p = 0.3390). Sensitivity analysis confirmed result robustness. IgE levels were similar between the groups (standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.03 [95% CI: -0.30; 0.23], p = 0.8088). Children who received palivizumab were diagnosed younger (SMD -0.24 [95% CI: -0.38; -0.09], p = 0.0014), with lower gestational age (MD -0.75 [95% CI: -1.61; 0.12], p = 0.0915).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Palivizumab prophylaxis does not reduce asthma risk in premature children without congenital heart disease. Its primary benefit lies in preventing severe RSV infections, with no direct impact on asthma developing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Pulmonology\",\"volume\":\"60 8\",\"pages\":\"e71242\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12372439/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Pulmonology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.71242\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.71242","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
前言:早产儿患慢性呼吸道疾病的风险增加,易患严重感染,如呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)引起的感染。帕利珠单抗降低高危儿童RSV感染的严重程度;然而,其与早产儿哮喘发展的关系尚不清楚。目的:本系统综述与荟萃分析旨在回顾文献并评估帕利珠单抗预防是否可以保护无先天性心脏病的早产儿不发生哮喘。结果:共有14项研究符合纳入标准,评估了1,364,238名儿童;其中,9232人接受了帕利珠单抗治疗。两组发生哮喘的几率无显著差异(优势比(OR)为0.84,95% CI [0.62-1.13], p = 0.1968)。研究间异质性为I²= 35.6%。有特应性家族史的儿童的亚组分析显示哮喘风险没有显著降低(OR 0.78, 95% CI: 0.40-1.55, p = 0.3390)。敏感性分析证实了结果的稳健性。各组间IgE水平相似(标准化平均差[SMD] -0.03 [95% CI: -0.30; 0.23], p = 0.8088)。接受帕利珠单抗治疗的儿童被诊断为更年轻(SMD -0.24 [95% CI: -0.38; -0.09], p = 0.0014),胎龄更低(MD -0.75 [95% CI: -1.61; 0.12], p = 0.0915)。结论:帕利珠单抗预防不能降低无先天性心脏病的早产儿哮喘风险。它的主要好处在于预防严重的呼吸道合胞病毒感染,对哮喘的发展没有直接影响。
Is Palivizumabe a Protective Factor for the Development of Asthma in Children? A Systematic Review With Metanalysis.
Introduction: Premature infants are at increased risk of developing chronic respiratory diseases, predisposing them to severe infections, such as those caused by respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). Palivizumab reduces the severity of RSV infections in high-risk children; however, its relationship with asthma development in premature infants remains unclear.
Objective: This systematic review with meta-analysis aimed to review the literature and assess whether prophylaxis with palivizumab protects premature infants without congenital heart disease from developing asthma.
Results: In total, 14 studies met the inclusion criteria, assessing 1,364,238 children; of these, 9232 received palivizumab. No significant difference in the chance of developing asthma between the groups (odds ratio (OR) of 0.84, 95% CI [0.62-1.13], p = 0.1968). Heterogeneity between studies was I² = 35.6%. Subgroup analysis for children with a family history of atopy showed no significant reduction in asthma risk (OR 0.78, 95% CI: 0.40-1.55, p = 0.3390). Sensitivity analysis confirmed result robustness. IgE levels were similar between the groups (standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.03 [95% CI: -0.30; 0.23], p = 0.8088). Children who received palivizumab were diagnosed younger (SMD -0.24 [95% CI: -0.38; -0.09], p = 0.0014), with lower gestational age (MD -0.75 [95% CI: -1.61; 0.12], p = 0.0915).
Conclusions: Palivizumab prophylaxis does not reduce asthma risk in premature children without congenital heart disease. Its primary benefit lies in preventing severe RSV infections, with no direct impact on asthma developing.
期刊介绍:
Pediatric Pulmonology (PPUL) is the foremost global journal studying the respiratory system in disease and in health as it develops from intrauterine life though adolescence to adulthood. Combining explicit and informative analysis of clinical as well as basic scientific research, PPUL provides a look at the many facets of respiratory system disorders in infants and children, ranging from pathological anatomy, developmental issues, and pathophysiology to infectious disease, asthma, cystic fibrosis, and airborne toxins. Focused attention is given to the reporting of diagnostic and therapeutic methods for neonates, preschool children, and adolescents, the enduring effects of childhood respiratory diseases, and newly described infectious diseases.
PPUL concentrates on subject matters of crucial interest to specialists preparing for the Pediatric Subspecialty Examinations in the United States and other countries. With its attentive coverage and extensive clinical data, this journal is a principle source for pediatricians in practice and in training and a must have for all pediatric pulmonologists.